AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Seo Audit Full

skill-jeffli1993-seo-audit-skill-seo-audit-full · by JeffLi1993

>-

No reviews yet
0 installs
1 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-jeffli1993-seo-audit-skill-seo-audit-full

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-jeffli1993-seo-audit-skill-seo-audit-full)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
1mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Seo Audit Full? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

seo-audit-full — Advanced Full SEO Audit

This skill runs a full single-page SEO audit from the seo-audit-full directory. It does not route to seo-audit when only a URL is provided.


When to Use This Skill

Use seo-audit-full when the user asks for:

  • "seo-audit-full"
  • "full SEO audit"
  • "advanced SEO audit"
  • "technical SEO audit"
  • "deep audit"
  • "comprehensive SEO review"
  • "audit everything"

URL-only requests are valid. When external datasets are not supplied, run the full public-signal workflow and clearly note missing data sources in the report.


Input Expected

| Input | Required | Notes | |-------|----------|-------| | Page URL | Yes | The primary page to audit | | Primary keyword | Recommended | Improves content relevance scoring | | PageSpeed API key | Yes | Required for full audit PageSpeed checks. Ask at the start and do not run PageSpeed without it. | | Raw HTML or page content | Optional | Enables more accurate content checks when supplied | | GSC / crawl / analytics data | Optional | Include when supplied, otherwise mark unavailable | | Competitor benchmark data | Optional | Include when supplied |

At the start of a full audit, ask the user for a PageSpeed Insights API key:

For PageSpeed checks, please provide a Google PageSpeed Insights API key.
Get one here: https://developers.google.com/speed/docs/insights/v5/get-started
Open "Acquiring and using an API key" → "Get a Key".
If you do not provide one, I will stop before running the full audit because
PageSpeed is a required full-audit module.

Do not run seo-audit-full PageSpeed checks without a PageSpeed API key supplied by --api-key, PAGESPEED_API_KEY, or GOOGLE_PAGESPEED_API_KEY. If the key is missing, stop and ask the user to configure it instead of rendering a full report with missing PageSpeed data.


Architecture: Full = Core + Performance + Advanced

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  seo-audit-full Workflow                                    │
│                                                             │
│  Phase 1: Run core scripts (./scripts/)                     │
│  ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐   │
│  │  check-site.py      → robots.txt, sitemap, 404, URL  │   │
│  │  check-page.py      → title, H1, meta desc, slug     │   │
│  │  check-schema.py    → JSON-LD validation              │   │
│  │  fetch-page.py      → raw HTML for analysis           │   │
│  └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘   │
│                          ↓                                  │
│  Phase 2: Run performance + full-only scripts (./scripts/)  │
│  ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐   │
│  │  check-pagespeed.py → Lighthouse scores + metrics     │   │
│  │  check-social.py    → OG Tags + Twitter Card          │   │
│  │  (more scripts added here as modules grow)            │   │
│  └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘   │
│                          ↓                                  │
│  Phase 3: LLM-only advanced checks                         │
│  ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐   │
│  │  E-E-A-T content quality scoring                      │   │
│  │  Duplicate content signals                            │   │
│  │  Anchor text quality assessment                       │   │
│  └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘   │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Output

Produce an Advanced Full SEO Audit Report by filling the template at [assets/report-template.html](assets/report-template.html), then save it to a file — never print raw HTML to the terminal.

File naming: reports/--full-audit.html

https://example.com/blog/best-tools → reports/example-com-blog-best-tools-full-audit.html
https://example.com/                → reports/example-com-full-audit.html

After saving, tell the user:

✅ Full Report saved → reports/example-com-full-audit.html
   Open it now? (yes / no)

If yes → run: open reports/example-com-full-audit.html

Template placeholders — fill each independently:

| Placeholder | Content | |---|---| | {{summary_verdict}} | One sentence: total checks run, how many failed/warned/passed | | {{summary_critical_html}} | ` per critical item, or None | | {{summarywarningshtml}} | per warning item, or None | | {{summarypassinghtml}} | per passing check, or None | | {{pagespeedcheckshtml}} | Full PageSpeed module using check-pagespeed.py output | | {{sitecheckshtml}} | Site-level check tables | | {{eeatcheckshtml}} | E-E-A-T trust page table | | {{pagecheckshtml}} | Page-level check tables, including full-only additions | | {{priorityactionshtml}} | Ordered priority action list | | {{insights_html}}` | Optional finding walkthrough cards |


Scripts

Run full scripts from this directory. All output is structured JSON — use it directly as evidence.

