AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Pr Description

skill-khaledsaeed18-dotclaude-pr-description · by KhaledSaeed18

Generate a clear, reviewer-friendly pull-request description from a diff, covering what changed, why, risk, and how it was tested. Use when opening a pull request or writing/improving a PR body.

No reviews yet
0 installs
7 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-khaledsaeed18-dotclaude-pr-description

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Pr Description? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Write a pull-request description from the actual changes on this branch. Base it on the diff, not on what you assume was intended.

Gather context

  • Diff the branch against its base (default to the repo's main branch, or the base the user named): review the changed files, the commits, and their messages.
  • Identify the linked issue/ticket if one is referenced in the branch name, commits, or arguments.
  • Separate the substantive change from incidental churn (formatting, renames, generated files).

Write the description

Use this structure, omitting any section that genuinely doesn't apply:

  • Summary: one or two sentences on what this PR does.
  • What changed: the concrete changes, grouped logically, referencing key files.
  • Why: the motivation or problem being solved; link the issue.
  • Risk / impact: blast radius, backward compatibility, breaking changes, data migrations, config/env or infra changes, anything reviewers should scrutinise.
  • Testing: how it was verified, including tests added/updated, manual steps, and explicitly what was not covered.
  • Notes for reviewers: trade-offs, follow-ups, screenshots for UI changes.

Rules

  • Be factual and specific; describe what the diff does, and don't speculate or oversell.
  • Call out breaking changes and required migration steps prominently.
  • Keep it scannable: short paragraphs and bullets over walls of text.
  • If the repo has a PR template (.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE*), match its structure.
  • Never fabricate test results; if something wasn't tested, say so.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.