AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified Apache-2.0 Self-run

Analyzing Dns Logs For Exfiltration

skill-killvxk-cybersecurity-skills-zh-analyzing-dns-logs-for-exfiltration · by killvxk

>

No reviews yet
0 installs
32 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-killvxk-cybersecurity-skills-zh-analyzing-dns-logs-for-exfiltration

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-killvxk-cybersecurity-skills-zh-analyzing-dns-logs-for-exfiltration)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
4mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Analyzing Dns Logs For Exfiltration? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

分析 DNS 日志中的数据外泄

适用场景

在以下情况下使用本技能:

  • SOC 团队怀疑通过 DNS 隧道进行数据外泄以绕过防火墙/代理控制
  • 威胁情报显示对手使用基于 DNS 的 C2 信道(例如 Cobalt Strike DNS Beacon)
  • UEBA 检测到特定主机存在异常 DNS 查询量
  • 恶意软件分析揭示具有 DNS-over-HTTPS(DoH)或 DNS 隧道能力

不适用于标准 DNS 故障排除或可用性监控——本技能专注于与安全相关的 DNS 滥用检测。

前置条件

  • 已启用 DNS 查询日志记录(Windows DNS Server、Bind、Infoblox 或 Cisco Umbrella)
  • DNS 日志已摄取到 SIEM(Splunk 的 Stream:DNSdns 数据源或 Zeek DNS 日志)
  • 用于历史域名解析分析的被动 DNS 数据
  • 正常 DNS 行为基线(查询量、域名分布、TXT 记录频率)
  • Python(含 mathcollections 库)用于熵值计算

工作流程

步骤 1:通过子域名长度分析检测 DNS 隧道

DNS 隧道将数据编码在子域名标签中,产生异常长的查询:

index=dns sourcetype="stream:dns" query_type IN ("A", "AAAA", "TXT", "CNAME", "MX")
| eval domain_parts = split(query, ".")
| eval subdomain = mvindex(domain_parts, 0, mvcount(domain_parts)-3)
| eval subdomain_str = mvjoin(subdomain, ".")
| eval subdomain_len = len(subdomain_str)
| eval tld = mvindex(domain_parts, -1)
| eval registered_domain = mvindex(domain_parts, -2).".".tld
| where subdomain_len > 50
| stats count AS queries, dc(query) AS unique_queries,
        avg(subdomain_len) AS avg_subdomain_len,
        max(subdomain_len) AS max_subdomain_len,
        values(src_ip) AS sources
  by registered_domain
| where queries > 20
| sort - avg_subdomain_len
| table registered_domain, queries, unique_queries, avg_subdomain_len, max_subdomain_len, sources

步骤 2:检测高熵域名查询(DGA 检测)

域名生成算法(DGA)产生看似随机的域名:

index=dns sourcetype="stream:dns"
| eval domain_parts = split(query, ".")
| eval sld = mvindex(domain_parts, -2)
| eval sld_len = len(sld)
| eval char_count = sld_len
| eval vowels = len(replace(sld, "[^aeiou]", ""))
| eval consonants = len(replace(sld, "[^bcdfghjklmnpqrstvwxyz]", ""))
| eval digits = len(replace(sld, "[^0-9]", ""))
| eval vowel_ratio = if(char_count > 0, vowels / char_count, 0)
| eval digit_ratio = if(char_count > 0, digits / char_count, 0)
| where sld_len > 12 AND (vowel_ratio  0.3)
| stats count AS queries, dc(query) AS unique_domains, values(src_ip) AS sources
  by query
| where unique_domains > 10
| sort - queries

基于 Python 的 DNS 查询香农熵(Shannon Entropy)计算:

import math
from collections import Counter

def shannon_entropy(text):
    """计算字符串的香农熵"""
    if not text:
        return 0
    counter = Counter(text.lower())
    length = len(text)
    entropy = -sum(
        (count / length) * math.log2(count / length)
        for count in counter.values()
    )
    return round(entropy, 4)

