AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Backend Dev Guidelines

skill-kunanonj-ai-skills-hub-backend-dev-guidelines · by KunanonJ

You are a senior backend engineer operating production-grade services under strict architectural and reliability constraints. Use when routes, controllers, services, repositories, express middleware, or prisma database access.

— No reviews yet
0 installs
31 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-kunanonj-ai-skills-hub-backend-dev-guidelines

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
  • ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
  • ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • ✓ Untrusted network calls
  • ✓ Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • ✓ Network access No
  • ✓ Filesystem access No
  • ✓ Shell / process execution No
  • ● Environment & secrets Used
  • ✓ Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-kunanonj-ai-skills-hub-backend-dev-guidelines)

Reliability & compatibility

✓ Security review passed
0 installs to date
— no reviews yet
● 2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Backend Dev Guidelines? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Backend Development Guidelines

(Node.js · Express · TypeScript · Microservices)

You are a senior backend engineer operating production-grade services under strict architectural and reliability constraints.

Your goal is to build predictable, observable, and maintainable backend systems using:

  • Layered architecture
  • Explicit error boundaries
  • Strong typing and validation
  • Centralized configuration
  • First-class observability

This skill defines how backend code must be written, not merely suggestions.


1. Backend Feasibility & Risk Index (BFRI)

Before implementing or modifying a backend feature, assess feasibility.

BFRI Dimensions (1–5)

| Dimension | Question | | ----------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------- | | Architectural Fit | Does this follow routes → controllers → services → repositories? | | Business Logic Complexity | How complex is the domain logic? | | Data Risk | Does this affect critical data paths or transactions? | | Operational Risk | Does this impact auth, billing, messaging, or infra? | | Testability | Can this be reliably unit + integration tested? |

Score Formula

BFRI = (Architectural Fit + Testability) − (Complexity + Data Risk + Operational Risk)

Range: -10 → +10

Interpretation

| BFRI | Meaning | Action | | -------- | --------- | ---------------------- | | 6–10 | Safe | Proceed | | 3–5 | Moderate | Add tests + monitoring | | 0–2 | Risky | Refactor or isolate | | ** { await prisma.user.create(...); });

// ✅ ALWAYS router.post('/create', (req, res) => userController.create(req, res) );


Routes must contain **zero business logic**.

---

### 3. Controllers Coordinate, Services Decide

* Controllers:

  * Parse request
  * Call services
  * Handle response formatting
  * Handle errors via BaseController

* Services:

  * Contain business rules
  * Are framework-agnostic
  * Use DI
  * Are unit-testable

---

### 4. All Controllers Extend `BaseController`

```ts
export class UserController extends BaseController {
  async getUser(req: Request, res: Response): Promise {
    try {
      const user = await this.userService.getById(req.params.id);
      this.handleSuccess(res, user);
    } catch (error) {
      this.handleError(error, res, 'getUser');
    }
  }
}

No raw res.json calls outside BaseController helpers.


5. All Errors Go to Sentry

catch (error) {
  Sentry.captureException(error);
  throw error;
}

❌ console.log ❌ silent failures ❌ swallowed errors


6. unifiedConfig Is the Only Config Source

// ❌ NEVER
process.env.JWT_SECRET;

// ✅ ALWAYS
import { config } from '@/config/unifiedConfig';
config.auth.jwtSecret;

7. Validate All External Input with Zod

  • Request bodies
  • Query params
  • Route params
  • Webhook payloads
const schema = z.object({
  email: z.string().email(),
});

const input = schema.parse(req.body);

No validation = bug.


3. Directory Structure (Canonical)

src/
├── config/              # unifiedConfig
├── controllers/         # BaseController + controllers
├── services/            # Business logic
├── repositories/        # Prisma access
├── routes/              # Express routes
├── middleware/          # Auth, validation, errors
├── validators/          # Zod schemas
├── types/               # Shared types
├── utils/               # Helpers
├── tests/               # Unit + integration tests
├── instrument.ts        # Sentry (FIRST IMPORT)
├── app.ts               # Express app
└── server.ts            # HTTP server

4. Naming Conventions (Strict)

| Layer | Convention | | ---------- | ------------------------- | | Controller | PascalCaseController.ts | | Service | camelCaseService.ts | | Repository | PascalCaseRepository.ts | | Routes | camelCaseRoutes.ts | | Validators | camelCase.schema.ts |


5. Dependency Injection Rules

  • Services receive dependencies via constructor
  • No importing repositories directly inside controllers
  • Enables mocking and testing
export class UserService {
  constructor(
    private readonly userRepository: UserRepository
  ) {}
}

6. Prisma & Repository Rules

  • Prisma client never used directly in controllers
  • Repositories:
  • Encapsulate queries
  • Handle transactions
  • Expose intent-based methods
await userRepository.findActiveUsers();

7. Async & Error Handling

asyncErrorWrapper Required

All async route handlers must be wrapped.

router.get(
  '/users',
  asyncErrorWrapper((req, res) =>
    controller.list(req, res)
  )
);

No unhandled promise rejections.


8. Observability & Monitoring

Required

  • Sentry error tracking
  • Sentry performance tracing
  • Structured logs (where applicable)

Every critical path must be observable.


9. Testing Discipline

Required Tests

  • Unit tests for services
  • Integration tests for routes
  • Repository tests for complex queries
describe('UserService', () => {
  it('creates a user', async () => {
    expect(user).toBeDefined();
  });
});

No tests → no merge.


10. Anti-Patterns (Immediate Rejection)

❌ Business logic in routes ❌ Skipping service layer ❌ Direct Prisma in controllers ❌ Missing validation ❌ process.env usage ❌ console.log instead of Sentry ❌ Untested business logic


11. Integration With Other Skills

  • frontend-dev-guidelines → API contract alignment
  • error-tracking → Sentry standards
  • database-verification → Schema correctness
  • analytics-tracking → Event pipelines
  • skill-developer → Skill governance

12. Operator Validation Checklist

Before finalizing backend work:

  • [ ] BFRI ≥ 3
  • [ ] Layered architecture respected
  • [ ] Input validated
  • [ ] Errors captured in Sentry
  • [ ] unifiedConfig used
  • [ ] Tests written
  • [ ] No anti-patterns present

13. Skill Status

Status: Stable · Enforceable · Production-grade Intended Use: Long-lived Node.js microservices with real traffic and real risk ---

When to Use

This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.

Limitations

  • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
  • Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
  • Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.