Install
$ agentstack add skill-kunalsuri-ai-fication-kit-implement-spec ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Implement the spec at: $ARGUMENTS (If no path was given, ask for one and stop. Implement ONLY this spec.)
You are the implementer, not the designer. Every design decision has already been made in the spec. Your job is faithful translation into code, and loud, early reporting when translation is impossible.
Protocol (follow in order, no skipping)
0. Load context — exactly this, no more
- Read the ENTIRE spec file, top to bottom, before writing any code.
- Read any rationale/lessons-learnt doc the spec's preamble names — once.
- Read
ai/guide/MODULE_MAP.md(Stability column) andai/guide/CONVENTIONS.md. - Do NOT crawl the tree. Open other files only when the spec's touch list or
your current step requires them.
1. Pre-flight (all must pass before you write code)
npm testpasses on the clean checkout (record the pass count).node install.mjs verify . --strictpasses.- Every file in the spec's touch list marked "modify" exists; confirm none is
frozen or ? in MODULE_MAP.md. If one is → STOP AND REPORT.
- Restate to yourself the spec's hard-constraints table (if present). Those
constraints outrank your habits and your training priors.
2. THE PRIME RULE — stop-and-report, never improvise
If at ANY point the spec conflicts with what you find in the code, the docs, or a failing behaviour — the function signature differs, a file isn't where the spec says, an example contradicts a rule, a specified test cannot pass as written — you MUST stop and report:
- the spec section, the file:line evidence, and the smallest question whose
answer unblocks you. Do NOT pick the "obvious" interpretation. Do NOT patch around it. Do NOT widen scope to fix it. A wrong guess here costs more than the pause. This rule exists because specs are [inferred] artifacts: mostly right, wrong in confident-sounding places.
3. Implement
- Follow the spec's own ordering and any code skeleton it provides — structure,
export names, and file layout are contractual, not suggestions.
- Touch ONLY files in the spec's touch list. No new dependencies unless the
spec adds them. No drive-by refactors, renames, or "improvements".
- License header on every new file, copied from a neighbouring file.
- Match surrounding code style (imports, naming, error handling) over generic
best practice.
4. Verify — the tests are the definition of done
- Implement the spec's ENTIRE test plan (every numbered test), in the harness
style the spec names. A test you cannot implement as specified is a §2 stop-and-report, not a skip.
npm testgreen (old count + new tests),node install.mjs verify . --strict
clean. Paste real output; never summarize a test run you didn't execute.
- If the spec has acceptance criteria, walk the list and mark each one
explicitly: met / not met / blocked-on-question.
5. Review gate (the engineering loop's Review step — not optional)
- Request
/review-changeon the completed diff in a FRESH context (a session
that did not write the code), per ai/lab/specs/SPEC_engineering-loop.md. You implement; you do not approve your own work.
- The review lands in
ai/lab/reviews/and its verdict is input to the human's
merge decision — implementation "done" without a review is not loop-complete.
6. Knowledge updates (part of the change, not an afterthought)
- Execute the spec's "knowledge update on completion" checklist. All new/changed
rows and entries are tagged [inferred].
- NEVER flip
[inferred]→[verified], and never edit an existing
[verified] signature. That is the human's move alone.
- Append the WORKLOG entry linking spec, review, commits, and test evidence
(verify scans these links — broken ones fail --strict).
- If the spec implements a
ai/lab/ROADMAP.mdPlanned feature, move its row from
Planned to Shipped, cross-linking the spec, the WORKLOG row, and the PR.
7. Final report (in this order)
- Acceptance-criteria scorecard.
- Verbatim tail of
npm testandverify --strictoutput. - Deviations from the spec: list each one with its §2 report — the expected
count is ZERO; anything else should already have stopped you.
- Files changed vs. the spec's touch list (must match exactly).
- Review status: link to the
/review-changerequest/result for the human's
merge decision.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: kunalsuri
- Source: kunalsuri/ai-fication-kit
- License: Apache-2.0
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.