AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified Apache-2.0 Self-run

Tdmcp Quality Audit

skill-hybridlabor-api-bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills-tdmcp-quality-audit · by hybridlabor-api

Run or maintain the full tdmcp repo quality-audit team: command sweeps, all package/Makefile/CI gates, security review, usability/flow review, refactor/test-gap analysis, coverage hardening, QA, and follow-up fix waves. Use whenever the user asks for a complete audit, improve repo/code quality, test all commands, find security/usability failures, refactor debt, add missing tests, re-run the audit…

No reviews yet
0 installs
0 views
view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-hybridlabor-api-bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills-tdmcp-quality-audit

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-hybridlabor-api-bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills-tdmcp-quality-audit)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
today

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Tdmcp Quality Audit? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

tdmcp-quality-audit

Use this skill for broad repository quality campaigns. It coordinates existing tdmcp specialists instead of replacing them: tdmcp-test-coverage handles focused coverage waves, and td-feature-qa handles tool/CLI/docs/bridge boundary QA.

Execution mode: hybrid fan-out/fan-in

This environment runs coordinated sub-agents rather than TeamCreate. Spawn the independent auditors in parallel, then fan their reports into one lead-owned plan. Implementation happens in small waves after QA verifies the findings.

Agent roster

| Agent | Focus | Output | |---|---|---| | tdmcp-quality-audit-lead | scope, orchestration, shared edits, wave plan | _workspace/quality-audit/00_scope.md, 05_plan.md | | tdmcp-command-auditor | scripts, Makefile, CI, CLI command health | _workspace/quality-audit/01_commands.md | | tdmcp-security-auditor | trust boundaries, raw Python, env redaction, package safety | _workspace/quality-audit/02_security.md | | tdmcp-ux-flow-auditor | first-run, docs-to-command parity, CLI help/errors | _workspace/quality-audit/03_usability.md | | tdmcp-refactor-test-auditor | coverage gaps, weak tests, complexity, refactor seams | _workspace/quality-audit/04_refactor_tests.md | | tdmcp-quality-qa | verifies evidence and first patch wave | _workspace/quality-audit/06_qa.md |

Phase 0 - Context check

  1. Read AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, package.json, Makefile,

.github/workflows/*.yml, vitest.config.ts, and existing _workspace/quality-audit/ reports.

  1. Decide run mode:
  • no quality workspace: fresh audit;
  • existing reports + user asks to continue/fix/re-run: partial re-run;
  • new broad request: archive prior reports under

_workspace/quality-audit/archive// before a fresh audit.

  1. Check git status. Do not revert unrelated user changes.

Phase 1 - Scope and command policy

Create _workspace/quality-audit/00_scope.md with:

  • requested scope;
  • current branch and dirty-state summary;
  • commands that are safe one-shot;
  • commands requiring timeout;
  • commands requiring TouchDesigner, hardware, network, or credentials;
  • commands that are publish/destructive and must not run without explicit user

approval.

Command policy:

  • Select the command runner before executing gates:
  • if command -v rtk >/dev/null 2>&1 succeeds, use rtk for shell commands

and follow local repo instructions such as rtk proxy zsh -lc for pipelines or shell control flow;

  • if rtk is unavailable, record that fallback in 00_scope.md and run the

same commands through the normal shell/Codex exec path without failing the audit solely because the wrapper is missing.

  • Safe baseline: npm run typecheck, npm run build, `./node_modules/.bin/biome

check ., npm test, npm run validate:recipes, npm run test:bridge, npm run docs:build, make complexity, npm run deps:check, npm run coverage:harness`.

  • Classify before running: dev, start, docs:dev, docs:preview,

smoke:live, docs:clips, import:bottobot, prepublishOnly, npm publish, tag/push/version commands, and any server command.

  • Long-running commands need timeout, readiness probe, and cleanup.
  • TouchDesigner and hardware commands are UNVERIFIED when the bridge/device is

unavailable; they are not failures by themselves.

Phase 2 - Parallel audit

Spawn the four auditors in parallel:

  1. tdmcp-command-auditor
  2. tdmcp-security-auditor
  3. tdmcp-ux-flow-auditor
  4. tdmcp-refactor-test-auditor

Each report must use PASS / FAIL / UNVERIFIED buckets and include file:line or command evidence. Avoid generic recommendations that cannot become a patch or a test.

Phase 3 - Synthesis

The lead reads all reports and writes _workspace/quality-audit/05_plan.md:

  • deduped findings;
  • severity and confidence;
  • first safe patch wave;
  • deferred items requiring TD, hardware, network, or user credentials;
  • suggested tests and exact commands;
  • owner for each item.

Patch waves should be small:

  • Wave A: regression tests for concrete security/CLI/tool behavior.
  • Wave B: behavior-preserving refactors guarded by tests.
  • Wave C: command/CI/docs harness improvements.
  • Wave D: live TouchDesigner/hardware verification.

Phase 4 - QA before edits

Run tdmcp-quality-qa against the reports. It must reject:

  • claims without evidence;
  • command passes with no command output;
  • weakened test thresholds;
  • broad rewrites without failing tests or measurable risk;
  • unverified live checks reported as passing.

Phase 5 - Implement a wave

Only after QA, implement the smallest useful wave. For coverage-heavy work, invoke tdmcp-test-coverage and keep writers on disjoint test files. For boundary quality issues, invoke td-feature-qa. After edits, run narrow tests first, then the relevant gates from Phase 1.

Phase 6 - Final report

Update _workspace/quality-audit/06_qa.md with final command results and report:

  • what was fixed;
  • what was tested;
  • what remains FAIL;
  • what remains UNVERIFIED and why;
  • next wave recommendation.

Error handling

  • Retry deterministic local command failures once after checking dependencies.
  • If dependencies are missing, run npm ci only when appropriate for the checkout

and record that it was required.

  • If generated files change from docs/build commands, inspect the diff before

keeping it.

  • Do not run publish, tag, push, credential, destructive, or hardware-control

commands without explicit approval.

Test scenarios

Normal flow: user asks for a complete quality audit. The lead creates 00_scope.md, four auditors run in parallel, QA verifies evidence, Wave A adds two CLI/config security regression tests, and gates pass. The final report keeps TouchDesigner live smoke as UNVERIFIED if the bridge is offline.

Error flow: docs:build regenerates docs/reference/tools.md and fails because a tool schema is broken. The command auditor records FAIL, the lead routes the boundary to td-feature-qa, a focused test locks the schema behavior, docs build is re-run, and the final report names the fixed file and command.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.