AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Drafti Feature

skill-jazz1x-harnish-drafti-feature · by jazz1x

>

No reviews yet
0 installs
32 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-jazz1x-harnish-drafti-feature

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-jazz1x-harnish-drafti-feature)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
4mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Drafti Feature? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

drafti-feature — Planning to Implementation Spec PRD

> Takes planning requirements and produces an implementation spec PRD focused on "how to build it."

Bash Convention

Each Bash tool invocation is a fresh subshell. Every bash block re-declares HARNISH_ROOT="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}" inline; no persistent variables.

Skill Chain

Can be invoked independently (planning doc required). Follow-up: "start implementation after review" → impl, or "/galmuri:ralphi to verify PRD consistency" → galmuri:ralphi (sibling plugin).

Step 1: Requirement Parsing

Extract 4 items from the planning document:

| Item | Content | |-----|------| | Core Feature | User-visible changes (1~3 lines) | | Success Metrics | KPI/goals (numeric or conditional) | | User Flow | Happy path + branches | | Non-Functional Requirements | Performance, security, accessibility |

Gate: all 4 items must be present before proceeding.

  • 0 missing → proceed to Step 2.
  • 1+ missing → ask the user for the missing items. Do not assume defaults. Re-evaluate after the user replies; if still missing → re-ask.

Step 2: Existing Asset Query

Extract 3~5 core keywords, then:

HARNISH_ROOT="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}"
if [[ -n "$HARNISH_ROOT" ]]; then
  bash "$HARNISH_ROOT/scripts/query-assets.sh" \
    --tags "{keywords}" --format inject \
    --base-dir "$(pwd)/.harnish"
fi

If assets found, use as reference; if none, proceed anyway.

Step 3: Codebase Exploration

Detect the language from project config files (package.json, pyproject.toml, go.mod, etc.), then explore affected files using core keywords.

  1. Keyword search: Find related code files
  2. Filename patterns: Find related components/modules
  3. Data models: Find type definitions/interfaces/classes

Result: Affected file list + whether data model changes are needed → reflect in PRD §4.

Step 4: Feature Flag Assessment (Optional)

Not all features need a flag. Design one only when the conditions below apply.

| Condition | Flag Needed | Not Needed | |------|-----------|--------| | User-facing service, gradual rollout needed | ✓ | | | High-risk features such as payments/finance | ✓ | | | Internal tools, CLI, libraries, infrastructure | | ✓ | | Simple bug fixes, refactoring | | ✓ |

If flag needed → read references/feature-flag-patterns.md and:

  • Flag key: {feature_name}_enabled
  • Select rollout strategy (percentage/segment/manual)
  • Kill switch conditions (error rate > 1%, p99 > 500ms, etc.)
  • Rollback plan

If not needed → §2 (Flag design) is omitted from the output PRD. Section numbers §1, §3, §4, ... remain unchanged (do not renumber). Proceed to Step 5.

Step 5: Implementation Spec Writing

Foundation for task decomposition. Be specific about file paths, functions, and branch locations.

§4.1 Affected files:

| File Path | Change Type | Description | Flag Branch |

§4.2 Functions/Components: Input → Behavior → Output

§4.3 Flag branch locations (only when flag exists): File | Function | Location | Condition

§4.4 Data model (only when DB changes exist): Added fields + migration + rollback safety

Read references/prd-template.md and write accordingly.

Step 6: Edge Cases + Tests

When flag exists: Separate into ON/OFF/partial rollout cases When no flag: Separate into normal/error/boundary value cases

§6 Test Criteria (Acceptance Criteria):

  • Verify new feature behavior
  • Verify existing feature regression
  • (When flag exists) 100% restoration of existing behavior after rollback

Step 7: Save + Asset Recording

HITL (before any file write): > "PRD draft ready: §{sections present} ({with/without} flag). Save to docs/prd-{slug}.md? (y / n / edit-slug)" > > If docs/prd-{slug}.md already exists, the prompt becomes: "docs/prd-{slug}.md already exists. (overwrite / n / new-slug)"y is not offered. Treat overwrite as explicit destructive confirmation.

  • n → end. PRD not saved.
  • edit-slug → ask for slug, then y (re-check existence after slug change).
  • y → proceed with save below.
  • overwrite → existing file is replaced without backup (user has explicitly confirmed destructive write).
  • new-slug → ask for a different slug, then re-check existence; repeat until a free slug is chosen or user picks n/overwrite.

Save PRD (only after y or overwrite):

mkdir -p docs/
# Write PRD content to docs/prd-{slug}.md

PRD section structure: | Section | Content | |------|------| | §1 | Planning summary | | §2 | Flag design ← omitted when flag is not needed; numbering of §3+ unchanged | | §3 | Technical design (affected files) | | §4 | Implementation spec | | §5 | Edge cases | | §6 | Test criteria | | §7 | Guardrails | | §8 | Asset references |

Asset recording:

HARNISH_ROOT="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}"
if [[ -n "$HARNISH_ROOT" ]]; then
  bash "$HARNISH_ROOT/scripts/record-asset.sh" \
    --type pattern --tags "{keywords}" \
    --title "{feature name} implementation pattern" --content "{summary}" \
    --base-dir "$(pwd)/.harnish"
fi

Step 8: Completion

✅ PRD generated: docs/prd-{slug}.md
Includes: §4 Implementation spec / §6 Test criteria / §7 Guardrails
Next: "start implementation" after review, or /galmuri:ralphi for consistency check.

Distinction from drafti-architect

| User Request | Judgment | Skill | |-----------|------|------| | "Create PRD based on this planning doc" | Planning document exists | → drafti-feature | | "How should I design this problem" | No planning doc | → drafti-architect |

Context Budget

| When | Reads | |---|---| | Step 1 (Parsing) | Planning document, project config files (package.json, pyproject.toml, etc.) | | Step 2 (Asset query) | .harnish/assets/*.jsonl filtered by tags. Skip if .harnish/ absent. | | Step 3 (Codebase) | Keyword-matched files only. No full project tree read. | | Step 4 (Flag) | references/feature-flag-patterns.md (only if flag needed) | | Step 5 (Spec) | references/prd-template.md | | Step 6 (Tests) | None | | Step 7 (Save + record) | None (writes only — docs/prd-*.md and .harnish/assets/*.jsonl) |

Load at most 1 reference at a time; switch when moving phase.

Prohibited

  • Guessing requirements without a planning doc (use drafti-architect instead)
  • Forcing unnecessary feature flags (follow the Step 4 assessment table)
  • Saving PRD without explicit user confirmation in Step 7
  • Saving over an existing docs/prd-*.md without explicit overwrite confirmation
  • Proceeding past Step 1 with any of the 4 required items missing
  • Loading 2 references simultaneously

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.