Install
$ agentstack add skill-julianoczkowski-product-manager-pm-competitive-landscape ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
About
Competitive Landscape (Framework: Market → Competitive Landscape)
Identify competitive and alternative offerings in the market, assess their strengths and weaknesses, and develop a strategy for winning. Frame the comparison universe correctly — customers don't just choose between named competitors; "do nothing", spreadsheets, and in-house builds are alternatives too. Analytical rule of thumb: know when to fight and when to run. See ../pm-copilot/references/framework.md.
The Solution Matrix
Plot your products and competitors' products on a 2×2:
- X-axis — Impact to Customer: Low → High
- Y-axis — Depth of Investment: Low → High
| Quadrant | Investment / Impact | Meaning | | :-- | :-- | :-- | | Utilities | Low investment / Low impact | Keep the lights on; don't over-invest. | | No Brainer | Low investment / High impact | Do these — best return. | | Strategic Vision | High investment / High impact | Big bets that need a business case. | | "Why?" | High investment / Low impact | Avoid — cost without customer value. |
Use the Solution Matrix to: assess incremental technology investment vs. relative market value with development; frame how the product improves operations when interviewing the market; position against the competition; price products; position a product portfolio; and determine sales-channel strategy.
Interview the user (batch questions)
- What problem/segment are we competing in, and which personas decide?
- Who are the direct competitors — and what are the alternatives (do nothing, in-house, adjacent tools)?
- For each: strengths, weaknesses, pricing power, brand equity, and where they beat us?
- Where do our offerings and theirs sit on customer impact vs. depth of investment?
Artifact templates
Competitive Landscape analysis
# Competitive Landscape —
**Company:** · **Feature / Product:**
**Author:** · **Date created:** · **Version:** 1.0
**The comparison universe:**
| Competitor / Alternative | Strengths | Weaknesses | Our winning strategy (fight or run) |
| :-- | :-- | :-- | :-- |
| | | | |
## Where we win
## Where we should not fight
## Evidence
Solution Matrix
# Solution Matrix —
Axes: X = Impact to Customer (Low→High), Y = Depth of Investment (Low→High).
| | Low Impact | High Impact |
| :-- | :-- | :-- |
| **High Investment** | "Why?" — | Strategic Vision — |
| **Low Investment** | Utilities — | No Brainer — |
**Our products:**
**Competitors' products:**
**Read-out:**
Deliver the artifact
Follow ../pm-copilot/references/artifact-output.md: ask Markdown or .docx, write the .md, convert to .docx on request via your environment's native document-creation capability. Then offer the next stage: sharpen pm-positioning against these competitors, or set investment direction in pm-product-strategy.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: julianoczkowski
- Source: julianoczkowski/product-manager
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.