AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Measure Results

skill-hungv47-meta-skills-measure-results · by hungv47

Ingest a launch/campaign's real post-publish results for ONE channel, produce a structured what-worked/what-failed read against that channel's playbook pack, and feed a dated entry back into the pack so the next launch compounds. Closes the metrics loop (pillar 3). Not for scoring a single organic post in an eval loop (use evaluate-content), paid-ad results (use evaluate-ad), short-form video (us…

No reviews yet
0 installs
16 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-hungv47-meta-skills-measure-results

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Measure Results? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Measure Results — Loop Closer

4 agents (metric-ingest → diagnosis → pack-feedback → critic) turn a channel's real launch results into a structured read and a dated entry written back into that channel's playbook pack, so the next launch on the channel starts from evidence, not a blank page. Capability: [routing.yaml](routing.yaml). Agents + rubric: [references/agent-manifest.md](references/agent-manifest.md). Method: [references/playbook.md](references/playbook.md).

Core question: Which specific pack tactic earned (or cost) the result — and what should the next launch on this channel keep, drop, or test?

Critical Gates — load first

  1. One channel per run. Multi-channel results = one run per channel (the pack is per-channel).
  2. Pack-grounded or transparent. Diagnose against the channel's pack (§3 signals, §5 playbook); if no pack covers the channel, say so and produce a general read — never fake channel attribution (legibility convention).
  3. Evidence, not vibes. Every "what worked" names the tactic + the number that supports it. No number → it's a hypothesis, labelled as one.
  4. Loop write-back is the point. A run that produces a read but writes nothing back to the pack/performance store has not closed the loop.

Before Starting

Apply [references/_shared/before-starting-check.md](references/_shared/before-starting-check.md). Then:

| Input | Source | Required? | |---|---|---| | Channel results (paste or path) | operator | Hard — the numbers to read | | Channel pack | references/_shared/platform-intelligence/[channel].md | Rec — the tactics to attribute against | | Launch artifact | plan-campaign / launch chain comms plan | Rec — the hypotheses being tested | | .forsvn/performance/*.tsv | prior runs | Opt — trend context |

Mode per [references/_shared/mode-resolver.md](references/_shared/mode-resolver.md). budget: standard. --fast → ingest + read, skip the trend layer; never skips the pack write-back or the critic. Pre-Dispatch per [references/procedures/pre-dispatch.md](references/procedures/pre-dispatch.md).

Quality Gate — 5 dimensions

Full rubric: [references/rubric.md](references/rubric.md).

  • [ ] Attribution — each result traced to a named pack tactic / ranking signal (not "it went well")
  • [ ] Falsifiability — claims carry the supporting number; hypotheses labelled
  • [ ] Honesty — failures named as plainly as wins (anti-sycophancy)
  • [ ] Actionability — a concrete keep/drop/test for the next launch
  • [ ] Write-back fidelity — the pack entry + performance row are accurate and dated

Pass ≥35/50 AND no dim 0. FAIL twice → BLOCKED, no write-back.

Artifact Contract

  • Path: docs/forsvn/artifacts/marketing/measure-results/[channel]-[YYYY-MM-DD]-[slug].md. Lifecycle: evaluation.
  • Frontmatter (12): skill, version, date, stack, type, id, review_surface, status, channel, pack_verified, applied_tactics, keywords.
  • Body: Results table (metric · value · vs-expected) · What worked (tactic + number) · What failed · Keep/Drop/Test · Hypothesis verdicts · Pack write-back block · Legibility (**Legibility — applied expertise** — pack measured-against + its §3/§5 signals the read used; convention: references/_shared/legibility-convention.md) · Critic verdict. Legibility only — measure-results produces a measurement, not a marketing artifact, so no ## Why this works block.
  • Side effects (on critic PASS): append a dated entry to the channel pack changelog (references/format-conventions.md § Pack write-back); append a row to .forsvn/performance/[channel].tsv; if a hosted key is present, mirror the result to the cross-session metrics feed (bun scripts/forsvn-hosted.ts metrics [channel] --worked "..." --failed "..." — POSTs /v1/metrics, best-effort, inert without a key, never blocks). Full contract: [references/format-conventions.md](references/format-conventions.md).

Routing + Dispatch

Sequential graph (metric-ingest → diagnosis → pack-feedback → critic). Dispatch + revision cycle: [references/procedures/dispatch-mechanics.md](references/procedures/dispatch-mechanics.md).

Chain Position

Prev: the launch chain (plan-campaign / publish-social) OR a raw results paste. Next: the next launch on this channel reads the updated pack (loop closed). Re-run: new results, corrected numbers, a second channel.

Deference: single organic post in a loop → evaluate-content; paid ad → evaluate-ad; short-form video → evaluate-shortform; landing page → evaluate-landing-page.

Anti-Patterns

[references/anti-patterns.md](references/anti-patterns.md) — 8 patterns (vanity-metric-only, sycophantic read, unattributed win, no write-back, multi-channel-in-one-run, faked attribution without a pack, hosted-post-blocks-run, overwriting pack tactics instead of appending). Re-read before write-back.

Durable Rules (protected)

Completion Status

  • DONE — read produced, critic ≥35, pack + performance write-back done.
  • DONEWITHCONCERNS — delivered; critic 25-34 OR a stale/absent pack (read shipped, attribution caveated).
  • BLOCKED — critic FAIL twice; no usable numbers; channel pack write would overwrite (needs operator).
  • NEEDS_CONTEXT — no results provided; recommend re-running after the launch has data.

Worked Example

Product Hunt launch read (rank 3, 412 upvotes → which §5 tactics earned it → keep/drop/test → pack changelog entry + hosted feed): [references/examples/measure-walkthrough.md](references/examples/measure-walkthrough.md).

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.