AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Quality Validation

skill-komluk-scaffolding-quality-validation · by komluk

Score ResearchPacks (>=80) and Implementation Plans (>=85) against quality gates. TRIGGER when: gating research or a plan before implementation. SKIP: writing or running tests (use testing-strategy); security threat review (use security-review-checklists).

No reviews yet
0 installs
18 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-komluk-scaffolding-quality-validation

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Are you the author of Quality Validation? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Quality Validation Skill

Systematic validation ensuring ResearchPacks and Implementation Plans meet quality standards before implementation.

Auto-Invoke Triggers

  • ResearchPack completion requires validation
  • Implementation Plan requires validation before coding
  • User requests quality check
  • Proceeding to next workflow phase (quality gate)

Quality Gates

Gate 1: Research → Planning

  • Trigger: ResearchPack completion
  • Pass: Score ≥ 80
  • Fail: Block, return defects

Gate 2: Planning → Implementation

  • Trigger: Implementation Plan completion
  • Pass: Score ≥ 85 AND APIs match
  • Fail: Block, return defects
  • Note: the ≥ 85 plan gate / design review may run on the opus tier (architect/analyst on model: opus, effort: high) for higher rigor. See docs/model-tiers.md.

Gate 3: Implementation → Completion

  • Trigger: Code complete
  • Pass: your project's validate/lint/test command passes (e.g. npm run validate, pytest, make check, cargo test)
  • Fail: Trigger self-correction (max 3 attempts)

ResearchPack Validation (100 pts, pass: 80)

Completeness (40 pts)

  • Library/API with version: 10 pts
  • 3+ key APIs documented: 10 pts
  • Setup/configuration steps: 10 pts
  • 1+ complete code examples: 10 pts

Accuracy (30 pts)

  • API signatures match official docs: 15 pts
  • Version numbers correct: 5 pts
  • All URLs valid, official sources: 10 pts

Citation (20 pts)

  • Every API has source URL: 10 pts
  • Version/section references: 5 pts
  • Confidence level stated: 5 pts

Actionability (10 pts)

  • Implementation checklist: 5 pts
  • Open questions identified: 5 pts

Implementation Plan Validation (100 pts, pass: 85)

Completeness (35 pts)

  • All file changes listed: 10 pts
  • Step-by-step sequence: 10 pts
  • Verification per step: 10 pts
  • Test plan included: 5 pts

Safety (30 pts)

  • Rollback plan complete: 15 pts
  • Risk assessment (3+ risks): 10 pts
  • Minimal changes: 5 pts

Clarity (20 pts)

  • Actionable steps: 10 pts
  • Success criteria defined: 5 pts
  • Time estimates: 5 pts

Alignment (15 pts)

  • Plan matches ResearchPack: 10 pts
  • Addresses all requirements: 5 pts

Validation Commands

Run your project's own validate/lint/type-check/test command at the completion gate. The exact command depends on your stack — substitute the equivalents below.

| Step | Generic intent | Example (Node/TS) | Example (Python) | |------|----------------|-------------------|------------------| | Type check | Static type safety | npm run type-check | mypy . | | Lint | Style / static analysis | npm run lint | ruff check . | | Build | Compile / package | npm run build | python -m build | | Tests | Behavioral verification | npm test | pytest | | Full gate | One command runs all | npm run validate | make check |

# Example (Node/TypeScript): full validation
npm run validate

# Example (Python): full validation
pytest && ruff check . && mypy .

Common Failures

| Failure | Description | |---------|-------------| | Hallucinated APIs | APIs not in official docs | | Version mismatch | Wrong version in research | | Missing citations | No source URLs | | No rollback plan | Missing reversion procedure | | Ambiguous steps | Non-actionable instructions | | API misalignment | Plan uses undocumented APIs |

Validation Output Format

## Validation Report

**Artifact**: [ResearchPack|ImplementationPlan]
**Score**: XX/100
**Result**: [PASS|FAIL]

### Scoring Breakdown
- Completeness: XX/40
- Accuracy: XX/30
- Citation: XX/20
- Actionability: XX/10

### Defects Found
1. [Defect description]
2. [Defect description]

### Recommendations
- [Fix suggestion]

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.