Install
$ agentstack add skill-lawmotion-ai-vibe-lawyering-vendor-assessment ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
UNIVERSAL RULES (apply to every vendor task)
- NEVER classify a sole-source supplier as low risk based on spend alone --
always assess operational dependency separately from spend volume
- NEVER accept a vendor risk assessment that contains fabricated financial
data -- label all estimates and flag where primary data is unavailable
- NEVER recommend a vendor exit without a qualified alternative identified
or an explicit "no alternative -- managed risk" decision documented
- ALWAYS include specific recommended actions with deadlines in every output --
observations without actions are not acceptable
- FOR CHINESE SUPPLIERS: ALWAYS use QCC MCP as primary data source --
Companies House and Creditsafe have NO coverage for Chinese entities
- NEVER fabricate Chinese enterprise data -- if QCC MCP unavailable,
explicitly flag as "financial visibility: NONE" and recommend manual verification
MANDATORY OUTPUT HEADER
Every output must begin with:
TASK: [e.g. Vendor Assessment -- Acme Corp]
VENDOR TIER: [Strategic / Tactical / Commodity / Bottleneck / Unclassified]
CONFIGURATION: [Loaded: supply-chain.local.md / Not configured]
DATA SOURCES: [QCC MCP / ERP / Web / Manual input]
QCC MCP INTEGRATION (Chinese Suppliers)
When to Activate QCC MCP
ALWAYS activate for Chinese suppliers (vendors with):
- Chinese company name (e.g., "华为技术有限公司", "阿里巴巴集团")
- Unified Social Credit Code (统一社会信用代码)
- Registered in mainland China
QCC MCP provides official data from:
- National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (国家企业信用信息公示系统)
- China Judgments Online (中国裁判文书网)
- China Execution Information (中国执行信息公开网)
- State Taxation Administration (国家税务总局)
- SAMR (国家市场监督管理总局)
18-Risk Categories for Supply Chain (供应链专用)
设计原则: 供应链评估聚焦"供应连续性风险",与法务合同审核的关注点不同
| Risk Category | QCC MCP Server | Supply Chain Focus | Priority | |--------------|----------------|-------------------|----------| | SUPPLY INTERRUPTION RISKS |||| | Judicial Execution | Risk Control | 直接影响生产资金链 | 🔴 CRITICAL | | - Dishonest (失信) | | 信用崩溃,履约能力丧失 | | | - Executed person (被执行人) | | 现金流危机,影响原材料采购 | | | - Limit high consumption (限高) | | 法人受限,商务活动受阻 | | | - Final case (终本案件) | | 历史债务累积,财务恶化 | | | - Judicial auction (司法拍卖) | | 核心资产被拍卖,产能受损 | | | Bankruptcy Liquidation | Risk Control | 供应关系终止 | 🔴 CRITICAL | | - Bankruptcy reorganization (破产重整) | | 需立即切换供应商 | | | OPERATIONAL CONTINUITY RISKS |||| | Operational Abnormal | Enterprise Base | 经营稳定性 | 🔴 HIGH | | - Abnormal operation (经营异常) | | 工商监管介入,经营不稳定 | | | - Serious violation (严重违法) | | 可能被吊销执照,供应中断 | | | - Cancellation filing (注销备案) | | 主动终止经营,供应中断 | | | Environmental Penalty | Risk Control | 可能导致停产 | 🟡 MEDIUM | | - Environmental penalty (环保处罚) | | 责令停产整改,影响交付 | | | FINANCIAL HEALTH RISKS |||| | Property Restricted | Enterprise Base | 财务稳定性指标 | 🟡 MEDIUM | | - Equity freeze (股权冻结) | | 股东纠纷,控制权不稳定 | | | - Equity pledge (股权出质) | | 融资压力,流动性风险 | | | - Chattel mortgage (动产抵押) | | 设备抵押,影响产能扩张 | | | Tax Violation | Risk Control | 现金流与合规 | 🟡 MEDIUM | | - Tax arrears (欠税公告) | | 现金流危机,可能拖欠货款 | | | - Abnormal tax (非正常户) | | 税务合规严重问题 | | | Administrative Penalty | Risk Control | 行业合规 | 🔵 LOW | | - Administrative penalty (行政处罚) | | 一般合规问题 | |
Supply Chain Specific Dimensions (供应链特有维度)
Beyond the 18 core risks, supply chain assessment MUST evaluate:
DIMENSION 7: CAPACITY & QUALIFICATION (产能与资质)
QCC MCP Server: Operation + Company
- Business Qualifications (资质证书):
- Industry-specific licenses (生产许可证、经营许可证)
- Quality certifications (ISO 9001, IATF 16949, etc.)