# 测试示例
normal_domain = "google"           # 低熵
dga_domain = "x8kj2m9p4qw7n"      # 高熵
tunnel_subdomain = "aGVsbG8gd29ybGQ.evil.com"  # Base64 编码的数据

print(f"正常: {shannon_entropy(normal_domain)}")     # ~2.25
print(f"DGA:  {shannon_entropy(dga_domain)}")         # ~3.70
print(f"隧道: {shannon_entropy(tunnel_subdomain)}")   # ~3.50

# 阈值:子域名熵值 > 3.5 = 可能是隧道/DGA

Splunk 熵值评分实现:

index=dns sourcetype="stream:dns"
| eval domain_parts = split(query, ".")
| eval check_string = mvindex(domain_parts, 0)
| eval check_len = len(check_string)
| where check_len > 8
| eval chars = split(check_string, "")
| stats count AS total_chars, dc(chars) AS unique_chars by query, src_ip, check_string, check_len
| eval entropy_estimate = log(unique_chars, 2) * (unique_chars / check_len)
| where entropy_estimate > 3.5
| stats count AS high_entropy_queries, dc(query) AS unique_queries by src_ip
| where high_entropy_queries > 50
| sort - high_entropy_queries

步骤 3:检测异常 DNS 查询量

识别产生异常 DNS 流量的主机:

index=dns sourcetype="stream:dns" earliest=-24h
| bin _time span=1h
| stats count AS queries, dc(query) AS unique_domains by src_ip, _time
| eventstats avg(queries) AS avg_queries, stdev(queries) AS stdev_queries by src_ip
| eval z_score = (queries - avg_queries) / stdev_queries
| where z_score > 3 OR queries > 5000
| sort - z_score
| table _time, src_ip, queries, unique_domains, avg_queries, z_score

检测 TXT 记录滥用(常见隧道方法):

index=dns sourcetype="stream:dns" query_type="TXT"
| stats count AS txt_queries, dc(query) AS unique_txt_domains,
        values(query) AS domains by src_ip
| where txt_queries > 100
| eval suspicion = case(
    txt_queries > 1000, "CRITICAL — 可能是 DNS 隧道",
    txt_queries > 500, "HIGH — 可能是 DNS 隧道",
    txt_queries > 100, "MEDIUM — 异常 TXT 查询量"
  )
| sort - txt_queries
| table src_ip, txt_queries, unique_txt_domains, suspicion

步骤 4:检测已知 DNS 隧道工具

搜索常见 DNS 隧道工具的特征:

index=dns sourcetype="stream:dns"
| eval query_lower = lower(query)
| where (
    match(query_lower, "\.dnscat\.") OR
    match(query_lower, "\.dns2tcp\.") OR
    match(query_lower, "\.iodine\.") OR
    match(query_lower, "\.dnscapy\.") OR
    match(query_lower, "\.cobalt.*\.beacon") OR
    query_type="NULL" OR
    (query_type="TXT" AND len(query) > 100)
  )
| stats count by src_ip, query, query_type
| sort - count

检测 DNS over HTTPS(DoH)绕过本地 DNS:

index=proxy OR index=firewall
dest IN ("1.1.1.1", "1.0.0.1", "8.8.8.8", "8.8.4.4",
         "9.9.9.9", "149.112.112.112", "208.67.222.222")
dest_port=443
| stats sum(bytes_out) AS total_bytes, count AS connections by src_ip, dest
| where connections > 100 OR total_bytes > 10485760
| eval alert = "可能的 DoH 绕过 — 通过 HTTPS 将 DNS 查询发送到公共解析器"
| sort - total_bytes

步骤 5:将 DNS 发现与终端数据关联

将可疑 DNS 与进程数据进行交叉参考:

index=dns src_ip="192.168.1.105" query="*.evil-tunnel.com" earliest=-24h
| stats count AS dns_queries, earliest(_time) AS first_query, latest(_time) AS last_query
  by src_ip, query
| join src_ip [
    search index=sysmon EventCode=3 DestinationPort=53 Computer="WORKSTATION-042"
    | stats count AS connections, values(Image) AS processes by SourceIp
    | rename SourceIp AS src_ip
  ]
| table src_ip, query, dns_queries, first_query, last_query, processes

