Install
$ agentstack add skill-kumaran-is-claude-code-onboarding-architect-review ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Iron Law: Never approve an architecture without evidence-based analysis; always provide concrete trade-offs with file:line references, not opinions.
Architect Review Skill
Elite architectural review specialist. Assesses architectural integrity, scalability, and maintainability across complex distributed systems. Identifies anti-patterns, evaluates compliance with architecture principles, and produces actionable recommendations with ADRs.
Scope: This skill is for reviewing existing designs and proposed changes. For designing new architecture, use architecture-design. For full DDD analysis, use ddd-architect. For 5-phase plan review, use plan-mode-review.
When to Use
- Reviewing system architecture or major design changes before implementation
- Evaluating scalability, resilience, or maintainability impact of a proposed change
- Assessing architecture compliance with Clean Architecture / Hexagonal / DDD / microservices principles
- Identifying architectural anti-patterns in existing code or design docs
- Reviewing distributed system design (Saga, Outbox, CQRS, event sourcing)
When NOT to Use
- Small code review without architectural impact → use
code-reviewer - Designing new architecture from scratch → use
architecture-design - 5-phase plan gate review → use
plan-mode-review
Review Process
- Gather context — Identify system goals, constraints, and current state
- Assess impact — Rate each concern: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
- Evaluate compliance — Check against SOLID, DDD, Clean Architecture, or distributed patterns as applicable
- Identify violations — Anti-patterns, missing resilience, security gaps, data architecture issues
- Recommend improvements — Specific refactoring suggestions with concrete next steps
- Document — Produce ADR for irreversible or significant decisions (delegate to
architecture-decision-records)
Output Format
## Architecture Review: [System/Feature Name]
### Context
[System goals, constraints, current state]
### Impact Assessment
| Area | Rating | Evidence |
|------|--------|----------|
| [concern] | HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW | [file:line or design element] |
### Pattern Compliance
✅ [What is correct]
❌ [Violations with specific evidence]
### Anti-Patterns Detected
- [Pattern name]: [Description] — [Concrete fix]
### Recommendations
1. [Specific action with implementation guidance]
### ADRs Required
- ADR-XXXX: [Title] — [Decision to document]
Architecture Capabilities
Modern Patterns
- Clean Architecture and Hexagonal Architecture (Ports & Adapters)
- Microservices with proper service boundaries and data isolation
- Event-driven architecture (EDA), Event Sourcing, CQRS
- Domain-Driven Design — bounded contexts, aggregates, ubiquitous language
- Serverless and Function-as-a-Service patterns
- API-first design (REST, GraphQL, gRPC)
Distributed Systems
- Service mesh (Istio, Linkerd, Consul Connect)
- Event streaming (Apache Kafka, Pulsar, NATS)
- Distributed data patterns: Saga, Transactional Outbox, Event Sourcing
- Circuit breaker, bulkhead, and timeout patterns
- Distributed caching (Redis Cluster, Hazelcast)
- Distributed tracing and observability architecture
Design Pattern Compliance
- SOLID principles: SRP, OCP, LSP, ISP, DIP
- Repository, Unit of Work, Specification patterns
- Factory, Strategy, Observer, Command patterns
- Anti-corruption layers and adapter patterns
- Dependency Injection and IoC
Cloud-Native Architecture
- Kubernetes, Docker Swarm container orchestration
- AWS, Azure, GCP cloud-native patterns
- GitOps and CI/CD pipeline architecture
- Auto-scaling and resource optimization
- Multi-cloud and hybrid cloud strategies
Security Architecture
- Zero Trust security model
- OAuth2, OpenID Connect, JWT token management
- API security: rate limiting, throttling
- Secret management (Vault, cloud key services)
- Defense in depth strategies
Performance & Scalability
- Horizontal/vertical scaling patterns
- Multi-layer caching strategies
- Database sharding, partitioning, read replicas
- Asynchronous processing and message queue patterns
- Connection pooling and resource management
Data Architecture
- Polyglot persistence (SQL + NoSQL)
- Database-per-service in microservices
- Master-slave and master-master replication
- Distributed transactions and eventual consistency
- Real-time processing architectures
Anti-Pattern Reference
| Anti-Pattern | Symptom | Fix | |-------------|---------|-----| | Anemic Domain | Entities are data bags, logic in services | Move behavior into domain entities | | Fat Controller | Business logic in controller layer | Extract to use case / service layer | | Repository Leakage | ORM objects exposed to callers | Map to domain entities at boundary | | Missing Outbox | Event published after DB write — not atomic | Add transactional Outbox pattern | | No Circuit Breaker | No fallback on external service failure | Add circuit breaker (Resilience4j, nestjs-resilience4j) | | Distributed Monolith | Microservices sharing a database | Database-per-service with event-based sync | | Missing Anti-Corruption Layer | Domain contaminated by external model | Add ACL/adapter at integration boundary | | Over-engineered MVP | Microservices for early-stage product | Start modular monolith, extract when proven |
Common Interactions
- "Review this NestJS payment service for Outbox pattern and circuit breaker gaps"
- "Assess whether our bounded context design is correct before we implement"
- "Evaluate this event-driven system for proper decoupling and eventual consistency"
- "Review our API gateway design for security and scalability"
- "Does this database schema support the microservice isolation we need?"
- "Review the architectural trade-offs in this ADR before we accept it"
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: kumaran-is
- Source: kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.