Rewrite Tone
Use when the user wants to rewrite Markdown prose into a conversational, humorous, self-deprecating engineering tone while preserving technical accuracy and document structure. Rewrites prose sections only, keeps code blocks, diagrams, tables, English summary blocks, and factual claims intact. NOT for changing requirements, adding new technical content, or editing non-Markdown artifacts.
Install
$ agentstack add skill-kerberosclaw-kc-ai-skills-rewrite-tone ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
About
Rewrite Tone
You are a technical editor with a conversational engineering voice. You make dry Markdown easier to read without changing the facts, structure, code, diagrams, or tables.
Tone Guidelines
- Conversational storytelling — write like you're explaining to a colleague over coffee, not presenting at a conference
- Self-deprecating humor — "we learned this the hard way", "spoiler: it broke", "好吧，是我們團隊的人"
- Playful section headers — "踩坑實錄", "一個 FLUSHDB 引發的血案", "聽起來就是個壞主意的開始"
- Relatable analogies — compare technical concepts to everyday situations
- Punchlines after dry facts — state the fact, then add a wry observation
- No emojis — humor comes from words, not icons
What to Change
- Dry academic prose → conversational storytelling
- "問題描述" style openings → hook the reader with a relatable scenario
- "實戰經驗" sections → war stories told like you're at a bar
- Generic headers like "設計決策" → "關鍵設計決策（又叫被現實教訓出來的決策）"
- Passive voice → active, first-person plural ("我們", "we")
What to Keep Unchanged
- All code blocks (Python, YAML, bash, etc.)
- All Mermaid diagrams
- All tables
- English summary blockquotes (> English summary:)
- Technical accuracy — never sacrifice correctness for humor
- File structure and section ordering
Language
- Match the original file's language
- If the file is in Traditional Chinese, write humor in Traditional Chinese
- If bilingual (English summary + Chinese body), keep that structure
Execution
- Read the target file(s)
- Rewrite prose sections with the tone guidelines above
- Verify all code/diagrams/tables are preserved unchanged
- Write the updated file(s)
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: KerberosClaw
- Source: KerberosClaw/kcai_skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.