Install
$ agentstack add skill-jamestorrevillas-dev-skills-threat-modeling ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Threat Modeling
Core Mindset
Think like an attacker, build like a defender.
Threat modeling is done BEFORE building, not after. Security retrofitted is always weaker and more expensive than security designed in.
The STRIDE Framework
For every component, ask: can an attacker do this?
| Threat | Definition | Example | |---|---|---| | Spoofing | Pretend to be someone else | Forged JWT token | | Tampering | Modify data in transit or at rest | SQL injection, request body modification | | Repudiation | Deny performing an action | No audit log of who deleted a record | | Information Disclosure | Access data they shouldn't | Over-fetching API, verbose error messages | | Denial of Service | Make system unavailable | No rate limiting on auth endpoint | | Elevation of Privilege | Gain unauthorized access level | IDOR (accessing other users' data) |
Threat Modeling Process
1. DEFINE SCOPE — What are we modeling? (feature, service, system)
2. IDENTIFY ASSETS — What are we protecting? (data, services, credentials)
3. DRAW DATA FLOWS — How does data move through the system?
4. IDENTIFY THREATS — Apply STRIDE to each component and data flow
5. ASSESS RISK — Likelihood × Impact for each threat
6. MITIGATE — For each high-risk threat, define a control
7. VERIFY — Confirm controls are implemented and working
Attack Surface Analysis
For any new feature, identify:
- Entry points — Where does user input enter the system?
- Trust boundaries — Where does data cross privilege levels?
- Data stores — What sensitive data is stored and where?
- External dependencies — What third-party services are called?
OWASP Top 10 (Quick Reference)
| # | Threat | Quick Check | |---|---|---| | A01 | Broken Access Control | Is every endpoint checking authorization? | | A02 | Cryptographic Failures | Is sensitive data encrypted at rest and in transit? | | A03 | Injection | Are all queries parameterized? All inputs validated? | | A04 | Insecure Design | Was security considered in the design phase? | | A05 | Security Misconfiguration | Are defaults hardened? Are secrets in env vars? | | A06 | Vulnerable Components | Are dependencies up to date? Any known CVEs? | | A07 | Auth Failures | Is auth implemented correctly? Session management secure? | | A08 | Software Integrity | Are supply chain and build pipeline trusted? | | A09 | Logging Failures | Are security events logged? Are logs protected? | | A10 | SSRF | Can users cause server to make requests to internal resources? |
Security Design Principles
- Least Privilege — Every component gets only the permissions it needs
- Defense in Depth — Multiple layers of security, no single point of failure
- Fail Secure — When something breaks, it should fail closed (deny access), not open
- Zero Trust — Never trust, always verify — even internal services
- Minimize Attack Surface — Less exposed = less exploitable
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: jamestorrevillas
- Source: jamestorrevillas/dev-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.