AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Gtm Pipeline:company Enrichment

skill-keinsaasforever-gtm-pipeline-skills-gtm-company-enrichment · by keinsaasforever

Enrich a company list with structured data and score against ICP. Phase 1: data enrichment (PhantomBuster SN, Parallel Task Group, SimilarWeb, Firecrawl, SerpAPI). Phase 2: ICP scoring via LLM (icp_score 0-100, optional gate ≥70). Use after company-search and before signal-search. Also triggers on "enrich companies", "ICP scoring", "score companies".

No reviews yet
0 installs
10 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-keinsaasforever-gtm-pipeline-skills-gtm-company-enrichment

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-keinsaasforever-gtm-pipeline-skills-gtm-company-enrichment)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Gtm Pipeline:company Enrichment? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Company Enrichment

Enrich a company list with structured data and score against ICP. Returns enriched CSV + ICP scores.

Read ~/.claude/skills/gtm-pipeline/_shared/conventions.md before executing.


When to Use

  • After company-search — raw list needs domains, revenue, headcount, etc.
  • Before signal-search — ICP scoring determines which companies to invest signal credits on
  • Before people-search — enriched domains required for most people search providers

Inputs

| Input | Required | Source | |-------|----------|--------| | Company CSV | Yes | Company Search output or user-provided | | ICP definition | Yes | context/icp.md or user prompt |


Two Phases

Phase 1: Data Enrichment

Add structured company data. Choose provider based on what's available:

| Provider | Data Points | Input needed | Cost | Notes | |----------|-------------|--------------|------|-------| | PB SN Scraper | Full SN profile: headcount by dept, growth metrics, revenue range, industry, location | SN company URL | Free (SN account) | Most comprehensive | | Parallel Task Group | Custom fields via web research | Company name + domain | ~$0.025–0.05/row | Flexible output schema. Ask which processor | | SimilarWeb via Apify | Monthly traffic, traffic sources | Domain | Apify credits | Actor: curious_coder/similarweb-scraper | | Firecrawl | Website content, tech stack signals | Domain | Firecrawl credits | Scrape + extract | | SerpAPI | Domain from company name | Company name | SerpAPI credits | Google search → extract domain | | Pipe0 company data | TBD — not yet tested | Domain | TBD | Check pipe0 catalog |

Ask the user which provider to use. Default: PB SN Scraper if SN URLs available, otherwise Parallel Task Group.

Phase 2: ICP Scoring

Score enriched companies against client ICP definition.


Phase 1 Execution

PhantomBuster SN Account Scraper

Agent: Sales Navigator Account Scraper (config key: PB_AGENT_SN_ACCOUNT in _shared/local.md, or look up via PhantomBuster MCP)

Read _shared/phantombuster.md for the full API pattern. Use the /phantombuster skill to generate the script:

/phantombuster "Sales Navigator Account Scraper" -- scrape SN company data from , column 

Input: SN company URLs (one per row in CSV) Output per company: name, industry, headcount by dept, location, LinkedIn URL, SN URL, revenue range, growth metrics (6m / 1y / 2y), median tenure

Parallel Task Group (Custom Enrichment)

Endpoint: POST https://api.parallel.ai/v1/tasks Auth: x-api-key: $PARALLEL_API_KEY

Always ask which processor to use: core, core2x, pro, ultra

Design an output schema matching the data points needed for ICP scoring. Example:

{
  "company_website": {"type": "string"},
  "linkedin_company_url": {"type": "string"},
  "estimated_revenue": {"type": "string"},
  "employee_count": {"type": "integer"},
  "industry": {"type": "string"},
  "founded_year": {"type": "integer"},
  "tech_stack_indicators": {"type": "array", "items": {"type": "string"}}
}

Always include company_website and linkedin_company_url in the schema.

Check latest docs via context7 (libraryName: parallel-web).

SimilarWeb via Apify

Actor: curious_coder/similarweb-scraper Env var: APIFY_API_KEY

Input: list of domains Output: monthly visits, traffic sources, bounce rate, pages per visit

Output

Write to csv/intermediate/companies_enriched.csv. Preserve all original columns, add enrichment columns.


Phase 2: ICP Scoring

How It Works

  1. Read company rows (status=new, or all unscored)
  2. Load ICP definition from context/icp.md
  3. LLM scores each company → icp_score (0–100) + icp_rationale
  4. Write score back to CSV
  5. Process in batches (~10–20 companies per loop)

LLM: Ask the user which model to use (any LLM with structured output / JSON mode works).

Input Fields Used for Scoring

From the enriched company data:

  • name, industry, description, employee count, location, website, LinkedIn URL
  • Revenue (min/max), department headcounts (engineering, sales, ops, IT, BD, marketing)
  • Growth metrics (6m, 1y, 2y), median tenure, year founded

ICP Scoring Prompt

The LLM receives each company row + the ICP definition and returns a structured score.

Output schema per company:

{
  "icp_score": 85,
  "icp_rationale": "DACH-based B2B SaaS company in target revenue range. Experiencing rapid growth with lean tech team, indicating clear need for external automation support rather than in-house development."
}

Per-Client Customization

  • ICP doc: Maintain context/icp.md with the client's ICP definition — industry, size, location, revenue, tech profile, exclusions
  • Score threshold: Adjust the gate based on selectivity (default: ≥70). The gate is optional — useful for credit savings on downstream steps, not a hard requirement.

Optional Gate for Next Step (Signal Search)

To save credits on downstream signal-search, gate by:

  • icp_score >= 70
  • website not empty
  • type in [Startup, Scaleup] (if type field available)

Skip the gate if you want to score signals on the full enriched set.

Output

Write to csv/intermediate/companies_scored.csv with added columns:

icp_score, icp_rationale, scoring_status

All original + enrichment columns preserved.


Full Output

Updated CSV with all columns:

company_name, company_domain, company_linkedin_url,
company_industry, company_hq_location, company_hq_country,
company_employee_count, company_employee_range,
revenue_range, growth_6m, growth_1y, growth_2y,
headcount_engineering, headcount_sales, headcount_operations, headcount_IT,
icp_score, icp_rationale, enrichment_source

What's Missing (To Document)

  • Pipe0 company data pipe: test and document endpoint
  • Parallel Task Group for company enrichment: test with specific output schema
  • SimilarWeb via Apify: document the full actor setup and output field mapping
  • LLM API integration patterns for standalone ICP scoring (outside orchestration platforms)

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.