AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Sprint Planning

skill-jamestorrevillas-dev-skills-sprint-planning · by jamestorrevillas

Use this skill for Agile and Scrum workflows — writing user stories, defining acceptance criteria, estimating story points, generating sprint goals, running retrospectives, backlog grooming, standup updates, or onboarding documentation. Trigger on keywords: user story, sprint, backlog, story points, acceptance criteria, retrospective, standup, DSU, scrum, agile, estimation, epic, ticket.

No reviews yet
0 installs
17 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-jamestorrevillas-dev-skills-sprint-planning

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-jamestorrevillas-dev-skills-sprint-planning)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
4mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Sprint Planning? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Sprint Planning

User Story Writing

Format

As a [type of user],
I want [goal or action],
So that [benefit or value].

Acceptance Criteria Format (Gherkin)

Given [initial context or precondition],
When [action or event occurs],
Then [expected outcome].

User Story Example

I want to reset my password via email, So that I can regain access to my account if I forget my credentials.

Acceptance Criteria: Given I am on the login page, When I click "Forgot Password" and enter my email, Then I should receive a password reset email within 2 minutes.

Given I click the reset link in the email, When I enter a new valid password, Then my password should be updated and I should be logged in.


### Story Quality Checklist (INVEST)
- **I**ndependent — can be developed without depending on other stories
- **N**egotiable — details can be discussed
- **V**aluable — delivers value to a user or stakeholder
- **E**stimable — team can estimate it
- **S**mall — completable in one sprint
- **T**estable — acceptance criteria are verifiable

---

## Story Point Estimation

### Scale Reference
| Points | Size | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | XS | Trivial change, well-understood, < 2 hours |
| 3 | S | Small, clear scope, half a day |
| 5 | M | Medium complexity, 1–2 days |
| 8 | L | Complex, cross-cutting, 3–4 days |
| 13 | XL | Very complex or uncertain, needs breakdown |

### Estimation Rules
- If a story is 13 points, break it down into smaller stories
- Points represent **complexity + uncertainty**, not just time
- Estimate as a team — avoid anchoring bias (don't share estimates until everyone reveals simultaneously)
- Use historical velocity to validate sprint capacity

---

## Sprint Goal Formula (FOCUS Model)

A good sprint goal is:
- **F**un — memorable and motivating title
- **O**utcome-oriented — what value is delivered, not what tasks are done
- **C**ollaborative — agreed upon by the whole team
- **U**ltimate — answers "why are we doing this sprint?"
- **S**ingular — one clear goal, not a list

### Sprint Goal Example
By end of sprint, users can sign up, log in, and access their dashboard —
giving us a working auth system to build all future features on.

Standup / DSU Format

Structure

Yesterday: [What I completed]
Today: [What I'm working on]
Blockers: [Anything blocking me — or "none"]

Example (Taglish style for Filipino dev teams)

Good afternoon. 
Yesterday, na-finish ko yung unit tests para sa [feature]. 
Today, mag-a-address ako ng review comments sa [PR] tapos mag-s-start ng [next task].
Wala naman blocker at the moment.
That's all from me, [name].

Backlog Grooming

Grooming Checklist (per story)

  • [ ] Story is written in proper user story format
  • [ ] Acceptance criteria are defined and testable
  • [ ] Story is estimated
  • [ ] Dependencies are identified and documented
  • [ ] Story is small enough to complete in one sprint
  • [ ] Definition of Done is clear

Prioritization Framework (MoSCoW)

| Priority | Meaning | |---|---| | Must Have | Critical for this sprint/release | | Should Have | Important but not critical | | Could Have | Nice to have if time permits | | Won't Have | Out of scope for now |


Sprint Retrospective

Format (Start / Stop / Continue)

START: Things we should start doing
STOP: Things we should stop doing  
CONTINUE: Things that are working well

AI-Assisted Retrospective Prompt

Given these sprint outcomes: [outcomes]
And these blockers encountered: [blockers]
Generate a Start/Stop/Continue retrospective with:
- 2-3 items per category
- Actionable items, not vague complaints
- One owner assigned per action item

Onboarding Documentation

New Developer Onboarding Checklist

## Day 1
- [ ] Dev environment setup (see README)
- [ ] Access to all required systems (GitHub, Jira, Slack, cloud console)
- [ ] First PR — fix a small bug or add a test

## Week 1
- [ ] Understand the domain and architecture (see ARCHITECTURE.md)
- [ ] Shadow a code review
- [ ] Complete first solo story (1–3 points)

## Month 1
- [ ] Own a feature end-to-end
- [ ] Contribute to architecture discussion
- [ ] Give feedback in retrospective

Repository Intelligence File (CLAUDE.md / copilot-instructions.md)

Every repo should have an onboarding file that answers:

  1. What does this project do?
  2. How do I set it up locally?
  3. What are the coding conventions?
  4. How do I run tests?
  5. How do I deploy?
  6. Who do I ask for help?

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.