AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Dotnet Testing Complex Object Comparison

skill-kevintsengtw-dotnet-testing-agent-skills-dotnet-testing-complex-object-comparison · by kevintsengtw

|

No reviews yet
0 installs
32 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-kevintsengtw-dotnet-testing-agent-skills-dotnet-testing-complex-object-comparison

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-kevintsengtw-dotnet-testing-agent-skills-dotnet-testing-complex-object-comparison)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
5mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Dotnet Testing Complex Object Comparison? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

複雜物件比對指南(Complex Object Comparison)

核心使用場景

1. 深層物件結構比對 (Object Graph Comparison)

當需要比對包含多層巢狀屬性的複雜物件時:

[Fact]
public void ComplexObject_深層結構比對_應完全相符()
{
    var expected = new Order
    {
        Id = 1,
        Customer = new Customer
        {
            Name = "John Doe",
            Address = new Address
            {
                Street = "123 Main St",
                City = "Seattle",
                ZipCode = "98101"
            }
        },
        Items = new[]
        {
            new OrderItem { ProductName = "Laptop", Quantity = 1, Price = 999.99m },
            new OrderItem { ProductName = "Mouse", Quantity = 2, Price = 29.99m }
        }
    };

    var actual = orderService.GetOrder(1);

    // 深層物件比對
    actual.Should().BeEquivalentTo(expected);
}

2. 循環參照處理 (Circular Reference Handling)

處理物件之間存在循環參照的情況:

[Fact]
public void TreeStructure_循環參照_應正確處理()
{
    // 建立具有父子雙向參照的樹狀結構
    var parent = new TreeNode { Value = "Root" };
    var child1 = new TreeNode { Value = "Child1", Parent = parent };
    var child2 = new TreeNode { Value = "Child2", Parent = parent };
    parent.Children = new[] { child1, child2 };

    var actualTree = treeService.GetTree("Root");

    // 處理循環參照
    actualTree.Should().BeEquivalentTo(parent, options =>
        options.IgnoringCyclicReferences()
               .WithMaxRecursionDepth(10)
    );
}

3-6. 進階比對模式

AwesomeAssertions 還提供多種進階比對模式:動態欄位排除(排除時間戳記、自動生成欄位)、巢狀物件欄位排除、大量資料效能最佳化比對(選擇性屬性比對、抽樣驗證策略)、以及嚴格/寬鬆排序控制。

> 完整程式碼範例請參閱 [references/detailed-comparison-patterns.md](references/detailed-comparison-patterns.md)

比對選項速查表

| 選項方法 | 用途 | 適用場景 | | ---------------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------- | | Excluding(x => x.Property) | 排除特定屬性 | 排除時間戳記、自動生成欄位 | | Including(x => x.Property) | 只包含特定屬性 | 關鍵屬性驗證 | | IgnoringCyclicReferences() | 忽略循環參照 | 樹狀結構、雙向關聯 | | WithMaxRecursionDepth(n) | 限制遞迴深度 | 深層巢狀結構 | | WithStrictOrdering() | 嚴格順序比對 | 陣列/集合順序重要時 | | WithoutStrictOrdering() | 寬鬆順序比對 | 陣列/集合順序不重要時 | | WithTracing() | 啟用追蹤 | 除錯複雜比對失敗 |

常見比對模式與解決方案

模式 1:Entity Framework 實體比對

[Fact]
public void EFEntity_資料庫實體_應排除導航屬性()
{
    var expected = new Product { Id = 1, Name = "Laptop", Price = 999 };
    var actual = dbContext.Products.Find(1);

    actual.Should().BeEquivalentTo(expected, options =>
        options.ExcludingMissingMembers()  // 排除 EF 追蹤屬性
               .Excluding(p => p.CreatedAt)
               .Excluding(p => p.UpdatedAt)
    );
}

模式 2:API Response 比對

[Fact]
public void ApiResponse_JSON反序列化_應忽略額外欄位()
{
    var expected = new UserDto 
    { 
        Id = 1, 
        Username = "john_doe" 
    };

    var response = await httpClient.GetAsync("/api/users/1");
    var actual = await response.Content.ReadFromJsonAsync();

    actual.Should().BeEquivalentTo(expected, options =>
        options.ExcludingMissingMembers()  // 忽略 API 額外欄位
    );
}

模式 3:測試資料建構器比對

[Fact]
public void Builder_測試資料_應匹配預期結構()
{
    var expected = new OrderBuilder()
        .WithId(1)
        .WithCustomer("John Doe")
        .WithItems(3)
        .Build();

    var actual = orderService.CreateOrder(orderRequest);

    actual.Should().BeEquivalentTo(expected, options =>
        options.Excluding(o => o.OrderNumber)  // 系統生成
               .Excluding(o => o.CreatedAt)
    );
}

