AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Vendor Assessment

skill-lawmotion-ai-vibe-lawyering-vendor-assessment · by LawMotion-AI

>

No reviews yet
0 installs
34 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-lawmotion-ai-vibe-lawyering-vendor-assessment

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-lawmotion-ai-vibe-lawyering-vendor-assessment)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
5mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Vendor Assessment? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

UNIVERSAL RULES (apply to every vendor task)

  • NEVER classify a sole-source supplier as low risk based on spend alone --

always assess operational dependency separately from spend volume

  • NEVER accept a vendor risk assessment that contains fabricated financial

data -- label all estimates and flag where primary data is unavailable

  • NEVER recommend a vendor exit without a qualified alternative identified

or an explicit "no alternative -- managed risk" decision documented

  • ALWAYS include specific recommended actions with deadlines in every output --

observations without actions are not acceptable

  • FOR CHINESE SUPPLIERS: ALWAYS use QCC MCP as primary data source --

Companies House and Creditsafe have NO coverage for Chinese entities

  • NEVER fabricate Chinese enterprise data -- if QCC MCP unavailable,

explicitly flag as "financial visibility: NONE" and recommend manual verification

MANDATORY OUTPUT HEADER

Every output must begin with:

TASK:          [e.g. Vendor Assessment -- Acme Corp]
VENDOR TIER:   [Strategic / Tactical / Commodity / Bottleneck / Unclassified]
CONFIGURATION: [Loaded: supply-chain.local.md / Not configured]
DATA SOURCES:  [QCC MCP / ERP / Web / Manual input]

QCC MCP INTEGRATION (Chinese Suppliers)

When to Activate QCC MCP

ALWAYS activate for Chinese suppliers (vendors with):

  • Chinese company name (e.g., "华为技术有限公司", "阿里巴巴集团")
  • Unified Social Credit Code (统一社会信用代码)
  • Registered in mainland China

QCC MCP provides official data from:

  • National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (国家企业信用信息公示系统)
  • China Judgments Online (中国裁判文书网)
  • China Execution Information (中国执行信息公开网)
  • State Taxation Administration (国家税务总局)
  • SAMR (国家市场监督管理总局)

18-Risk Categories for Supply Chain (供应链专用)

设计原则: 供应链评估聚焦"供应连续性风险",与法务合同审核的关注点不同

| Risk Category | QCC MCP Server | Supply Chain Focus | Priority | |--------------|----------------|-------------------|----------| | SUPPLY INTERRUPTION RISKS |||| | Judicial Execution | Risk Control | 直接影响生产资金链 | 🔴 CRITICAL | | - Dishonest (失信) | | 信用崩溃,履约能力丧失 | | | - Executed person (被执行人) | | 现金流危机,影响原材料采购 | | | - Limit high consumption (限高) | | 法人受限,商务活动受阻 | | | - Final case (终本案件) | | 历史债务累积,财务恶化 | | | - Judicial auction (司法拍卖) | | 核心资产被拍卖,产能受损 | | | Bankruptcy Liquidation | Risk Control | 供应关系终止 | 🔴 CRITICAL | | - Bankruptcy reorganization (破产重整) | | 需立即切换供应商 | | | OPERATIONAL CONTINUITY RISKS |||| | Operational Abnormal | Enterprise Base | 经营稳定性 | 🔴 HIGH | | - Abnormal operation (经营异常) | | 工商监管介入,经营不稳定 | | | - Serious violation (严重违法) | | 可能被吊销执照,供应中断 | | | - Cancellation filing (注销备案) | | 主动终止经营,供应中断 | | | Environmental Penalty | Risk Control | 可能导致停产 | 🟡 MEDIUM | | - Environmental penalty (环保处罚) | | 责令停产整改,影响交付 | | | FINANCIAL HEALTH RISKS |||| | Property Restricted | Enterprise Base | 财务稳定性指标 | 🟡 MEDIUM | | - Equity freeze (股权冻结) | | 股东纠纷,控制权不稳定 | | | - Equity pledge (股权出质) | | 融资压力,流动性风险 | | | - Chattel mortgage (动产抵押) | | 设备抵押,影响产能扩张 | | | Tax Violation | Risk Control | 现金流与合规 | 🟡 MEDIUM | | - Tax arrears (欠税公告) | | 现金流危机,可能拖欠货款 | | | - Abnormal tax (非正常户) | | 税务合规严重问题 | | | Administrative Penalty | Risk Control | 行业合规 | 🔵 LOW | | - Administrative penalty (行政处罚) | | 一般合规问题 | |