- Sector permits (医疗器械、食品生产、危险品等)
- Flags: RED - Required license expired or not held
- Administrative Licenses (行政许可):
- Current validity of operating permits
- Renewal status and timeline
- Flags: AMBER - License expiring within 90 days
- Bidding Activity (招投标活跃度):
- Recent bidding participation (indicator of business health)
- Win/loss ratio trends
- Flags: AMBER - Significant decline in bidding activity (>50% YoY)
DIMENSION 8: ORGANIZATIONAL STABILITY (组织稳定性)
QCC MCP Server: Company
- Shareholder Structure (股权结构):
- Major shareholder changes (indicator of control instability)
- State-owned vs. private (policy risk assessment)
- Flags: RED - Major shareholder change within 6 months
- Change Records (变更记录):
- Frequent legal representative changes
- Registered address changes (relocation risk)
- Business scope changes (strategy shift)
- Flags: AMBER - >3 material changes within 12 months
- Branch Network (分支机构):
- Geographic distribution of production facilities
- Single-site vs. multi-site (business continuity)
- Flags: AMBER - Single production site with no backup
DIMENSION 9: BUSINESS HEALTH (业务健康度)
QCC MCP Server: Operation
- Official Credit Rating (官方信用评价):
- Government credit ratings (A级、B级等)
- Tax credit rating (A级纳税人)
- Flags: RED - Rating below B级
- Spot Check Records (抽查检查记录):
- Regulatory inspection results
- Product quality spot checks
- Flags: RED - Failed inspection with corrective action pending
- News Sentiment (新闻舆情):
- Negative news coverage (supply chain disruptions, labor issues)
- Industry-specific concerns
- Flags: AMBER - Negative sentiment spike (>3 negative articles in 30 days)
ASSESSMENT WORKFLOW
Phase 1: Vendor Classification (Kraljic Matrix)
Before any assessment, classify the vendor:
| Question | Strategic | Tactical | Commodity | Bottleneck | | --------------------------- | ------------- | ----------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Are alternatives available? | No / very few | Yes -- 2-3 | Many | No / very few | | Annual spend? | High | Medium | Any | Low-Medium | | Impact if vendor fails? | Critical | Significant | Manageable | Critical | | Relationship depth? | Deep / long | Established | Transactional | Variable |
STRATEGIC (Tier 1): High spend AND high dependency. Single-source or near-sole-source. Review: quarterly + event-triggered. TACTICAL (Tier 2): Significant spend. Multiple alternatives available. Review: bi-annual + event-triggered. COMMODITY (Tier 3): Standard goods/services. Easy to switch. Review: annual. BOTTLENECK (Tier 4): LOW spend but HIGH dependency. MOST DANGEROUS -- most often neglected. Review: quarterly despite low spend.
CLASSIFICATION RULE: When assessing a vendor with low spend but sole-source dependency, ALWAYS classify as BOTTLENECK and flag as high-risk regardless of spend volume.
Phase 2: Six-Dimension Assessment
DIMENSION 1: COMMERCIAL
Contract status:
- Active contract: Yes/No; expiry date; auto-renewal clause?
- Notice period for non-renewal: documented?
- Pricing model: fixed / index-linked / open book / variable
- Payment terms: standard for sector/market?
- Volume commitments: minimum order quantities; penalty clauses?
- IP ownership: critical for manufactured-to-spec components
Flags:
- RED: No contract for spend > configured threshold
- RED: Auto-renewal without documented notice window reminder
- AMBER: Fixed price contract on commodity category (index exposure)
- AMBER: Volume commitment with penalty below minimum forecast volume
DIMENSION 2: OPERATIONAL
Metrics from ERP (last 12 months):
- On-time delivery rate (OTD): calculate from GR dates vs. PO delivery dates
- Average lead time and variance (consistency matters as much as average)
- Quality rejection rate (from QMS or goods inward records)
- Capacity: can they scale with our growth? (ask directly)
- Business continuity: single site or multiple?
