Install
$ agentstack add skill-jskherman-engg-skills-design-of-experiments ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Design of Experiments
Overview
Factorial DOE helpers:
- Full factorial design enumeration for an arbitrary number of factors at
arbitrary level counts.
- Two-level factorial design (2^k) with optional randomization.
- Main-effect estimates from a fitted run (simple averaging contrast).
Suitable for hands-on screening campaigns with a small number of factors; not a replacement for full RSM (central composite, Box-Behnken) or optimal-design software.
Prerequisites
uvavailable.
When to Use
- Planning a 2-5 factor screening campaign with clear inputs and a single
response.
- Generating a randomised run sheet for a small experiment.
- Computing the rough magnitude of main effects after a small run.
Don't use for
- Response-surface methodology (RSM, central composite, Box-Behnken).
- Plackett-Burman or fractional-factorial confounding analysis.
- Observational data — DOE assumes you control the factor levels.
- Mixture experiments (constrained simplex designs).
Utility Scripts
uv run scripts/doe.py full-factorial --factor "T=300,320" --factor "P=1e5,2e5" --output /tmp/fact.jsonuv run scripts/doe.py two-level --factors "A,B,C" --randomize --seed 42 --output /tmp/2k.json
Procedure
- List factors and their levels (2 for screening, more for full
factorial).
- Choose the design (full factorial for small k; two-level if you only
want main effects and 2-factor interactions).
- Randomise the run order to mitigate time-order effects.
- Add replication externally if you need pure-error estimates or curvature checks.
- After the run, compute main effects.
- If main effects are statistically significant, iterate to RSM with a
different tool.
Pitfalls
- Choosing two levels that are too close; main effects fall in the noise.
- Forgetting to randomise; time-order confounds the factor effects.
- Reporting effects without replicate variability.
- Confusing main effect (averaged over the other factors) with
conditional slope (computed at fixed values of the other factors).
- Treating a two-level design as a curvature test; this script does not add
centre points or run an RSM analysis.
- Using a 2^k design when you have only one shot per condition (no
replicates) and treating ±SE as meaningful.
- Picking response that is correlated with multiple physical phenomena
without thinking about what the design is testing.
- Forgetting blocking when the experiment spans multiple days /
raw-material lots.
Fallback Strategies
- If the number of factors exceeds 5, switch to fractional-factorial or
Plackett-Burman screening (use pyDOE2 outside this skill).
- For curvature exploration, switch to a central composite design with a
dedicated package.
Verification
- Run the listed script with representative inputs and an
--outputfile when a deterministic calculation is available. - Confirm the JSON result contains
ok: true, expected units, and no unhandled warnings. - Check result magnitudes against the stated assumptions, references, and a hand calculation or known operating range before reporting them.
References
references/factorial_designs.md— design conventions and analysis
outline.
- Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments (any edition).
Anti-Patterns
- Reporting "the effect of T is X" without naming the level range and
the other factors held fixed.
- Designing an experiment without randomization and reporting the
estimates as if independent.
- Using 2-level factorial for a known curved response.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: jskherman
- Source: jskherman/engg-skills
- License: Apache-2.0
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.