Supply Chain Specific Dimensions (供应链特有维度)

Beyond the 18 core risks, supply chain assessment MUST evaluate:

DIMENSION 7: CAPACITY & QUALIFICATION (产能与资质)

QCC MCP Server: Operation + Company

  • Business Qualifications (资质证书):
  • Industry-specific licenses (生产许可证、经营许可证)
  • Quality certifications (ISO 9001, IATF 16949, etc.)
  • Sector permits (医疗器械、食品生产、危险品等)
  • Flags: RED - Required license expired or not held
  • Administrative Licenses (行政许可):
  • Current validity of operating permits
  • Renewal status and timeline
  • Flags: AMBER - License expiring within 90 days
  • Bidding Activity (招投标活跃度):
  • Recent bidding participation (indicator of business health)
  • Win/loss ratio trends
  • Flags: AMBER - Significant decline in bidding activity (>50% YoY)
DIMENSION 8: ORGANIZATIONAL STABILITY (组织稳定性)

QCC MCP Server: Company

  • Shareholder Structure (股权结构):
  • Major shareholder changes (indicator of control instability)
  • State-owned vs. private (policy risk assessment)
  • Flags: RED - Major shareholder change within 6 months
  • Change Records (变更记录):
  • Frequent legal representative changes
  • Registered address changes (relocation risk)
  • Business scope changes (strategy shift)
  • Flags: AMBER - >3 material changes within 12 months
  • Branch Network (分支机构):
  • Geographic distribution of production facilities
  • Single-site vs. multi-site (business continuity)
  • Flags: AMBER - Single production site with no backup
DIMENSION 9: BUSINESS HEALTH (业务健康度)

QCC MCP Server: Operation

  • Official Credit Rating (官方信用评价):
  • Government credit ratings (A级、B级等)
  • Tax credit rating (A级纳税人)
  • Flags: RED - Rating below B级
  • Spot Check Records (抽查检查记录):
  • Regulatory inspection results
  • Product quality spot checks
  • Flags: RED - Failed inspection with corrective action pending
  • News Sentiment (新闻舆情):
  • Negative news coverage (supply chain disruptions, labor issues)
  • Industry-specific concerns
  • Flags: AMBER - Negative sentiment spike (>3 negative articles in 30 days)

ASSESSMENT WORKFLOW

Phase 1: Vendor Classification (Kraljic Matrix)

Before any assessment, classify the vendor:

| Question | Strategic | Tactical | Commodity | Bottleneck | | --------------------------- | ------------- | ----------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Are alternatives available? | No / very few | Yes -- 2-3 | Many | No / very few | | Annual spend? | High | Medium | Any | Low-Medium | | Impact if vendor fails? | Critical | Significant | Manageable | Critical | | Relationship depth? | Deep / long | Established | Transactional | Variable |

STRATEGIC (Tier 1): High spend AND high dependency. Single-source or near-sole-source. Review: quarterly + event-triggered. TACTICAL (Tier 2): Significant spend. Multiple alternatives available. Review: bi-annual + event-triggered. COMMODITY (Tier 3): Standard goods/services. Easy to switch. Review: annual. BOTTLENECK (Tier 4): LOW spend but HIGH dependency. MOST DANGEROUS -- most often neglected. Review: quarterly despite low spend.

CLASSIFICATION RULE: When assessing a vendor with low spend but sole-source dependency, ALWAYS classify as BOTTLENECK and flag as high-risk regardless of spend volume.

Phase 2: Six-Dimension Assessment

DIMENSION 1: COMMERCIAL

Contract status:

  • Active contract: Yes/No; expiry date; auto-renewal clause?
  • Notice period for non-renewal: documented?
  • Pricing model: fixed / index-linked / open book / variable
  • Payment terms: standard for sector/market?
  • Volume commitments: minimum order quantities; penalty clauses?
  • IP ownership: critical for manufactured-to-spec components

Flags:

  • RED: No contract for spend > configured threshold
  • RED: Auto-renewal without documented notice window reminder
  • AMBER: Fixed price contract on commodity category (index exposure)
  • AMBER: Volume commitment with penalty below minimum forecast volume
DIMENSION 2: OPERATIONAL

Metrics from ERP (last 12 months):

  • On-time delivery rate (OTD): calculate from GR dates vs. PO delivery dates
  • Average lead time and variance (consistency matters as much as average)
  • Quality rejection rate (from QMS or goods inward records)
  • Capacity: can they scale with our growth? (ask directly)
  • Business continuity: single site or multiple?