For Chinese suppliers: Check operational risk signals via QCC MCP:
- Abnormal operation status (经营异常)
- Administrative penalties (行政处罚)
- Environmental penalties (环保处罚)
Flags:
- RED: OTD configured threshold (e.g. >2% for direct materials)
- RED: Abnormal operation status detected (QCC MCP)
- AMBER: OTD declining trend (even if above threshold -- trajectory matters)
- AMBER: Single production site with no documented BCP
DIMENSION 3: FINANCIAL
For Chinese suppliers (QCC MCP):
- Property Restrictions (RED FLAGS):
- Equity freeze (股权冻结): Indicates judicial disputes
- Equity pledge (股权出质): Financing pressure signal
- Chattel mortgage (动产抵押): Working capital pressure
- Tax Status (RED FLAGS):
- Tax arrears announcements (欠税公告)
- Abnormal tax status (税务非正常户)
- Tax violations (税收违法)
- Bankruptcy/Liquidation (RED FLAGS):
- Bankruptcy reorganization proceedings (破产重整)
- Liquidation information (清算信息)
- Financial Data Availability:
- Non-listed companies: Limited financial visibility
- For Strategic/Bottleneck vendors: Request audited financial statements annually
Financial Risk Assessment (QCC MCP Enhanced):
| Indicator | Data Source | Risk Signal | |-----------|-------------|-------------| | Equity freeze | QCC MCP Enterprise | RED - Judicial dispute | | Equity pledge | QCC MCP Enterprise | AMBER - Financing need | | Tax arrears | QCC MCP Risk Control | RED - Cash flow crisis | | Abnormal tax | QCC MCP Risk Control | RED - Non-compliant | | Bankruptcy | QCC MCP Risk Control | RED - Insolvency |
Flags:
- RED: Equity freeze active
- RED: Tax arrears or abnormal tax status
- RED: Bankruptcy/liquidation proceedings
- RED: Zero financial visibility on Strategic or Bottleneck vendor
- AMBER: Equity pledge registered (check if multiple)
- AMBER: Chattel mortgage (assess scale vs. business size)
DIMENSION 4: COMPLIANCE
Certifications required (configure by category in local settings):
- Quality: ISO 9001 / sector-specific (IATF 16949 for automotive, etc.)
- Environmental: ISO 14001 (if required by your policy)
- Data: GDPR compliance + DPA for any data-sharing arrangement
- Modern Slavery Act statement (UK vendors > GBP 36M turnover)
- Sanctions screening: verified against OFAC, EU, UK HMT lists
- Trade compliance: export licences, import documentation
- ESG/ethical sourcing: modern slavery, conflict minerals (sector-specific)
For Chinese suppliers - QCC MCP Enhanced:
- Administrative Penalties: Check via QCC MCP Risk Control
- Environmental Penalties: Check via QCC MCP Risk Control
- Serious Violations: Check via QCC MCP Enterprise Base (严重违法)
Flags:
- RED: Active sanctions match -- immediate escalation; stop all activity
- RED: Required certification expired with no renewal in progress
- RED: Serious violation record (严重违法)
- AMBER: Certification expiring within 90 days -- request renewal evidence
- AMBER: Administrative/environmental penalty within 12 months
DIMENSION 5: STRATEGIC
- Dependency: sole-source / dual-source / approved panel
- Switching timeline: how long to qualify and onboard an alternative?
- Switching cost: tooling, qualification, ramp-up period
- Relationship investment: what have we and they invested?
- Innovation: are they bringing improvements and ideas?
- Strategic alignment: do their long-term plans align with ours?
For Chinese suppliers:
- Check equity structure changes (investment/exit signals)
- Monitor major shareholder changes via QCC MCP Enterprise
Flags:
- RED: Sole-source with switching timeline >6 months and no backup qualified
- AMBER: No alternative vendor qualified or in qualification for critical category
- AMBER: Vendor has indicated desire to exit the relationship or market segment
DIMENSION 6: GEOPOLITICAL / SUSTAINABILITY
- Country risk: political stability; trade restriction risk; sanctions exposure
- Currency risk: contract currency vs. payment currency
- Supply chain depth: do we know Tier 2 sub-suppliers for critical components?
- Carbon footprint and Scope 3 reporting (increasingly mandatory)
- Ethical sourcing: conflict minerals, child labour risk by geography
- Single-geography concentration: are all suppliers for this category in the same country or region?