步骤 6:估算数据外泄量

估算 DNS 查询中编码数据的体积:

index=dns src_ip="192.168.1.105" query="*.evil-tunnel.com" earliest=-24h
| eval domain_parts = split(query, ".")
| eval encoded_data = mvindex(domain_parts, 0)
| eval encoded_bytes = len(encoded_data)
| eval decoded_bytes = encoded_bytes * 0.75  -- Base64 解码因子
| stats sum(decoded_bytes) AS total_bytes_estimated, count AS total_queries,
        earliest(_time) AS first_seen, latest(_time) AS last_seen
| eval estimated_kb = round(total_bytes_estimated / 1024, 1)
| eval estimated_mb = round(total_bytes_estimated / 1048576, 2)
| eval duration_hours = round((last_seen - first_seen) / 3600, 1)
| eval rate_kbps = round(estimated_kb / (duration_hours * 3600) * 8, 2)
| table total_queries, estimated_mb, duration_hours, rate_kbps, first_seen, last_seen

核心概念

| 术语 | 定义 | |------|-----------| | DNS 隧道 | 将数据编码在 DNS 查询/响应中,通过 DNS 外泄数据或建立 C2 信道的技术 | | DGA | 域名生成算法——恶意软件技术,生成伪随机域名以提高 C2 韧性 | | 香农熵 | 字符串随机性的数学度量——域名中高熵(>3.5)表明存在 DGA 或隧道 | | TXT 记录滥用 | 利用 DNS TXT 记录(设计用于文本数据)作为数据隧道的高带宽信道 | | DNS over HTTPS(DoH) | 通过 HTTPS(端口 443)加密的 DNS 查询,绕过传统 DNS 监控 | | 被动 DNS | 历史 DNS 解析记录,显示某域名随时间解析到的 IP 地址 |

工具与系统

  • Splunk Stream:提供解析 DNS 查询数据的网络流量捕获插件,用于 SIEM 分析
  • Zeek(Bro):生成详细 DNS 事务日志的网络安全监视器
  • Cisco Umbrella(OpenDNS):云 DNS 安全平台,阻断恶意域名并记录查询数据
  • Infoblox DNS Firewall:提供基于 RPZ 阻断和详细查询日志的 DNS 层安全
  • Farsight DNSDB:被动 DNS 数据库,用于历史域名解析查询和基础设施映射

常见场景

  • Cobalt Strike DNS Beacon:检测向 C2 域定期发送含编码载荷的 TXT 查询
  • 数据外泄:大量唯一子域名查询,以 Base64/十六进制编码窃取的数据
  • DGA 恶意软件:检测对算法生成域名的 DNS 查询(高熵、无 Web 内容)
  • DNS-over-HTTPS 绕过:员工使用 DoH 绕过企业 DNS 过滤和监控
  • 慢速滴漏式外泄:低量 DNS 隧道保持在阈值告警以下(需要与基线比较)

输出格式

DNS 外泄分析 — WORKSTATION-042
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
时间段:      2024-03-14 至 2024-03-15
来源:        192.168.1.105(WORKSTATION-042,财务部门)

发现:
  [CRITICAL] 检测到 DNS 隧道至 evil-tunnel[.]com
    查询量:        18 小时内 12,847 次查询
    平均子域名长:  63 字符(正常值:<20)
    平均熵值:      3.82(阈值:3.5)
    查询类型:      TXT(89%)、A(11%)
    估算数据量:    约 4.7 MB 通过 DNS 外泄
    速率:          0.58 kbps(慢速滴漏模式)

  [HIGH] 已解析 DGA 类域名
    唯一 DGA 域名:  247 个域名已解析
    模式:          15 字符随机字母数字.xyz TLD
    熵值范围:      3.6 - 4.1

进程归因:
  进程:   svchost_update.exe(伪装——非合法 svchost)
  PID:    4892
  父进程:  explorer.exe
  哈希:   SHA256: a1b2c3d4...(VT: 34/72 恶意 — Cobalt Strike Beacon)

遏制措施:
  [已完成] 主机已通过 EDR 隔离
  [已完成] 域名 evil-tunnel[.]com 已添加到 DNS 沉洞
  [已完成] 事件 IR-2024-0448 已创建

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.