AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Codebase Exploration

skill-kwhorne-elyra-skills-codebase-exploration · by kwhorne

Systematically explore and understand an unfamiliar codebase - entry points, architecture, data flow, conventions, and hotspots - before changing anything. Use when the user asks how a project works, asks to onboard onto a codebase, asks "where is X handled", or before implementing in a project you haven't mapped yet.

No reviews yet
0 installs
33 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-kwhorne-elyra-skills-codebase-exploration

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-kwhorne-elyra-skills-codebase-exploration)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
3mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Codebase Exploration? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Codebase Exploration

Build an accurate mental model before touching code. Changes made on a wrong model look fine and break things.

When to use

  • "How does this project work?" / "Where is X handled?"
  • First task in a codebase you haven't mapped
  • Estimating or planning work in unfamiliar territory
  • Investigating "who calls this / what happens when…"

Principles

  • Top-down, then targeted. Skeleton first (structure, entry points), detail only where the task needs it.
  • Follow the data, not the files. Tracing one real request/command end-to-end teaches more than reading ten files alphabetically.
  • Conventions are law. The goal isn't just understanding what exists, but how things are done here — you'll be expected to imitate it.
  • Verify, don't assume. Run it, test it, log it. A model you haven't tested is a guess.

Process

1. Orient (5 minutes, breadth)

ls                                   # top-level shape
cat README.md                        # claimed purpose & setup
cat package.json composer.json pyproject.toml 2>/dev/null   # deps + scripts
git log --oneline -15                # what's being worked on now

Identify: language(s), framework, build/test commands, and what kind of thing this is (web app, library, CLI, service).

2. Find the entry points

  • Web: routes file(s), middleware stack, main controller/handler layout
  • CLI: bin/ entries, command registration
  • Service: main loop, queue consumers, scheduled jobs
  • Library: the public API surface (exports, index files)

3. Trace one real flow end-to-end

Pick one representative operation (e.g. "user submits form X") and follow it through every layer: route → validation → business logic → persistence → response. Write the chain down as you go.

4. Extract the conventions

Look at 2–3 examples of the same kind of artifact (controllers, components, tests) and note:

  • Naming and file placement patterns
  • How errors are handled, how things are tested
  • What abstractions exist (services? repositories? hooks?) and when they're used vs bypassed

5. Map the hotspots

# Most-changed files — where the action (and risk) is
git log --format= --name-only | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -15

Cross-reference with size: large and frequently changed = the file to be careful in.

6. Verify your model

  • Run the test suite — does it pass? What does it cover?
  • Make a trivial prediction ("changing this string should change that page") and confirm it
  • Note anything that contradicted your expectations — those are the landmines

Output format

## Codebase: 

**What it is:** one sentence.
**Stack:** language, framework, key deps.
**Run/test:** commands.

### Architecture
Entry points → layers → persistence (short prose or arrow diagram).

### One traced flow
: file → file → file (with one-line role each)

### Conventions to follow
- …

### Hotspots & landmines
- : why it needs care

### Open questions
- …

Anti-patterns

  • ❌ Reading files alphabetically instead of tracing a flow
  • ❌ Assuming the README is current — verify commands actually work
  • ❌ Stopping at "I found a function with the right name" without checking who calls it
  • ❌ Proposing changes that ignore the house conventions
  • ❌ Exploring everything when the task needs one subsystem — depth follows need
  • ❌ Trusting your model without one verified prediction

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.