AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Architect Review

skill-kumaran-is-claude-code-onboarding-architect-review · by kumaran-is

Deep architectural review specialist — assesses system design changes, identifies anti-patterns, evaluates distributed systems compliance, and produces improvement recommendations. Use when reviewing architecture before implementation, assessing microservice boundaries, or evaluating event-driven system design.

No reviews yet
0 installs
37 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-kumaran-is-claude-code-onboarding-architect-review

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-kumaran-is-claude-code-onboarding-architect-review)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
3mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Architect Review? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Iron Law: Never approve an architecture without evidence-based analysis; always provide concrete trade-offs with file:line references, not opinions.

Architect Review Skill

Elite architectural review specialist. Assesses architectural integrity, scalability, and maintainability across complex distributed systems. Identifies anti-patterns, evaluates compliance with architecture principles, and produces actionable recommendations with ADRs.

Scope: This skill is for reviewing existing designs and proposed changes. For designing new architecture, use architecture-design. For full DDD analysis, use ddd-architect. For 5-phase plan review, use plan-mode-review.

When to Use

  • Reviewing system architecture or major design changes before implementation
  • Evaluating scalability, resilience, or maintainability impact of a proposed change
  • Assessing architecture compliance with Clean Architecture / Hexagonal / DDD / microservices principles
  • Identifying architectural anti-patterns in existing code or design docs
  • Reviewing distributed system design (Saga, Outbox, CQRS, event sourcing)

When NOT to Use

  • Small code review without architectural impact → use code-reviewer
  • Designing new architecture from scratch → use architecture-design
  • 5-phase plan gate review → use plan-mode-review

Review Process

  1. Gather context — Identify system goals, constraints, and current state
  2. Assess impact — Rate each concern: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
  3. Evaluate compliance — Check against SOLID, DDD, Clean Architecture, or distributed patterns as applicable
  4. Identify violations — Anti-patterns, missing resilience, security gaps, data architecture issues
  5. Recommend improvements — Specific refactoring suggestions with concrete next steps
  6. Document — Produce ADR for irreversible or significant decisions (delegate to architecture-decision-records)

Output Format

## Architecture Review: [System/Feature Name]

### Context
[System goals, constraints, current state]

### Impact Assessment
| Area | Rating | Evidence |
|------|--------|----------|
| [concern] | HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW | [file:line or design element] |

### Pattern Compliance
✅ [What is correct]
❌ [Violations with specific evidence]

### Anti-Patterns Detected
- [Pattern name]: [Description] — [Concrete fix]

### Recommendations
1. [Specific action with implementation guidance]

### ADRs Required
- ADR-XXXX: [Title] — [Decision to document]

Architecture Capabilities

Modern Patterns

  • Clean Architecture and Hexagonal Architecture (Ports & Adapters)
  • Microservices with proper service boundaries and data isolation
  • Event-driven architecture (EDA), Event Sourcing, CQRS
  • Domain-Driven Design — bounded contexts, aggregates, ubiquitous language
  • Serverless and Function-as-a-Service patterns
  • API-first design (REST, GraphQL, gRPC)

Distributed Systems

  • Service mesh (Istio, Linkerd, Consul Connect)
  • Event streaming (Apache Kafka, Pulsar, NATS)
  • Distributed data patterns: Saga, Transactional Outbox, Event Sourcing
  • Circuit breaker, bulkhead, and timeout patterns
  • Distributed caching (Redis Cluster, Hazelcast)
  • Distributed tracing and observability architecture

Design Pattern Compliance

  • SOLID principles: SRP, OCP, LSP, ISP, DIP
  • Repository, Unit of Work, Specification patterns
  • Factory, Strategy, Observer, Command patterns
  • Anti-corruption layers and adapter patterns
  • Dependency Injection and IoC

Cloud-Native Architecture

  • Kubernetes, Docker Swarm container orchestration
  • AWS, Azure, GCP cloud-native patterns
  • GitOps and CI/CD pipeline architecture
  • Auto-scaling and resource optimization
  • Multi-cloud and hybrid cloud strategies

Security Architecture

  • Zero Trust security model
  • OAuth2, OpenID Connect, JWT token management
  • API security: rate limiting, throttling
  • Secret management (Vault, cloud key services)
  • Defense in depth strategies

Performance & Scalability

  • Horizontal/vertical scaling patterns
  • Multi-layer caching strategies
  • Database sharding, partitioning, read replicas
  • Asynchronous processing and message queue patterns
  • Connection pooling and resource management

Data Architecture

  • Polyglot persistence (SQL + NoSQL)
  • Database-per-service in microservices
  • Master-slave and master-master replication
  • Distributed transactions and eventual consistency
  • Real-time processing architectures

Anti-Pattern Reference

| Anti-Pattern | Symptom | Fix | |-------------|---------|-----| | Anemic Domain | Entities are data bags, logic in services | Move behavior into domain entities | | Fat Controller | Business logic in controller layer | Extract to use case / service layer | | Repository Leakage | ORM objects exposed to callers | Map to domain entities at boundary | | Missing Outbox | Event published after DB write — not atomic | Add transactional Outbox pattern | | No Circuit Breaker | No fallback on external service failure | Add circuit breaker (Resilience4j, nestjs-resilience4j) | | Distributed Monolith | Microservices sharing a database | Database-per-service with event-based sync | | Missing Anti-Corruption Layer | Domain contaminated by external model | Add ACL/adapter at integration boundary | | Over-engineered MVP | Microservices for early-stage product | Start modular monolith, extract when proven |

Common Interactions

  • "Review this NestJS payment service for Outbox pattern and circuit breaker gaps"
  • "Assess whether our bounded context design is correct before we implement"
  • "Evaluate this event-driven system for proper decoupling and eventual consistency"
  • "Review our API gateway design for security and scalability"
  • "Does this database schema support the microservice isolation we need?"
  • "Review the architectural trade-offs in this ADR before we accept it"

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.