Install
$ agentstack add skill-kinhluan-skills-conference-paper ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Conference Paper
Purpose: Write and present research at academic conferences — the primary publication venue in CS.
When to use:
- Writing conference paper (4-6 pages)
- Preparing poster abstract
- Creating oral/poster presentation
- Preparing camera-ready version
Links to:
paper-writing— general writing skillsjournal-q1-polish— polish for top venuespublication-strategy— venue selectiontechnical-english-cs— academic Englishdefense-prep— presentation skills
Conference Paper vs Journal Paper
| Aspect | Conference | Journal | |--------|-----------|---------| | Length | 4-6 pages (double-column) | 8-12 pages (single/double) | | Review time | 2-3 months | 3-12 months | | Acceptance rate | 20-30% (top: 15-25%) | 20-40% | | Novelty emphasis | High (new ideas) | Moderate (thoroughness) | | Experiments | Key results | Comprehensive | | Related work | Concise | Extensive | | Presentation | Required | Optional | | Proceedings | Yes (archival) | Yes | | Impact | Immediate | Long-term |
Conference Paper Structure (4-6 pages)
Title
Abstract (150-200 words)
1. Introduction (0.5-1 page)
- Problem + motivation (2 paragraphs)
- Gap (1 paragraph)
- Contributions (bulleted list)
2. Related Work (0.5-1 page)
- 2-3 paragraphs grouping related approaches
- End each: "Unlike [X], we [difference]"
3. Method (1.5-2 pages)
- Problem formulation
- System overview (1 figure)
- Key components (algorithm + explanation)
- Complexity: O(...)
4. Experiments (1-1.5 pages)
- Setup: datasets, baselines, metrics
- Main results (1 table)
- Ablation (1 table)
- Analysis (1 figure optional)
5. Conclusion (0.25 page)
- Summary + future work
References (≤1 page)
Page Budget
| Section | Pages | Notes | |---------|-------|-------| | Abstract | 0.2 | 150-200 words | | Introduction | 0.75 | Funnel structure | | Related Work | 0.75 | 2-3 paragraphs | | Method | 1.5 | Core contribution | | Experiments | 1.25 | Key results only | | Conclusion | 0.25 | Brief | | References | 0.5 | 20-30 refs | | Total | 5 | ±0.5 for 4-6 page limit |
Poster Abstract (1 page)
# [Title]
**Authors:** [Names]
**Affiliation:** [University]
## Abstract
[250-300 words]
- Problem (2 sentences)
- Gap (1 sentence)
- Method (3-4 sentences)
- Results (2-3 sentences)
- Impact (1 sentence)
## Key Figure
[1 main figure showing concept or results]
## References
[3-5 key references]
Poster Design
Layout (A0 portrait: 841 × 1189 mm)
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ TITLE │
│ Authors & Affiliation │
├──────────────┬──────────────┬───────────────┤
│ Introduction │ Method │ Related Work │
│ + Motivation │ (Figure) │ │
├──────────────┼──────────────┼───────────────┤
│ Results │ Results │ Conclusion │
│ (Table) │ (Figure) │ + Future │
├──────────────┴──────────────┴───────────────┤
│ References & Contact │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Poster Checklist
- [ ] Title readable from 3m distance
- [ ] Figures readable from 1.5m distance
- [ ] Text readable from 1m distance
- [ ] QR code to paper/code
- [ ] Contact email visible
- [ ] Color-blind friendly palette
- [ ] Minimal text (figures > text)
Oral Presentation (15-20 min)
Slide Structure
Slide 1: Title + Authors (30 sec)
Slide 2: Outline (15 sec)
Slide 3-4: Problem & Motivation (2 min)
Slide 5: Related Work (1 min)
Slide 6-8: Method (5 min)
- Overview (1 slide)
- Key component 1 (1 slide)
- Key component 2 (1 slide)
Slide 9-11: Experiments (4 min)
- Setup (1 slide)
- Main results (1 slide)
- Ablation/Analysis (1 slide)
Slide 12: Conclusion & Future Work (1 min)
Slide 13: Q&A (30 sec)
Timing Guide
| Section | Time | Slides | |---------|------|--------| | Intro + Problem | 2 min | 2-3 | | Related Work | 1 min | 1 | | Method | 5 min | 3-4 | | Experiments | 4 min | 2-3 | | Conclusion | 1 min | 1 | | Buffer | 2 min | — | | Total | 15 min | 10-12 |
Presentation Tips
- Practice 3 times minimum
- Time yourself (strict 15 min)
- Prepare for common questions
- Have backup slides for deep-dive
- Speak slowly (120-150 words/min)
Camera-Ready Preparation
Checklist
- [ ] Address all reviewer comments
- [ ] Update results if improved
- [ ] Fix all typos/formatting
- [ ] Check figure quality (300 DPI)
- [ ] Verify references complete
- [ ] Add acknowledgments
- [ ] Check page limits
- [ ] Submit source files + PDF
- [ ] Sign copyright form
- [ ] Register for conference
Response to Reviews (for revision)
# Response to Reviewers
## Summary of Changes
[Bulleted list of major changes]
## Reviewer 1
### Comment 1: "[quote]"
**Response:** [explanation]
**Changes:** [what was changed, page/line]
### Comment 2: "[quote]"
...
## Reviewer 2
...
Conference-Specific Formats
NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR
- 4 pages main + unlimited appendix
- Double-blind review
- NeurIPS LaTeX template
- Broader Impact statement (NeurIPS)
CVPR/ICCV/ECCV
- 8 pages (excluding references)
- Double-blind review
- IEEE template
- Supplementary material
ACL/EMNLP/NAACL
- 8 pages (long) / 4 pages (short)
- Double-blind review
- ACL template
- Ethics statement
IEEE Conferences (custom)
- 4-6 pages
- IEEE double-column template
- IEEE PDF eXpress compliance
Integration Flow
sota-survey (find venues)
↓
publication-strategy (choose venue)
↓
paper-writing (draft)
↓
conference-paper (this skill)
├── Write paper (4-6 pages)
├── Prepare poster
├── Prepare oral slides
└── Camera-ready
↓
journal-q1-polish (if extending to journal)
↓
internal-critique (self-review)
↓
progress-report (report to advisor)
↓
thesis-writing (integrate into thesis)
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: kinhluan
- Source: kinhluan/skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.