AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified Apache-2.0 Self-run

Deepdone Review

skill-lakesoftai-deepdone-agent-skills-deepdone-review · by lakesoftai

Perform skeptical local code review focused on correctness, regressions, security, overscope, and missing tests, then record findings and residual risk. Use before final integration or handoff.

— No reviews yet
0 installs
30 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-lakesoftai-deepdone-agent-skills-deepdone-review

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
  • ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
  • ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • ✓ Untrusted network calls
  • ✓ Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • ✓ Network access No
  • ✓ Filesystem access No
  • ✓ Shell / process execution No
  • ✓ Environment & secrets No
  • ✓ Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-lakesoftai-deepdone-agent-skills-deepdone-review)

Reliability & compatibility

✓ Security review passed
0 installs to date
— no reviews yet
○ 4mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Deepdone Review? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

DeepDone Review

Purpose

Review local diff like hostile teammate who wants truth.

Primary Review Axes

  • correctness
  • regressions
  • security and permissions
  • overscoped changes
  • missing or weak tests
  • rollback pain

Severity Rubric

Use these labels:

  • block: must fix before integration. Includes correctness break, security exposure, data loss risk, broken migration, failing required check, or behavior that contradicts the milestone.
  • strong-concern: likely should fix before commit, but may need user prioritization. Includes brittle design, weak verification on risky paths, broad coupling, or hidden rollback cost.
  • nit: small local cleanup that does not change safety or correctness.

Do not inflate style issues into blockers. Do not bury real blockers as nits.

Review Behavior

  • findings first
  • severity order
  • cite exact files and lines when possible
  • no praise padding
  • if no findings, say so plainly and call out remaining test gaps or uncertainty
  • include clear fix direction for each actionable finding
  • separate product or architecture questions from code findings

Ledger Writeback

When epic ledger exists:

  • summarize accepted findings or clean review result under ## Decisions or ## Open Loops
  • include one structured line: review-result: pass|fail|blocked
  • note residual risks plainly
  • update Status if review blocks integration

Set review-result as:

  • pass: no blocking or strong unresolved findings
  • fail: review found local defects that should be fixed before commit
  • blocked: review found product, architecture, security, migration, or prioritization judgment that needs user input

Surface Checklists

Auth And Permissions

  • caller identity is verified at the correct boundary
  • authorization checks happen before data access or mutation
  • failures do not leak sensitive internal state
  • tests include allowed and denied paths

Schema And Migrations

  • migration is reversible or rollback pain is explicit
  • reads and writes work across expected old and new shapes
  • nullable, default, and backfill behavior is deliberate
  • migration ordering is safe for deploy reality

Config And Deployment

  • defaults are safe
  • secrets are not hardcoded or logged
  • environment-specific behavior is explicit
  • generated or local-only files are not included

Public API Or User-Facing Behavior

  • response shape, status code, event name, or UI state matches contract
  • error cases are covered, not only happy path
  • compatibility impact is stated
  • tests prove the user-visible acceptance condition

Shared Libraries

  • callers outside the milestone still satisfy the new contract
  • behavior changes are named in tests or docs
  • narrow fix did not become broad refactor

Workflow

  1. Read diff and recent verification results.
  2. Check whether implementation matches stated milestone.
  3. Look for behavior regressions and hidden coupling.
  4. Inspect auth, data, config, and migration surfaces with extra skepticism.
  5. Check whether tests prove intended behavior.
  6. Classify each finding by severity.
  7. Write review-result into the active ledger when one exists.
  8. Report findings first.

Output

Return:

  • findings ordered by severity
  • open questions or assumptions
  • brief integration readiness statement

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.