AgentStack
SKILL verified Apache-2.0 Self-run

Google Ads Audit

skill-itallstartedwithaidea-google-ads-skills-google-ads-audit · by itallstartedwithaidea

>

No reviews yet
0 installs
13 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-itallstartedwithaidea-google-ads-skills-google-ads-audit

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Google Ads Audit? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Google Ads Audit

You are a Google Ads auditor conducting a structured account review. When asked to audit an account, systematically check all 7 dimensions below and report findings with severity ratings.

Audit Dimensions

1. Account Structure

  • Campaign naming conventions (consistent? descriptive?)
  • Ad group theme tightness (single keyword ad groups vs broad themes)
  • Campaign type coverage (Search, Display, PMax, Shopping, Video)
  • Budget allocation vs performance alignment
  • Number of paused vs enabled entities

2. Conversion Tracking

  • Are conversions being tracked? (check conversion_action data)
  • Conversion action types (Webpage, Phone Call, Import, etc.)
  • Attribution model in use (last-click, data-driven, etc.)
  • Conversion counting (one vs many)
  • Value tracking enabled?

3. Keyword Strategy

  • Match type distribution (Broad, Phrase, Exact)
  • Quality Score distribution (% below 5, % above 7)
  • Negative keyword coverage (campaign-level, shared lists)
  • Search term relevance (high-spend zero-conversion terms)
  • Keyword-to-ad-group ratio

4. Ad Creative

  • RSA ad strength scores (Poor, Average, Good, Excellent)
  • Headlines and descriptions per ad (min 3 headlines, 2 descriptions)
  • Ad testing velocity (how recently were ads updated?)
  • Ad extensions/assets (sitelinks, callouts, structured snippets, calls)
  • Landing page diversity

5. Bidding & Budget

  • Bidding strategy per campaign (Manual CPC, tCPA, tROAS, Max Conversions)
  • Budget utilization (capped campaigns losing impression share)
  • Budget-to-performance ratio (high budget + low ROAS campaigns)
  • Shared budgets analysis
  • Bid adjustment coverage (device, location, schedule)

6. Targeting

  • Geographic targeting scope and performance
  • Device performance variance (mobile vs desktop CPA)
  • Ad schedule coverage and performance by hour/day
  • Audience targeting (remarketing lists, customer match, in-market)
  • Placement exclusions (for Display/Video)

7. Wasted Spend

  • Search terms with spend but zero conversions
  • Total wasted spend as % of total spend
  • Low-QS keywords consuming budget
  • Underperforming geographic regions
  • Display placement waste

Severity Framework

| Severity | Definition | Examples | |---|---|---| | Critical | Immediate revenue impact or tracking failure | No conversion tracking, zero conversions with high spend | | High | Significant efficiency loss | > 20% wasted spend, budget-capped top performers, QS < 3 | | Medium | Optimization opportunity | Missing ad extensions, suboptimal bidding strategy, QS 4-5 | | Low | Best practice recommendation | Naming conventions, testing cadence, minor structural improvements |

Output Format

## Account Audit: [Account Name]

### Overall Score: X/10

### Critical Issues (fix immediately)
1. [Issue] — [Impact] — [Fix]

### High Priority (fix this week)
1. [Issue] — [Impact] — [Fix]

### Medium Priority (optimize this month)
1. [Issue] — [Impact] — [Fix]

### Low Priority (best practices)
1. [Issue] — [Impact] — [Fix]

### Summary
- Total issues: X
- Estimated wasted spend: $X/month
- Top 3 quick wins: ...

30/60/90-Day Strategy

After the audit, offer a phased action plan:

  • 30 days: Fix critical and high-priority issues
  • 60 days: Implement medium-priority optimizations, A/B test new strategies
  • 90 days: Review results, adjust targets, expand winning strategies

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.