錯誤訊息最佳化

提供有意義的錯誤訊息

[Fact]
public void Comparison_錯誤訊息_應清楚說明差異()
{
    var expected = new User { Name = "John", Age = 30 };
    var actual = userService.GetUser(1);

    // 使用 because 參數提供上下文
    actual.Should().BeEquivalentTo(expected, options =>
        options.Excluding(u => u.Id)
               .Because("ID 是系統自動生成的,不應納入比對")
    );
}

使用 AssertionScope 進行批次驗證

[Fact]
public void MultipleComparisons_批次驗證_應一次顯示所有失敗()
{
    var users = userService.GetAllUsers();

    using (new AssertionScope())
    {
        foreach (var user in users)
        {
            user.Id.Should().BeGreaterThan(0);
            user.Name.Should().NotBeNullOrEmpty();
            user.Email.Should().MatchRegex(@"^[\w-\.]+@([\w-]+\.)+[\w-]{2,4}$");
        }
    }
    // 所有失敗會一起報告,而非遇到第一個失敗就停止
}

與其他技能整合

此技能可與以下技能組合使用:

  • awesome-assertions-guide: 基礎斷言語法與常用 API
  • autofixture-data-generation: 自動生成測試資料
  • test-data-builder-pattern: 建構複雜測試物件
  • unit-test-fundamentals: 單元測試基礎與 3A 模式

最佳實踐建議

推薦做法

  1. 優先使用屬性排除而非包含:除非只需驗證少數屬性,否則使用 Excluding 更清楚
  2. 建立可重用的排除擴充方法:避免在每個測試重複排除邏輯
  3. 為大量資料比對設定合理策略:平衡效能與驗證完整性
  4. 使用 AssertionScope 進行批次驗證:一次看到所有失敗原因
  5. 提供有意義的 because 說明:幫助未來維護者理解測試意圖

避免做法

  1. 避免過度依賴完整物件比對:考慮只驗證關鍵屬性
  2. 避免忽略循環參照問題:使用 IgnoringCyclicReferences() 明確處理
  3. 避免在每個測試重複排除邏輯:提取為擴充方法
  4. 避免對大量資料做完整深度比對:使用抽樣或關鍵屬性驗證

疑難排解

Q1: BeEquivalentTo 效能很慢怎麼辦?

A: 使用以下策略優化:

  • 使用 Including 只比對關鍵屬性
  • 對大量資料採用抽樣驗證
  • 使用 WithMaxRecursionDepth 限制遞迴深度
  • 考慮使用 AssertKeyPropertiesOnly 快速比對關鍵欄位

Q2: 如何處理 StackOverflowException?

A: 通常由循環參照引起:

options.IgnoringCyclicReferences()
       .WithMaxRecursionDepth(10)

Q3: 如何排除所有時間相關欄位?

A: 使用路徑模式匹配:

options.Excluding(ctx => ctx.Path.EndsWith("At"))
       .Excluding(ctx => ctx.Path.EndsWith("Time"))
       .Excluding(ctx => ctx.Path.Contains("Timestamp"))

Q4: 比對失敗但看不出差異?

A: 啟用詳細追蹤:

options.WithTracing()  // 產生詳細的比對追蹤資訊

範本檔案參考

本技能提供以下範本檔案:

  • templates/comparison-patterns.cs: 常見比對模式範例
  • templates/exclusion-strategies.cs: 欄位排除策略與擴充方法

輸出格式

  • 產生使用 BeEquivalentTo 的深層物件比對斷言
  • 包含 Excluding/Including 屬性過濾設定
  • 務必提及循環參照處理:即使使用者未明確問到,也應說明 IgnoringCyclicReferences()WithMaxRecursionDepth(n) 的用法,因為深層巢狀物件經常會遇到循環參照問題
  • 包含 DTO/Entity 比對的完整測試程式碼

參考資源

原始文章

本技能內容提煉自「老派軟體工程師的測試修練 - 30 天挑戰」系列文章:

  • Day 05 - AwesomeAssertions 進階技巧與複雜情境應用
  • 鐵人賽文章:https://ithelp.ithome.com.tw/articles/10374425
  • 範例程式碼:https://github.com/kevintsengtw/30DaysinTesting_Samples/tree/main/day05

官方文件

相關技能

  • awesome-assertions-guide - AwesomeAssertions 基礎與進階用法
  • unit-test-fundamentals - 單元測試基礎

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.