Install
$ agentstack add skill-jovd83-restassured-skill-ci ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Rest Assured CI
1. Choose The Pipeline Shape
- Detect the CI system first.
- Run smoke tags before full regression when pipeline time matters.
- Use containers or disposable services for integration tests.
2. Configure Execution
- Use provider guidance from [github-actions.md](references/github-actions.md), [gitlab.md](references/gitlab.md), or [other-ci.md](references/other-ci.md).
- Use [junit5-tagging-and-suites.md](references/junit5-tagging-and-suites.md) for JUnit 5 selection.
- Use [docker-and-containers.md](references/docker-and-containers.md) for containerized execution.
- Use [parallelization.md](references/parallelization.md) for sharding or split-by-tag execution.
- Use [reporting-and-artifacts.md](references/reporting-and-artifacts.md) for JUnit XML and logs.
- Use [quality-gates.md](references/quality-gates.md) when the pipeline must fail on coverage, drift, or weak-assertion thresholds.
- Use
python scripts/evaluate_quality_gates.pywhen the quality-gate evaluation must be deterministic and reusable across CI jobs.
3. Add Quality Gates
- Fail the pipeline on contract-enforcement regressions only when the repo has explicitly opted into strict gates.
- Use the coverage-gap report to enforce
no uncovered operationsorno unreviewed drift-only operationswhen the team wants coverage hardening. - Use the assertion-strength report to enforce thresholds such as
no weak testsormax transport-only tests. - Keep quality gates separate for runtime-aligned suites and contract-enforcement suites when both exist.
- Regenerate the reporting bundle before applying report-based gates.
- Prefer
python scripts/evaluate_quality_gates.py --coverage-gap --assertion-strength --contract-mismatchesinstead of rewriting threshold logic inline in CI YAML.
4. Troubleshooting
- Problem: CI cannot reach the service under test.
Fix: Verify network, startup ordering, and environment variables before changing the tests.
- Problem: Tag-based selection runs zero tests.
Fix: Verify JUnit 5 tag configuration and test task flags.
- Problem: The pipeline fails because report-based gates are stale.
Fix: Regenerate the bundle reports before evaluating gate thresholds.
- Problem: CI duplicates threshold logic in multiple jobs.
Fix: Move the evaluation into scripts/evaluate_quality_gates.py.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: jovd83
- Source: jovd83/restassured-skill
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.