Linkedin Infographic Review

LinkedIn Infographic Review

Purpose

Run a focused pre-publish critique on an existing LinkedIn infographic. Diagnose what is blocking publication, separate required fixes from optional polish, and avoid turning review into an unrelated redesign.

Inputs

Use the finished HTML, GIF, PNG, screenshots, caption, source material, or evidence the user provides.

If evidence required to validate a factual claim is unavailable, mark that claim as unverified instead of inventing support.

Review order

1. Static composition

Inspect the full artboard before looking at small details.

Check:

• one dominant visual anchor is obvious within two seconds
• the page has a clear macro rhythm from hook to visual relationship to takeaway
• the composition is not top-heavy
• there is no unexplained dead zone near the footer
• the footer belongs to the composition instead of floating far below it
• text remains readable at feed scale
• copy density is solved through hierarchy and editing rather than tiny type

For a 1080x1350 artboard, treat an unexplained vertical gap greater than 120px between the main composition and footer/takeaway as a blocking warning unless negative space has an intentional visual job.

2. Component grammar

Reject generic component patterns when they replace art direction.

Check:

• no more than two bordered containment levels
• repeated cards exist only when repetition is meaningful
• pills, badges, status chips, and tiny uppercase labels have semantic jobs
• no fake dashboards, fake analytics, fake proof bars, or invented metrics
• visual structure fits the story rather than the easiest HTML pattern

3. Copy and evidence

Check:

• one primary message
• hook is specific to the subject
• body copy adds mechanism, evidence, comparison, consequence, or action
• takeaway completes the idea instead of repeating the headline
• claims, numbers, logos, product states, and proof are supported by supplied material
• no generic filler or exaggerated marketing language

4. Motion when animated

Every meaningful animation must explain at least one of:

• what should I read next?
• what changed?
• where did this item travel?
• which state is active?

Fail decorative motion when it dominates the explanatory motion. Fail motion-on-weak-still when the composition itself should be repaired before animation.

Inspect frame zero, a representative mid-state, the final state, and the loop seam.

5. Failure taxonomy

Return PASS or FAIL for each:

• top-heavy-composition
• bottom-dead-zone
• nested-card-density
• generic-ui-grammar
• weak-macro-rhythm
• weak-visual-anchor
• footer-detachment
• motion-on-weak-still
• decorative-motion
• feed-scale-legibility

Output

Return:

1. verdict: PASS, FAIL:fixable, or HOLD
2. blocking findings
3. top three repair actions in priority order
4. advisory polish, if any
5. evidence limitations
6. motion/render notes when applicable

Do not return PASS while a severe blocking finding remains.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

• Author: imMamdouhaboammar
• Source: imMamdouhaboammar/linkedin-animated-infographics
• License: MIT

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.