AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Code Review

skill-karmaloopai-jiva-code-review · by KarmaloopAI

>

No reviews yet
0 installs
40 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-karmaloopai-jiva-code-review

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-karmaloopai-jiva-code-review)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Code Review? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Code Review Skill

Overview

Perform comprehensive code reviews analyzing bugs, style issues, performance bottlenecks, security vulnerabilities, and adherence to best practices.

Workflow

1. Scan Code Structure

  • Use view tool to read all relevant files in the codebase
  • Identify file types, frameworks, and languages used
  • Map dependencies and module relationships

2. Analyze Code Quality

Check for the following categories:

Bugs & Logic Errors:

  • Null/undefined handling
  • Off-by-one errors
  • Race conditions
  • Memory leaks
  • Incorrect algorithm implementation

Security Issues:

  • SQL injection vulnerabilities
  • XSS vulnerabilities
  • Authentication/authorization flaws
  • Sensitive data exposure
  • Unsafe dependencies

Performance Problems:

  • Inefficient algorithms (O(n²) where O(n) possible)
  • Unnecessary database queries
  • Memory overuse
  • Blocking operations
  • Missing caching

Code Style:

  • Naming conventions
  • Code formatting inconsistencies
  • Magic numbers/strings
  • Dead code
  • Overly complex functions

Best Practices:

  • DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) violations
  • SOLID principles adherence
  • Error handling patterns
  • Testing coverage
  • Documentation quality

3. Categorize Findings

Group issues by:

  • Critical: Security vulnerabilities, data loss risks
  • High: Bugs that cause crashes/errors
  • Medium: Performance issues, maintainability problems
  • Low: Style issues, minor improvements

4. Provide Solutions

For each issue:

  • Explain WHY it's a problem
  • Show the problematic code snippet
  • Provide a SPECIFIC fix with code examples
  • Explain the benefits of the fix

5. Generate Report

Structure the output as:

# Code Review Report

## Summary
- Total files reviewed: X
- Issues found: Y (Z critical, W high, V medium, U low)

## Critical Issues
[List critical issues with fixes]

## High Priority Issues
[List high priority issues with fixes]

## Medium Priority Issues
[List medium priority issues with fixes]

## Low Priority Issues
[List low priority issues with fixes]

## Strengths
[Mention good practices found in the code]

## Recommendations
[Overall suggestions for improvement]

Resources

When to Use References

  • Read references/security_checklist.md when analyzing security
  • Consult references/performance_patterns.md for performance optimization
  • Check references/language_guides/ for language-specific best practices

Scripts (Future Enhancement)

  • scripts/run_linter.sh - Run automated linting
  • scripts/complexity_analysis.py - Calculate cyclomatic complexity
  • scripts/security_scan.py - Run security vulnerability scanner

Example Usage

User: "Review this authentication code"

Process:

  1. Read authentication-related files with view tool
  2. Check for common auth vulnerabilities (password storage, session management, etc.)
  3. Analyze token handling and encryption
  4. Check for privilege escalation risks
  5. Provide detailed report with fixes

Tips for Effective Reviews

  1. Be Specific: Don't just say "improve error handling" - show exactly how
  2. Prioritize: Focus on critical/high issues first
  3. Be Constructive: Acknowledge good code practices too
  4. Provide Context: Explain the "why" behind each suggestion
  5. Code Examples: Always show concrete before/after code
  6. Consider Trade-offs: Mention any downsides to suggested changes

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.