AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Cognitive Ux Product Marketing

skill-kfeng209-oss-cognitive-ux-cognitive-ux-product-marketing · by kfeng209-oss

Design and audit product-marketing websites for complex software, services, and subscriptions using evidence-informed UX. Use when a visitor must evaluate capabilities, fit, plans, proof, and a demo or trial; return audience paths, capability-to-outcome mapping, transparent comparison, accessibility requirements, and validation metrics.

No reviews yet
0 installs
2 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-kfeng209-oss-cognitive-ux-cognitive-ux-product-marketing

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Cognitive Ux Product Marketing? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Cognitive UX: Product Marketing

Scope

Use for multi-page product marketing and plan evaluation. Use cognitive-ux-sales for one focused campaign; use cognitive-ux-commerce when the visitor purchases inventory.

Intake

  • Identify distinct audiences and their decision criteria.
  • Identify capabilities, differentiators, limits, pricing, and eligibility.
  • Identify trial/demo path, commitment details, and existing proof.

State assumptions that could change the design. Define the primary user task, its consequence of failure, and a measurable success outcome before proposing a layout.

Design procedure

  1. Define audience paths from their job-to-be-done rather than an internal feature taxonomy.
  2. Translate capabilities into observable outcomes, then link each claim to evidence or a clear limitation.
  3. Make plan comparison criteria, usage limits, price basis, renewal, and qualification discoverable before the CTA.
  4. Keep navigation predictable across features, use cases, pricing, security, and support; preserve orientation when visitors compare paths.
  5. Design the demo/trial handoff to explain what data is requested, what happens next, and how to exit.

Label each non-obvious recommendation as Standard / requirement, Evidence-informed default, or Hypothesis to test. Read [archetype evidence](references/archetype-evidence.md) before making research claims.

Required outputs

  • audience-path map
  • capability-to-outcome and proof ledger
  • plan comparison model
  • demo/trial handoff specification
  • task-based evaluation plan
  • Evidence-to-decision table: decision → mechanism → source → label → limitation → test metric.
  • Accessibility, ethics, and recovery-path checklist.

Guardrails

Do not bury pricing or material limits, present marketing claims as research, or use pressure to substitute for decision support.

Related skills

Use cognitive-ux-sales, cognitive-ux-docs, and cognitive-ux-onboarding. Do not combine multiple archetypes by default; select the primary user task and add another skill only when a secondary task is independently important.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.