AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Project Coordination

skill-kelegele-oh-my-pm-project-coordination · by kelegele

协调项目执行、跟踪进度并管理风险。当用户需要管理项目、跟踪进度、协调团队间工作,或说"项目状态"、"跟踪这个项目"、"进度如何"时使用。即使没有明确说"项目协调",当用户正在管理执行、依赖关系或跨团队工作时也应激活。

No reviews yet
0 installs
6 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-kelegele-oh-my-pm-project-coordination

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Project Coordination? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Project Coordination

Keep projects on track and teams aligned.

What This Skill Does

Coordinates project execution by tracking progress, managing dependencies, identifying risks, and facilitating communication between teams. Ensures the project moves from requirements to release smoothly.

When to Use

Activate this skill when:

  • User needs to track project progress or status
  • Phrases like "project status", "track this", "what's the progress"
  • Coordinating work across multiple teams
  • Managing project risks and blockers
  • User says "are we on track" or "project update"

How It Works

The coordination process ensures smooth project execution:

  1. Establish baseline - Define scope, timeline, resources
  2. Track progress - Monitor completion against plan
  3. Identify blockers - Find risks and dependencies
  4. Facilitate resolution - Help teams overcome obstacles
  5. Communicate status - Keep stakeholders informed
  6. Adapt as needed - Adjust plans based on reality

Input Parameters

| Parameter | Type | Required | Description | |:---|:---|:---|:---| | project_name | string | Yes | Name of the project | | timeline | object | No | Planned start/end dates, milestones | | teams | list | No | Teams and people involved |

Output Structure

The skill generates coordination outputs:

  1. Project plan - Structured plan with tasks and owners
  2. Status reports - Regular progress updates
  3. Risk register - Identified risks and mitigations
  4. Blocker list - Current blockers and owners

Project Plan Format

# Project Plan: [Project Name]

## Overview
- **Start Date**: [Date]
- **Target Release**: [Date]
- **Project Manager**: [Name]
- **Status**: On Track / At Risk / Off Track

## Teams & Responsibilities
| Team | Lead | Scope | Capacity |
|:-----|:-----|:------|:---------|
| Engineering | [Name] | Backend, frontend | 40 hrs/week |
| Design | [Name] | UI, UX | 20 hrs/week |
| QA | [Name] | Testing, automation | 20 hrs/week |

## Timeline

Week 1 |████████| Design complete Week 2 | ████████| Backend API Week 3 | ████████| Frontend implementation Week 4 | ████| QA & bug fixes Week 5 | ████| Release prep


## Work Breakdown

### Phase 1: Design (Week 1)
| Task | Owner | Estimate | Status | Dependencies |
|:-----|:------|:---------|:--------|:-------------|
| Wireframes | Designer | 2d | ✅ Done | - |
| Mockups | Designer | 2d | 🔄 In Progress | Wireframes |
| Design review | PM | 0.5d | ⏳ Pending | Mockups |

### Phase 2: Backend (Week 2)
| Task | Owner | Estimate | Status | Dependencies |
|:-----|:------|:---------|:--------|:-------------|
| API design | Backend Lead | 1d | ⏳ Pending | Design review |
| Implementation | Backend Dev | 3d | ⏳ Pending | API design |
| API testing | QA | 1d | ⏳ Pending | Implementation |

### Phase 3: Frontend (Week 3)
| Task | Owner | Estimate | Status | Dependencies |
|:-----|:------|:---------|:--------|:-------------|
| Component setup | Frontend Dev | 1d | ⏳ Pending | Design review |
| Implementation | Frontend Dev | 3d | ⏳ Pending | Component setup, API |
| Integration | Frontend Dev | 1d | ⏳ Pending | Implementation |

## Dependencies
| Task | Depends On | Risk Level |
|:-----|:-----------|:-----------|
| Frontend implementation | Backend API | Medium |
| QA testing | Frontend + Backend | Low |

## Milestones
| Milestone | Date | Criteria | Status |
|:----------|:-----|:---------|:--------|
| Design complete | Week 1 | All mockups approved | ✅ |
| API complete | Week 2 | All endpoints tested | 🔄 |
| Feature complete | Week 3 | All tickets done | ⏳ |
| Ready for release | Week 4 | QA signed off | ⏳ |

Status Report Format

# Project Status: [Project Name]
**Week of**: [Date]
**Reporting Period**: [Start] - [End]

## Summary
| Metric | Status |
|:-------|:--------|
| Overall | 🟢 On Track / 🟡 At Risk / 🔴 Off Track |
| Timeline | On schedule / 1 week behind / 2+ weeks behind |
| Budget | Under / On track / Over |
| Scope | Stable / Minor changes / Major changes |

## This Week's Progress
**Completed**:
- ✅ [Completed item 1]
- ✅ [Completed item 2]

**In Progress**:
- 🔄 [In progress item 1] (60%)
- 🔄 [In progress item 2] (30%)

## Blocked / At Risk
| Item | Impact | Owner | Action |
|:-----|:-------|:-------|:-------|
| [Blocker] | High/Medium/Low | [Who] | [What's being done] |

## Upcoming Week
**Planned**:
- ⏳ [Planned item 1]
- ⏳ [Planned item 2]

## Risks & Issues
| Risk | Level | Mitigation | Status |
|:-----|:------|:-----------|:--------|
| [Risk] | High/Medium/Low | [Mitigation plan] | Open/Mitigated |

## Decisions Made This Week
1. [Decision 1] - [Rationale]
2. [Decision 2] - [Rationale]

## Stakeholder Communications
- [ ] Update sent to stakeholders
- [ ] Leadership notified of risks
- [ ] Team briefed on changes

Risk Register Format

# Risk Register: [Project Name]

| ID | Risk | Probability | Impact | Score | Mitigation | Owner | Status |
|:---|:-----|:------------|:-------|:-----|:-----------|:------|:--------|
| R1 | API dependency delayed | Medium | High | 12 | Parallel work possible | Tech Lead | Open |
| R2 | Designer unavailable | Low | Medium | 6 | Contract backup | PM | Mitigated |
| R3 | Scope creep | High | High | 16 | Strict change process | PM | Open |

**Risk Score** = Probability (1-5) × Impact (1-5)
- **1-5**: Low risk (monitor)
- **6-10**: Medium risk (plan mitigation)
- **11-25**: High risk (active management)

Quality Standards

Before delivering, ensure:

  • Project plan has clear tasks and owners
  • Status is accurate and up-to-date
  • Blockers are identified with owners
  • Risks have mitigation plans
  • Stakeholders are informed appropriately
  • Dependencies are tracked

Context Integration

Reads:

  • docs/product/review-notes/*.md - Requirement review decisions
  • docs/product/design/*.md - Design specifications

Writes:

  • docs/product/project-plan.md - Project plan and tracking
  • docs/product/status-reports/ - Weekly status reports

Read By:

  • release-management - Uses status for release planning

Example Usage

User: "Create a project plan for the onboarding feature"
→ Generates structured project plan with tasks and timeline

User: "What's the status of the checkout project?"
→ Pulls current status and generates report

User: "We're blocked on the API integration"
→ Updates blocker list and suggests mitigation options

Best Practices

  1. Be visible - Make status accessible to all stakeholders
  2. Focus on blockers - Prioritize removing obstacles
  3. Communicate early - Bad news should travel fast
  4. Update regularly - Stale information is worse than none
  5. Celebrate wins - Acknowledge progress and achievements

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.