For Chinese suppliers: Check operational risk signals via QCC MCP:

  • Abnormal operation status (经营异常)
  • Administrative penalties (行政处罚)
  • Environmental penalties (环保处罚)

Flags:

  • RED: OTD configured threshold (e.g. >2% for direct materials)
  • RED: Abnormal operation status detected (QCC MCP)
  • AMBER: OTD declining trend (even if above threshold -- trajectory matters)
  • AMBER: Single production site with no documented BCP
DIMENSION 3: FINANCIAL

For Chinese suppliers (QCC MCP):

  • Property Restrictions (RED FLAGS):
  • Equity freeze (股权冻结): Indicates judicial disputes
  • Equity pledge (股权出质): Financing pressure signal
  • Chattel mortgage (动产抵押): Working capital pressure
  • Tax Status (RED FLAGS):
  • Tax arrears announcements (欠税公告)
  • Abnormal tax status (税务非正常户)
  • Tax violations (税收违法)
  • Bankruptcy/Liquidation (RED FLAGS):
  • Bankruptcy reorganization proceedings (破产重整)
  • Liquidation information (清算信息)
  • Financial Data Availability:
  • Non-listed companies: Limited financial visibility
  • For Strategic/Bottleneck vendors: Request audited financial statements annually

Financial Risk Assessment (QCC MCP Enhanced):

| Indicator | Data Source | Risk Signal | |-----------|-------------|-------------| | Equity freeze | QCC MCP Enterprise | RED - Judicial dispute | | Equity pledge | QCC MCP Enterprise | AMBER - Financing need | | Tax arrears | QCC MCP Risk Control | RED - Cash flow crisis | | Abnormal tax | QCC MCP Risk Control | RED - Non-compliant | | Bankruptcy | QCC MCP Risk Control | RED - Insolvency |

Flags:

  • RED: Equity freeze active
  • RED: Tax arrears or abnormal tax status
  • RED: Bankruptcy/liquidation proceedings
  • RED: Zero financial visibility on Strategic or Bottleneck vendor
  • AMBER: Equity pledge registered (check if multiple)
  • AMBER: Chattel mortgage (assess scale vs. business size)
DIMENSION 4: COMPLIANCE

Certifications required (configure by category in local settings):

  • Quality: ISO 9001 / sector-specific (IATF 16949 for automotive, etc.)
  • Environmental: ISO 14001 (if required by your policy)
  • Data: GDPR compliance + DPA for any data-sharing arrangement
  • Modern Slavery Act statement (UK vendors > GBP 36M turnover)
  • Sanctions screening: verified against OFAC, EU, UK HMT lists
  • Trade compliance: export licences, import documentation
  • ESG/ethical sourcing: modern slavery, conflict minerals (sector-specific)

For Chinese suppliers - QCC MCP Enhanced:

  • Administrative Penalties: Check via QCC MCP Risk Control
  • Environmental Penalties: Check via QCC MCP Risk Control
  • Serious Violations: Check via QCC MCP Enterprise Base (严重违法)

Flags:

  • RED: Active sanctions match -- immediate escalation; stop all activity
  • RED: Required certification expired with no renewal in progress
  • RED: Serious violation record (严重违法)
  • AMBER: Certification expiring within 90 days -- request renewal evidence
  • AMBER: Administrative/environmental penalty within 12 months
DIMENSION 5: STRATEGIC
  • Dependency: sole-source / dual-source / approved panel
  • Switching timeline: how long to qualify and onboard an alternative?
  • Switching cost: tooling, qualification, ramp-up period
  • Relationship investment: what have we and they invested?
  • Innovation: are they bringing improvements and ideas?
  • Strategic alignment: do their long-term plans align with ours?

For Chinese suppliers:

  • Check equity structure changes (investment/exit signals)
  • Monitor major shareholder changes via QCC MCP Enterprise

Flags:

  • RED: Sole-source with switching timeline >6 months and no backup qualified
  • AMBER: No alternative vendor qualified or in qualification for critical category
  • AMBER: Vendor has indicated desire to exit the relationship or market segment
DIMENSION 6: GEOPOLITICAL / SUSTAINABILITY
  • Country risk: political stability; trade restriction risk; sanctions exposure
  • Currency risk: contract currency vs. payment currency
  • Supply chain depth: do we know Tier 2 sub-suppliers for critical components?
  • Carbon footprint and Scope 3 reporting (increasingly mandatory)
  • Ethical sourcing: conflict minerals, child labour risk by geography
  • Single-geography concentration: are all suppliers for this category in the same country or region?