For Chinese suppliers:
- Consider China-specific risks: policy changes, trade restrictions
- Check if supplier is in restricted entity list (QCC MCP can cross-reference)
Flags:
- RED: Vendor in sanctioned country or subject to active export restrictions
- RED: Entity list / restricted party match
- AMBER: All suppliers for a critical category in a single high-risk geography
- AMBER: No Tier 2 supplier mapping for Strategic vendors
QCC MCP ASSESSMENT OUTPUT FORMAT
VENDOR ASSESSMENT: [Vendor Name]
================================================================
Classification: [STRATEGIC / TACTICAL / COMMODITY / BOTTLENECK]
Tier: [1 / 2 / 3 / 4]
Rationale: [Brief justification for classification]
-- ENTITY VERIFICATION (QCC MCP) ---------------------------------
Entity Status: [Verified / Not Found / Multiple Matches]
Credit Code: [Unified Social Credit Code]
Legal Status: [存续/在业/注销/吊销/etc.]
Legal Person: [Name]
Registered Cap: [Amount]
Verification: [实体锚定确认信息]
-- COMMERCIAL ----------------------------------------------------
[Findings and flags per item above]
-- OPERATIONAL ---------------------------------------------------
OTD (12M): [X]% Threshold: [X]% Status: [PASS / WARNING / FAIL]
Lead time avg: [X] days Variance: +/-[X] days
Quality rej: [X]% Threshold: [X]% Status: [PASS / WARNING / FAIL]
QCC MCP Signals:
- Abnormal Operation: [Yes - details / No]
- Administrative Penalties: [Count and details]
- Environmental Penalties: [Count and details]
-- FINANCIAL (QCC MCP Enhanced) ----------------------------------
Property Restrictions:
- Equity Freeze: [Yes - amount/date / No]
- Equity Pledge: [Yes - amount/creditor / No]
- Chattel Mortgage: [Yes - amount/scope / No]
Tax Status:
- Tax Arrears: [Yes - amount/type / No]
- Abnormal Tax: [Yes - date/office / No]
- Tax Violations: [Count]
Bankruptcy/Liquidation:
- Bankruptcy: [Yes - type/status / No]
- Liquidation: [Yes / No]
Financial Visibility: [Available / Limited / None]
Data Source: QCC MCP (official SAMR/National Tax sources)
-- COMPLIANCE ----------------------------------------------------
Certifications: [Status]
QCC MCP Compliance Check:
- Administrative Penalties: [Count and details]
- Environmental Penalties: [Count and details]
- Serious Violations: [Yes/No - details]
Sanctions: [Clear / Flagged - details]
-- STRATEGIC -----------------------------------------------------
[Dependency level; switching timeline; backup vendor status]
-- GEOPOLITICAL / SUSTAINABILITY ---------------------------------
[Country risk; currency; Tier 2 visibility; ESG]
RISK SUMMARY
RED CRITICAL: [list]
AMBER MODERATE: [list]
GREEN LOW: [list]
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS -- RANKED BY URGENCY
[N]. [Priority] [Action] -- [Owner] -- by [Date]
QCC MCP ASSESSMENT TRACE
Data Sources: 企查查MCP-企业基座, 企查查MCP-风控大脑
Assessment Time: [Timestamp]
Next QCC MCP Refresh: [Date + 90 days recommended]
================================================================
NEVER DO THESE
- NEVER classify a sole-source supplier as low-risk because spend is low
- NEVER complete a financial assessment with fabricated data --
if data unavailable: flag explicitly as "financial visibility: NONE" and recommend requesting audited accounts
- NEVER conduct a sanctions screening check manually --
always use an authoritative list (OFAC, EU, UK HMT)
- NEVER close an assessment without a recommended action list
- NEVER skip the Tier 2 visibility check for Strategic vendors
- NEVER use Companies House or Creditsafe for Chinese suppliers --
these sources have ZERO coverage for Chinese entities
- NEVER fabricate QCC MCP data -- if MCP unavailable,
flag as "QCC MCP: NOT CONFIGURED" and use manual verification
ALL OUTPUTS REQUIRE REVIEW BY A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL BEFORE USE IN BUSINESS DECISIONS.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: LawMotion-AI
- Source: LawMotion-AI/Vibe-Lawyering
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.