Technical Assessment Loop
Use when running checkpoints that compare plan, implementation evidence, risk, metrics, review findings, or readiness before continuing.
Install
$ agentstack add skill-jon-devlapaz-agentic-se-skills-technical-assessment-loop ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Links to your public security report.[](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-jon-devlapaz-agentic-se-skills-technical-assessment-loop) Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Technical Assessment Loop
Use this skill at checkpoints to decide whether evidence supports continuing, changing course, or closing.
Workflow
- Restate objective, current plan, and current system state.
- Inventory evidence: changed files, tests, inspections, review findings, artifacts, user feedback, and unresolved assumptions.
- Compare evidence against requirements, integration state, verification, validation, and risk.
- Identify drift: scope creep, weak evidence, stale assumptions, hidden dependencies, or validation gaps.
- Decide one action: continue, rework, split scope, escalate, pause for input, or close.
- Record the decision, evidence, residual risk, and next checkpoint trigger.
- Do not close work because tests passed if validation or user intent is still unproven.
- Output a checkpoint note: objective, evidence, gaps, risk, decision, next action.
Source grounding
Start with references/source-grounding.md, then inspect Section 6.7 pages extraction/pages/page_165.md through extraction/pages/page_171.md before making technical-assessment claims.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: jon-devlapaz
- Source: jon-devlapaz/agentic-se-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.