For Chinese suppliers:

  • Consider China-specific risks: policy changes, trade restrictions
  • Check if supplier is in restricted entity list (QCC MCP can cross-reference)

Flags:

  • RED: Vendor in sanctioned country or subject to active export restrictions
  • RED: Entity list / restricted party match
  • AMBER: All suppliers for a critical category in a single high-risk geography
  • AMBER: No Tier 2 supplier mapping for Strategic vendors

QCC MCP ASSESSMENT OUTPUT FORMAT

VENDOR ASSESSMENT: [Vendor Name]
================================================================
Classification:  [STRATEGIC / TACTICAL / COMMODITY / BOTTLENECK]
Tier:            [1 / 2 / 3 / 4]
Rationale:       [Brief justification for classification]

-- ENTITY VERIFICATION (QCC MCP) ---------------------------------
Entity Status:    [Verified / Not Found / Multiple Matches]
Credit Code:      [Unified Social Credit Code]
Legal Status:     [存续/在业/注销/吊销/etc.]
Legal Person:     [Name]
Registered Cap:   [Amount]
Verification:     [实体锚定确认信息]

-- COMMERCIAL ----------------------------------------------------
[Findings and flags per item above]

-- OPERATIONAL ---------------------------------------------------
OTD (12M):     [X]%   Threshold: [X]%   Status: [PASS / WARNING / FAIL]
Lead time avg: [X] days  Variance: +/-[X] days
Quality rej:   [X]%   Threshold: [X]%   Status: [PASS / WARNING / FAIL]

QCC MCP Signals:
  - Abnormal Operation: [Yes - details / No]
  - Administrative Penalties: [Count and details]
  - Environmental Penalties: [Count and details]

-- FINANCIAL (QCC MCP Enhanced) ----------------------------------
Property Restrictions:
  - Equity Freeze:    [Yes - amount/date / No]
  - Equity Pledge:    [Yes - amount/creditor / No]
  - Chattel Mortgage: [Yes - amount/scope / No]

Tax Status:
  - Tax Arrears:      [Yes - amount/type / No]
  - Abnormal Tax:     [Yes - date/office / No]
  - Tax Violations:   [Count]

Bankruptcy/Liquidation:
  - Bankruptcy:       [Yes - type/status / No]
  - Liquidation:      [Yes / No]

Financial Visibility: [Available / Limited / None]
Data Source: QCC MCP (official SAMR/National Tax sources)

-- COMPLIANCE ----------------------------------------------------
Certifications: [Status]
QCC MCP Compliance Check:
  - Administrative Penalties: [Count and details]
  - Environmental Penalties: [Count and details]
  - Serious Violations: [Yes/No - details]
Sanctions:      [Clear / Flagged - details]

-- STRATEGIC -----------------------------------------------------
[Dependency level; switching timeline; backup vendor status]

-- GEOPOLITICAL / SUSTAINABILITY ---------------------------------
[Country risk; currency; Tier 2 visibility; ESG]

RISK SUMMARY
RED CRITICAL: [list]
AMBER MODERATE: [list]
GREEN LOW: [list]

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS -- RANKED BY URGENCY
[N]. [Priority] [Action] -- [Owner] -- by [Date]

QCC MCP ASSESSMENT TRACE
Data Sources: 企查查MCP-企业基座, 企查查MCP-风控大脑
Assessment Time: [Timestamp]
Next QCC MCP Refresh: [Date + 90 days recommended]
================================================================

NEVER DO THESE

  • NEVER classify a sole-source supplier as low-risk because spend is low
  • NEVER complete a financial assessment with fabricated data --

if data unavailable: flag explicitly as "financial visibility: NONE" and recommend requesting audited accounts

  • NEVER conduct a sanctions screening check manually --

always use an authoritative list (OFAC, EU, UK HMT)

  • NEVER close an assessment without a recommended action list
  • NEVER skip the Tier 2 visibility check for Strategic vendors
  • NEVER use Companies House or Creditsafe for Chinese suppliers --

these sources have ZERO coverage for Chinese entities

  • NEVER fabricate QCC MCP data -- if MCP unavailable,

flag as "QCC MCP: NOT CONFIGURED" and use manual verification

ALL OUTPUTS REQUIRE REVIEW BY A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL BEFORE USE IN BUSINESS DECISIONS.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.