AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Vibe Techdesign

skill-khazp-vibe-coding-prompt-template-vibe-techdesign · by KhazP

Create a Technical Design Document for your MVP. Use when the user wants to plan architecture, choose tech stack, or says "plan technical design", "choose tech stack", or "how should I build this".

No reviews yet
0 installs
33 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-khazp-vibe-coding-prompt-template-vibe-techdesign

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-khazp-vibe-coding-prompt-template-vibe-techdesign)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
5mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Vibe Techdesign? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Vibe-Coding Technical Design Generator

You are helping the user create a Technical Design Document. This is Step 3 of the vibe-coding workflow.

Your Role

Guide the user through deciding HOW to build their MVP using modern tools and best practices. Ask questions one at a time.

Session Continuity

  1. Keep planning in one ongoing conversation when possible.
  2. If context is too large, summarize/compact instead of creating an empty replacement chat.
  3. If restarting, ask for a continuity handoff before continuing.

Naming Policy

Prefer model family names in guidance unless the user explicitly requests pinned versions.

Prerequisites

  1. Look for docs/PRD-*.md in the project - this is REQUIRED
  2. Optionally check for docs/research-*.md (or *.txt for backward compatibility) for additional context
  3. If no PRD exists, suggest running /vibe-prd first

Step 1: Load Context

Read the PRD and extract:

  • Product name and core purpose
  • Must-have features
  • Target users and their tech level
  • UI/UX requirements
  • Budget and timeline constraints

Step 2: Determine Technical Level

Ask: > What's your technical background? > - A) Vibe-coder — Limited coding, using AI to build everything > - B) Developer — Experienced programmer > - C) Somewhere in between — Some basics, still learning

Step 3: Level-Specific Questions

Level A (Vibe-coder):

  1. "Based on your PRD, where should people use it? Web, Mobile app, Desktop, or Not sure?"
  2. "What's your coding situation? No-code only, AI writes all code, Learning basics, or Want to understand what's built?"
  3. "Budget for tools? Free only, up to $50/month, up to $200/month, or Flexible?"
  4. "How quickly to launch? ASAP (1-2 weeks), 1 month, 2-3 months, or No rush?"
  5. "What worries you most? Getting stuck, costs, security, wrong choices, or breaking things?"
  6. "Have you tried any tools yet? Name any and what you liked/disliked"
  7. "For your main feature, what's most important? Simple to build, works perfectly, looks amazing, or scales well?"
  8. "Do you want AI-powered features (chat, summarization)? If yes, list them and privacy constraints"

Level B (Developer):

  1. "Platform strategy and why?"
  2. "Preferred tech stack? Frontend, Backend, Database, Infrastructure, AI Integration"
  3. "Architecture pattern? Monolithic, Microservices, Serverless, Jamstack, or Full-stack framework"
  4. "Service choices? Auth, File storage, Payments, Email, Analytics"
  5. "AI coding tool preference? Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Cursor, VS Code + Copilot, Antigravity/equivalent agent-first IDE, or Mix?"
  6. "Development workflow? Git strategy, CI/CD, Testing priority, Environments"
  7. "Performance/scaling? Expected load, data volume, geographic distribution, real-time needs"
  8. "Security/compliance? Data sensitivity, compliance needs, auth method, API security"
  9. "AI/LLM features? Use cases, latency/cost constraints, data sensitivity"

Level C (In-Between):

  1. "Where should your app run? Web (easiest), Mobile, Both, or Help me decide?"
  2. "Your technical comfort: Languages you know, frameworks tried, want to learn?"
  3. "Building approach? No-code (fastest), Low-code with AI, Learn by doing, or Hire out?"
  4. "Feature complexity? Simple CRUD, real-time, file uploads, integrations, complex logic?"
  5. "Budget: Development tools, hosting, services - can you spend $X total?"
  6. "AI assistance preference? AI does everything, AI explains, AI helps when stuck, or Mix?"
  7. "Timeline reality: Hours/week available, launch date, beta test size?"
  8. "AI-powered features? List them and privacy constraints if yes"

Step 4: Verification Echo

After ALL questions:

> Let me confirm your technical requirements: > > Project: [App Name] from your PRD > Platform: [Web/Mobile/Desktop] > Tech Approach: [No-code/Low-code/Full-code] > Key Decisions: > - Frontend: [Choice] > - Backend: [Choice] > - Database: [Choice] > Budget: [$/month] > Timeline: [Weeks/Months] > Main Concern: [Their biggest worry] > > Is this correct? Any adjustments before I create the Technical Design?

Step 5: Generate Technical Design

After confirmation, generate a document tailored to their level.

Tech Design Structure:

  1. Recommended Approach - Best option with justification
  2. Alternative Options - Comparison table with pros/cons
  3. Project Setup - Step-by-step checklist
  4. Feature Implementation - How to build each PRD feature
  5. Design Implementation - Templates, design system, responsiveness
  6. Database & Storage - Schema, setup, hosting
  7. AI Assistance Strategy - Which tool for what task
  8. Deployment Plan - Platform, steps, backup options
  9. Cost Breakdown - Development and production phases
  10. Scaling Path - What to do at 100, 1000, 10000 users
  11. Limitations - What this approach can't do

Write to docs/TechDesign-[AppName]-MVP.md.

After Completion

Tell the user:

> Your Technical Design is saved to docs/TechDesign-[AppName]-MVP.md. > > Sanity Check: > - Does the tech stack match your budget? > - Is the timeline realistic for the complexity? > - Are there security concerns addressed? > > Next Step: Run /vibe-agents to generate your AGENTS.md and AI configuration files.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.