Dependencies: pip install requests

Phase 1: Core scripts

# 1. site-level checks (robots.txt + sitemap.xml + 404 + URL canonicalization)
python scripts/check-site.py https://example.com

# 2. page-level checks (H1, title, meta description, canonical, URL slug)
python scripts/check-page.py https://example.com --keyword "primary keyword"

# 3. fetch raw HTML for downstream scripts
python scripts/fetch-page.py https://example.com --output /tmp/page.html

# 4. JSON-LD schema validation
python scripts/check-schema.py --file /tmp/page.html

Phase 2: Full-only scripts

# 5. PageSpeed / Lighthouse checks
python scripts/check-pagespeed.py https://example.com --strategy mobile --timeout 180 --api-key "USER_PROVIDED_KEY"
# If no key was provided, do not run this command. Ask the user to configure a PageSpeed API key first.

# 6. Social tags: OG + Twitter Card validation
python scripts/check-social.py --file /tmp/page.html
# Or directly from URL:
python scripts/check-social.py https://example.com

Each script exits with code 0 (all pass/warn) or 1 (any fail/error).

PageSpeed can take 200 seconds. Use a 180-second timeout by default. If it still times out, mark the Page Speed module as error and state that the PageSpeed API timed out; do not treat that as confirmed page performance failure. If PageSpeed fails because Google returns a quota/API-key error after a key was provided, keep the audit running and render the PageSpeed module as error with this instruction: Get a PageSpeed API key at https://developers.google.com/speed/docs/insights/v5/get-started → "Acquiring and using an API key" → "Get a Key".


Scope — Full Audit Check Whitelist

Full runs its own core checks plus the full-only items marked ★ below.

Site-Level Checks (in {{site_checks_html}})

Core checks:

  • Sitemap URL Inventory · Staging Subdomain Indexation · robots.txt · sitemap.xml · 404 Handling · URL Canonicalization · i18n / hreflang

Staging Subdomain Indexation rules:

  • Check common staging/test hosts before robots.txt: test., staging., dev., preview., beta., uat.
  • Fail when a staging/test subdomain is publicly accessible, closely mirrors the production site, and is not protected by authentication, noindex, or a blocking robots.txt.
  • Warn when a staging/test subdomain is publicly accessible but similarity or index protection cannot be confirmed.
  • Pass when no public staging/test subdomain is detected, or detected staging hosts are protected by authentication, non-200 access, noindex, or Disallow: /.
  • Explain the impact as duplicate indexable pages: Google may treat test.example.com and www.example.com as separate but near-identical URLs, splitting ranking signals and competing with the production site.
  • Recommended fixes: add Basic Auth/password protection first; also block crawlers on the staging host with User-agent: * + Disallow: /; add page-level noindex if pages can still be accessed.

Sitemap URL Inventory rules:

  • Place this as the first module in {{site_checks_html}}, before the Crawlability table.
  • Render it as its own table with columns: Directory · URL Count · Page Type · Example Page.
  • Use check-site.py sitemap_inventory output to summarize first-level directories, URL counts, inferred page types, and one representative example URL.
  • Treat this as a site-level map, not a pass/fail single-page SEO audit.
  • Use status info unless sitemap URLs cannot be parsed; do not penalize a site for having many or few URLs in a directory without deeper evidence.
  • Always include a next-step note: the user can continue with deeper full audits by selecting representative sample URLs from major directories such as /blog/, /tools/, /alternatives/, /templates/, or /use-cases/.

Page Speed Checks (in {{pagespeed_checks_html}})

Full-only:

  • Lighthouse category scores: Performance · Accessibility · Best Practices · SEO
  • Lab metrics: FCP · LCP · TBT · CLS · Speed Index
  • Final URL and screenshot availability

E-E-A-T Checks (in {{eeat_checks_html}})

Core checks:

  • About Us · Contact · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Media/Partners (only if present)

Contact logic (Contact row only):

  • A dedicated /contact page is not required
  • Pass if contact is reachable via any of: dedicated contact page (HTTP 200) · About page with contact details · footer/nav mailto, email, social links, or contact form
  • Fail only when no contact pathway exists anywhere on the site
  • Missing /contact alone is not a fail when About or footer/nav already expose contact info

E-E-A-T infrastructure rules — two layers per trust page:

  • Layer 1 — Exists: HTTP 200 for the trust page URL (Contact uses Contact-specific rules above)
  • Layer 2 — Reachable: linked from footer or main nav

| Page | Required | |---|---| | About Us | Yes | | Contact | Yes — dedicated page optional; About or footer/nav contact details satisfy this | | Privacy Policy | Yes | | Terms of Service | Yes | | Media / Partners | No — include only if present |

Status rules (About, Privacy, Terms, Media/Partners):

  • Page missing (non-200) → Fail
  • Page exists but not linked in footer/nav → Warn
  • Page exists and linked in footer/nav → Pass
  • Optional page missing → skip, do not include row

Contact-specific rules:

