AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Owasp Security Review

skill-jgamaraalv-ts-dev-kit-owasp-security-review · by jgamaraalv

Review code and architectures against the OWASP Top 10:2025 — the ten most critical web application security risks. Use when: (1) reviewing code for security vulnerabilities, (2) auditing a feature or codebase against OWASP categories, (3) providing remediation guidance for identified vulnerabilities, (4) writing new code and needing secure coding patterns. Triggers: 'review for security', 'OWASP…

No reviews yet
0 installs
18 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-jgamaraalv-ts-dev-kit-owasp-security-review

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Owasp Security Review? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

OWASP Top 10:2025 Security Review

Quick reference

| # | Category | Key risk | Avg incidence | | --- | ------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------- | | A01 | Broken Access Control | Unauthorized data access, privilege escalation, SSRF, CSRF | 3.74% | | A02 | Security Misconfiguration | Default creds, verbose errors, missing hardening, XXE | 3.00% | | A03 | Software Supply Chain Failures | Vulnerable/malicious dependencies, compromised build pipelines | 5.72% | | A04 | Cryptographic Failures | Weak algorithms, hardcoded keys, missing encryption, weak hashing | 3.80% | | A05 | Injection | SQLi, XSS, command injection, LDAP/XPath/EL injection | 3.08% | | A06 | Insecure Design | Missing threat modeling, business logic flaws, insufficient controls | 1.86% | | A07 | Authentication Failures | Credential stuffing, weak passwords, session fixation, missing MFA | 2.92% | | A08 | Software/Data Integrity Failures | Unsigned updates, insecure deserialization, untrusted CDN code | 2.75% | | A09 | Security Logging & Alerting Failures | Missing audit logs, no alerting, log injection, sensitive data in logs | 3.91% | | A10 | Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions | Failing open, info leakage via errors, unchecked return values | 2.95% |

Severity classification

Use these severity levels when reporting findings:

  • Critical: Directly exploitable, leads to full system compromise or mass data breach (e.g., SQLi with no parameterization, hardcoded admin credentials, missing auth on admin endpoints).
  • High: Exploitable with moderate effort, significant data exposure or privilege escalation (e.g., IDOR, weak password hashing, SSRF, deserialization of untrusted data).
  • Medium: Exploitable under specific conditions, limited impact (e.g., missing CSRF protection, verbose error messages, missing security headers).
  • Low: Defense-in-depth issue, minimal direct impact (e.g., missing rate limiting, incomplete logging, suboptimal crypto configuration).

Workflows

Code review for security

Systematically check the code against each relevant category:

  1. Identify the code's surface area — Does it handle auth? User input? File uploads? External data? Crypto? Error responses?
  2. Select relevant categories from the table above based on the surface area.
  3. Load the reference file for each relevant category and check the code against the "What to look for" section.
  4. Report findings grouped by category with severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low), the specific code location, and a concrete fix.

Priority order for review (highest impact first):

  • [CRITICAL] Input handling code → A05 (Injection), A01 (Access Control)
  • [CRITICAL] Auth/session code → A07 (Authentication), A01 (Access Control)
  • [HIGH] Data storage/transmission → A04 (Cryptographic Failures)
  • [HIGH] Configuration/deployment → A02 (Security Misconfiguration)
  • [HIGH] Dependencies → A03 (Supply Chain)
  • [MEDIUM] Error handling → A10 (Exceptional Conditions), A09 (Logging)
  • [MEDIUM] Architecture/design → A06 (Insecure Design)
  • [MEDIUM] Data integrity → A08 (Integrity Failures)

Security audit checklist

Generate a checklist for a feature or codebase:

  1. Read the feature/codebase to understand its scope.
  2. For each of the 10 categories, determine if it applies.
  3. For applicable categories, load the reference file and produce a checklist of items to verify.
  4. Output a markdown checklist grouped by category.

Remediation guidance

When a vulnerability is identified:

  1. Classify it into the correct OWASP category.
  2. Load the corresponding reference file.
  3. Apply the prevention checklist to produce a specific, actionable fix.
  4. Provide a code example of the fix when possible.

Reference files

Load the relevant file when you need detailed guidance for a specific category:

  • A01 Broken Access Control — authorization checks, IDOR, CORS, CSRF, path traversal: [references/a01-broken-access-control.md](references/a01-broken-access-control.md)
  • A02 Security Misconfiguration — hardening, default creds, error messages, headers, XXE: [references/a02-security-misconfiguration.md](references/a02-security-misconfiguration.md)
  • A03 Supply Chain Failures — dependency management, SBOM, build pipeline security: [references/a03-supply-chain-failures.md](references/a03-supply-chain-failures.md)
  • A04 Cryptographic Failures — encryption, hashing, key management, TLS, PRNG: [references/a04-cryptographic-failures.md](references/a04-cryptographic-failures.md)
  • A05 Injection — SQL, XSS, command, ORM, LDAP, template injection: [references/a05-injection.md](references/a05-injection.md)
  • A06 Insecure Design — threat modeling, business logic, secure SDLC: [references/a06-insecure-design.md](references/a06-insecure-design.md)
  • A07 Authentication Failures — credential stuffing, MFA, session management, password policy: [references/a07-authentication-failures.md](references/a07-authentication-failures.md)
  • A08 Integrity Failures — deserialization, code signing, untrusted sources, CDN trust: [references/a08-integrity-failures.md](references/a08-integrity-failures.md)
  • A09 Logging & Alerting — audit trails, log injection, alerting, sensitive data in logs: [references/a09-logging-alerting-failures.md](references/a09-logging-alerting-failures.md)
  • A10 Exceptional Conditions — error handling, fail-closed, resource cleanup, info leakage: [references/a10-exceptional-conditions.md](references/a10-exceptional-conditions.md)

When reporting security findings, use the template in [template.md](template.md) for each finding.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.