Install
$ agentstack add skill-jamestorrevillas-dev-skills-problem-solving ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Problem Solving
Core Mindset
Don't solve the problem you think you have. Solve the problem you actually have.
Most wasted effort in software comes from solving the wrong problem confidently. The first step is always to verify the problem definition.
The Problem-Solving Framework
1. DEFINE — What is the actual problem? (not the symptom)
2. CONSTRAIN — What are the boundaries? (must-haves, non-negotiables)
3. DECOMPOSE — Break into smaller sub-problems
4. EXPLORE — Generate multiple approaches before committing
5. DECIDE — Choose based on explicit criteria
6. EXECUTE — Implement the chosen approach
7. REVIEW — Did it solve the right problem?
First Principles Thinking
Instead of reasoning by analogy ("how do others do this?"), break the problem down to fundamental truths:
1. What do we know for certain is true about this problem?
2. What assumptions am I making that might be wrong?
3. If I had to rebuild this from scratch knowing only those truths,
what would I build?
Use when: existing solutions feel wrong, you're stuck in conventional thinking, or you need a breakthrough.
Decomposition Techniques
Top-Down
Start with the goal, break into sub-goals:
Goal: Build a user auth system
└── Registration flow
├── Form validation
├── Password hashing
└── Email verification
└── Login flow
├── Credential verification
├── Session/token creation
└── Remember me
└── Security hardening
├── Rate limiting
├── Brute force protection
└── Audit logging
MECE (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive)
Ensure sub-problems don't overlap and together cover the whole problem.
When You're Stuck
- Restate the problem in different words
- Ask "what would need to be true" for each possible solution to work
- Invert — what would make this definitely fail? Design away from that.
- Simplify — solve a simpler version first, then generalize
- Time-box exploration — 30 min max before asking for help
Trade-Off Analysis
For every major decision, document:
Option A: [description]
Pros: [benefits]
Cons: [costs/risks]
Best when: [conditions]
Option B: [description]
Pros: [benefits]
Cons: [costs/risks]
Best when: [conditions]
Decision: [chosen option]
Reason: [why this fits the current constraints]
Revisit if: [conditions that would change the decision]
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: jamestorrevillas
- Source: jamestorrevillas/dev-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.