AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Tech Research

skill-jamestorrevillas-dev-skills-tech-research · by jamestorrevillas

Use this skill when evaluating technologies, comparing frameworks, making build vs buy decisions, researching best practices, or synthesizing information for a technical decision. Trigger on keywords: should I use, which framework, technology comparison, evaluate, build vs buy, what's the best tool for, research this technology, is X worth learning.

No reviews yet
0 installs
10 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-jamestorrevillas-dev-skills-tech-research

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-jamestorrevillas-dev-skills-tech-research)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
4mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Tech Research? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Technology Research

Research Process

1. DEFINE    — What specific decision are we making?
2. CONSTRAIN — What are the non-negotiables? (team skills, budget, timeline)
3. GATHER    — Collect data from quality sources
4. COMPARE   — Evaluate options against the same criteria
5. DECIDE    — Choose with explicit reasoning
6. DOCUMENT  — Record the decision for future reference

Technology Evaluation Criteria

| Criterion | What to Look For | |---|---| | Problem Fit | Does it actually solve YOUR problem? | | Maturity | Production-proven? Version 1.x or 0.x? | | Community | Active GitHub, Stack Overflow, Discord | | Maintenance | Last commit? Open issues? Response time? | | Performance | Benchmarks relevant to your scale | | Learning Curve | Team familiarity, documentation quality | | Ecosystem | Plugins, integrations, tooling | | Exit Cost | How hard to migrate away? | | License | MIT/Apache (permissive) vs GPL vs commercial |


Source Quality Hierarchy

  1. Official documentation — authoritative, check version
  2. Production case studies — most reliable, hardest to find
  3. Benchmark comparisons — verify the benchmark matches your use case
  4. Respected technical blogs — check date and author credentials
  5. Reddit / Hacker News — good for real-world sentiment and gotchas
  6. YouTube tutorials — useful for learning, not for decisions

Always check the date. A 2-year-old comparison may be obsolete.


Decision Document Template

## Technology Decision: [topic]

**Date:** | **Decided by:**

### Context
[What problem are we solving? What are our constraints?]

### Options Evaluated
| Criterion | Option A | Option B | Option C |
|-----------|---------|---------|---------|
| Problem Fit | | | |
| Maturity | | | |
| Team Familiarity | | | |
| Performance | | | |
| Long-term Risk | | | |

### Decision
**Chosen:** [option]

**Reasoning:** [why this fits our specific context]

**Trade-offs accepted:** [what we give up]

**Revisit if:** [conditions that would change this decision]

Build vs Buy Framework

Build when:

  • This IS your core competitive differentiator
  • No existing solution fits well enough (>40% custom needed)
  • You have the expertise and time to maintain it

Buy / Use OSS when:

  • It's infrastructure (auth, payments, email, queues)
  • Time-to-market is critical
  • Your users don't care who built the underlying tool
  • Maintenance would distract from core product

The hidden cost of building: every line you write, you now own forever.


Staying Current

Trusted sources for staying up to date:

  • GitHub Trending (weekly)
  • State of JS / State of CSS surveys (annual)
  • Stack Overflow Developer Survey (annual)
  • Official release blogs of tools you use
  • Hacker News "Who's Hiring" (for industry signals)
  • Thoughtworks Technology Radar (strategic view)

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.