  1. Try common paths (/contact, /contact-us) — HTTP 200 counts as Exists
  2. If no contact page, check the About page body for email, social, or contact details
  3. Also scan homepage footer and nav for mailto:, visible email, social links, or a contact form
  4. Exists Pass if any contact pathway is found
  5. Exists Fail only when no contact information is found anywhere
  6. Reachable Pass if a contact page link or contact details appear in footer/nav
  7. Reachable Warn if contact is only reachable inside About page content, not directly in footer/nav
  8. Do not recommend creating /contact when About or footer already expose contact info

Page-Level Checks (in {{page_checks_html}}), output in this exact order:

Core checks: URL Slug · Title Tag · Meta Description · H1 Tag · Canonical Tag · Image Alt Text · Word Count · Keyword Placement · Heading Structure · Internal Links · Schema (JSON-LD)

Schema (JSON-LD) rules:

  • Treat Schema as a quality check, not only a presence check.
  • Validate JSON-LD parseability, expected @type, required fields, recommended rich-result fields, nested fields, and primary-type conflicts.
  • Fail when JSON-LD is invalid, the expected schema type is missing, required fields are missing, or localized schema clearly points to the wrong language/URL.
  • Warn when recommended fields are missing, nested fields are incomplete, multilingual pages lack inLanguage, or localized schema cannot be fully confirmed.
  • Pass only when the expected schema type is present, required fields are present, no conflicts are found, and localized schema matches the current page language/URL when applicable.
  • For multilingual pages, each language version should have its own schema with matching inLanguage, language-specific headline/description where present, and url / mainEntityOfPage pointing to the current localized canonical URL.

★ Full-only additions:

  • OG Tags — og:title, og:description, og:image, og:type, og:url presence and validity
  • Twitter Card — twitter:card type, title/description/image (with OG fallback detection)

How to Use Script JSON Output

Same rules across full audit modules — map each field's status directly to the report check table:

  • statuspass / warn / fail / error → badge in report
  • detail → starting point for Evidence line
  • Do not contradict script output unless you have additional observable evidence

For check-site.py output:

  • staging_subdomains.status → Staging Subdomain Indexation row status
  • staging_subdomains.detail → Staging Subdomain Indexation row detail
  • staging_subdomains.public_hosts → evidence for public staging/test hosts
  • staging_subdomains.similar_hosts → fail evidence for production-like staging duplicates
  • robots.status → robots.txt row status
  • sitemap.status → sitemap.xml row status
  • sitemap_inventory.status → Sitemap URL Inventory module status
  • sitemap_inventory.directories[] → table rows with path, url_count, page_type, and example_url
  • sitemap_inventory.detail → short explanatory note below the inventory table

For check-schema.py output:

  • status → Schema (JSON-LD) row status
  • detail → Schema (JSON-LD) row detail
  • parse_errors → fail evidence for malformed JSON-LD
  • schemas[].fields_missing → fail evidence for missing required schema fields
  • schemas[].recommended_missing and schemas[].nested_issues → warning evidence
  • localized_schema.status → language/URL alignment status for multilingual schema
  • localized_schema.issues → evidence for schema language or URL mismatch

For check-social.py output:

  • og.status → OG Tags row status
  • twitter_card.status → Twitter Card row status
  • og.fields.* → individual field details for the detail cell
  • twitter_card.fields.* → individual field details, note fallback fields

For check-pagespeed.py output:

  • status → overall Page Speed status
  • category_status → Lighthouse Scores badge status
  • metric_status → Core Lab Metrics badge status
  • final_url → Final URL line
  • categories.performance.score → Performance score
  • categories.accessibility.score → Accessibility score
  • categories["best-practices"].score → Best Practices score
  • categories.seo.score → SEO score
  • compact_metrics.fcp.display_value → FCP
  • compact_metrics.lcp.display_value → LCP
  • compact_metrics.tbt.display_value → TBT
  • compact_metrics.cls.display_value → CLS
  • compact_metrics.si.display_value → Speed Index
  • screenshot truthy → Screenshot available

Do not use overall status for the Lighthouse Scores badge. Category scores use Lighthouse thresholds: 90–100 pass, 50–89 warn, 0–49 fail. Example: Performance 60, Accessibility 84, Best Practices 100, SEO 100 means category_status is warn. If LCP or Speed Index fails, metric_status and overall status may be fail while the Lighthouse Scores panel remains warn.

Inside {{pagespeed_checks_html}}, include a short Priority Actions list after the score/metric cards. Keep it to 2–4 concise items based on failing or warning PageSpeed fields:

  • LCP slow → optimize hero media, preload critical image, reduce render-blocking CSS
  • Speed Index slow → defer non-critical scripts and reduce above-the-fold JS/CSS
  • TBT high → split long tasks and delay third-party tags
  • Performance score warning/fail → prioritize the biggest Lighthouse opportunities

Always include the official diagnostic link: https://pagespeed.web.dev/


LLM Review Instructions

Core

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.