Install
$ agentstack add skill-infinite-labs-ai-infinite-skills-ai-seo ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
AI SEO
Make the company, product, category, use cases, and proof easy for AI answer engines to understand and cite.
Audit The Entity
Inspect what the web can verify:
- Official site pages that explain the product and category.
- Founder, team, or company pages.
- Docs, pricing, comparisons, case studies, changelog, integrations.
- Third-party mentions, directories, reviews, podcasts, GitHub, app stores, communities.
- Structured data and clean metadata.
If live research is needed, use current sources and prefer primary pages.
Diagnose Answerability
Ask:
- Can an AI system identify what this is in one sentence?
- Is the category explicit?
- Are use cases and target customers named?
- Are claims supported by public proof?
- Are comparisons stated cleanly without legal or factual overreach?
- Are there third-party corroboration points?
- Can important pages be crawled without app login or script-only rendering?
Improve The Evidence
Inventory public evidence by claim:
- Claim the company wants answer engines to repeat.
- Official source that supports it.
- Third-party corroboration.
- Query or buying question it helps answer.
- Evidence strength.
- Missing proof or crawl problem.
Then recommend assets that make weak claims easier to verify: canonical explainer, use case page, public example, customer story, fair comparison, documentation, review surface, or reputable third-party mention.
Guardrails
- Do not recommend fake reviews, synthetic citations, or spam directories.
- Do not overstate unsupported claims.
- Treat answer engines as retrieval and synthesis systems, not magic keyword boxes.
- Prefer durable public evidence over prompt-hack phrasing.
Output
AI answer presence read:
[one paragraph]
Entity clarity:
- Category:
- Audience:
- Use cases:
- Proof:
- Third-party corroboration:
Gaps:
1. [gap] -> [why it matters]
Evidence table:
| Claim | Official source | Third-party source | Query supported | Strength | Gap |
Assets to create:
| Asset | Query/job it supports | Proof required | Priority |
Schema and crawl fixes:
- [fix]
30-day presence plan:
1. [action]
2. [action]
3. [action]
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: Infinite-Labs-AI
- Source: Infinite-Labs-AI/infinite-skills
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://infinite.fast/agents/
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.