Install
$ agentstack add skill-hoangsonww-claude-code-agent-monitor-optimization-suggest ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Optimization Suggest
Generate data-driven optimization recommendations for Claude Code usage.
Input
The user provides: $ARGUMENTS
This may be:
- "all" or empty (default: comprehensive optimization scan)
- "cost" for cost reduction focus
- "speed" for performance/speed focus
- "quality" for error reduction focus
- "efficiency" for workflow efficiency focus
Procedure
- Gather optimization data from
http://localhost:4820:
GET /api/sessions?limit=200— session historyGET /api/analytics— tool and token analyticsGET /api/pricing/cost— cost dataGET /api/pricing— pricing rules for model comparison- Sample event streams for behavioral analysis
- Analyze optimization opportunities:
### 💰 Cost Optimization
- Model downgrade opportunities: Tasks completed with expensive models that could use cheaper ones
- Compare success rates per model per task type
- Calculate savings from model substitution
- Cache optimization: Sessions with low cache hit rates
- Identify sessions that could benefit from better prompt caching
- Early termination: Sessions that ran longer than needed
- Detect sessions where useful work completed well before session end
- Compaction reduction: Sessions hitting context limits
- Suggest breaking large tasks into smaller sessions
### ⚡ Speed Optimization
- Tool selection: Faster alternatives for commonly-used tool patterns
- Subagent parallelization: Tasks that could run in parallel
- Session planning: Better upfront context to reduce back-and-forth
- Preemptive context loading: Frequently needed files/context
### 🛡 Quality Optimization
- Error prevention: Common error patterns with preventive measures
- Tool reliability: Tools with high failure rates and alternatives
- Validation gaps: Sessions lacking verification steps
- Recovery strategies: Better error handling patterns
### 🔄 Workflow Optimization
- Session sizing: Optimal session scope based on historical success
- Task decomposition: Complex sessions that should be split
- Automation candidates: Repetitive workflows to automate
- Knowledge reuse: Patterns where previous session context could help
- Quantify each recommendation:
- Estimated impact (cost savings $, time savings %, error reduction %)
- Implementation effort (low/medium/high)
- Confidence level based on data available
- Priority score = Impact × Confidence / Effort
Output Format
Present as a prioritized optimization plan:
| # | Recommendation | Category | Impact | Effort | Priority | |---|---------------|----------|--------|--------|----------| | 1 | Specific action | 💰/⚡/🛡/🔄 | High | Low | ★★★★★ | | 2 | Specific action | ... | ... | ... | ★★★★☆ |
For the top 5 recommendations, include:
- Detailed explanation with supporting data
- Step-by-step implementation guide
- Expected before/after metrics
- How to measure success
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: hoangsonww
- Source: hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://hoangsonww.github.io/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor/
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.