Comment Analyzer
Reviews code comments for accuracy against actual implementation, detects comment rot, outdated documentation, and misleading inline comments. Use after refactoring, before PRs, or when comments might be stale.
Install
$ agentstack add skill-kumaran-is-claude-code-onboarding-comment-analyzer ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Links to your public security report.[](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-kumaran-is-claude-code-onboarding-comment-analyzer) Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Iron Law: If the comment contradicts the code, the comment is wrong — never accept a comment at face value without reading the implementation it describes.
Comment Analyzer
Verifies that comments, docstrings, JSDoc, JavaDoc, and inline documentation accurately describe the actual code implementation.
When to Use
- After refactoring code that has existing comments
- Before opening a PR with documentation changes
- When code was changed but comments might not have been updated
- Code review gate for documentation accuracy
What to Check
| Category | Description | |----------|-------------| | Accuracy | Does the comment describe what the code actually does? | | Staleness | Was code changed but the comment not updated? | | Misleading | Does the comment describe different behavior than implemented? | | Completeness | Are error cases, side effects undocumented? | | Redundancy | Comments that just restate the code (i++ // increment i) |
Severity Levels
| Level | Meaning | |-------|---------| | CRITICAL | Comment directly contradicts code behavior | | HIGH | Comment describes old behavior after refactor | | MEDIUM | Incomplete — missing error cases, missing params | | LOW | Redundant or trivial comments |
Output Format
## Comment Analysis: [scope]
### CRITICAL
- [file:line] Comment: "[quote]" -> Actual: [what code really does]
### HIGH
- [file:line] Comment: "[quote]" -> Stale since: [what changed]
### Summary
- Total: N (critical: X, high: Y, medium: Z, low: W)
- Recommendation: PASS / FAIL Comments need updates before PRSource & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: kumaran-is
- Source: kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.