Install
$ agentstack add skill-hoangsonww-claude-code-agent-monitor-cache-efficiency ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Cache Efficiency
Diagnose whether prompt caching is actually saving money, and where it is not.
Input
The user provides: $ARGUMENTS
This may be: empty (analyze the whole fleet), "today" / "this week" / a date range, a session ID to scope the analysis, or a target like "hit rate > 80%". When empty, analyze all data from /api/analytics.
Data Sources
| Endpoint | Returns | |----------|---------| | GET /api/analytics | tokens.total_input, tokens.total_output, tokens.total_cache_read, tokens.total_cache_write (baselines pre-summed), plus daily_sessions | | GET /api/sessions?limit=200 | Session list — each has model, cwd, startedat, endedat, inline cost, metadata (JSON: usage_extras with cache token detail) | | GET /api/sessions/{id} | Full session detail with nested agents and events, for drill-down on a flagged session | | GET /api/pricing/cost | { total_cost, breakdown: [{ model, input_tokens, output_tokens, cache_read_tokens, cache_write_tokens, cost, matched_rule }] } — used to price cache read vs write spend |
How cache economics work
cache_hit_rate = total_cache_read / (total_cache_read + total_input)
cache_reuse = total_cache_read / total_cache_write
cache_read_cost = (cache_read_tokens / 1M) × cache_read_per_mtok
cache_write_cost = (cache_write_tokens / 1M) × cache_write_per_mtok
Cache writes cost more per token than cache reads (e.g. Sonnet $3.75 write vs $0.30 read per Mtok), and writes are billed even if the cached block is never reused. The payoff only arrives on subsequent reads — so a healthy fleet shows cachereadtokens far exceeding cachewritetokens. When cache_reuse 70% strong, 40–70% moderate, > cache_read: short or one-shot sessions rarely recoup cache writes — note them.
- Stable, repeated context (system prompts, large files) should be cached once and reused; high churn defeats caching.
- Estimate the dollar impact of raising the hit rate to the next benchmark tier.
Output
Structured Markdown with tables. Currency as USD to 4 decimal places; rates as $/Mtok; percentages with ▲/▼ for any trend. Token counts with thousands separators.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: hoangsonww
- Source: hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://hoangsonww.github.io/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor/
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.