Ring:cleaning Comments

Cleaning Comments

When to use

• Code has excessive, redundant, or obvious comments
• During code review or post-refactor cleanup
• Before committing to clean up comment noise in changed files
• Codebase has accumulated commented-out code blocks

Skip when

• Reviewing documentation files (README, docs/, etc.)
• Comments are already minimal and meaningful
• Working with generated code or third-party files

Sequence

Runs after: ring:exploring-codebases (optional, for architecture context)

Related

Complementary: ring:exploring-codebases — run first for architecture-aware cleaning that preserves critical documentation

---

Analyze comments in code and remove those that violate clean code principles while preserving valuable ones. You can focus on git changes for faster, more relevant cleaning, or analyze the entire codebase.

Recommended workflow: Run ring:exploring-codebases first to understand the architecture, then clean comments with that context. This preserves architectural documentation, understands which comments are critical for complex modules, and respects project-specific documentation standards.

Clean Code Comment Rules

1. Always try to explain yourself in code — Remove comments that can be replaced with better function/variable names
2. Don't be redundant — Remove comments that just repeat what the code obviously does
3. Don't add obvious noise — Remove comments like i++; // increment i
4. Don't use closing brace comments — Remove } // end of if block style comments
5. Don't comment out code — Remove commented-out code blocks
6. Keep explanation of intent — Preserve comments explaining WHY, not WHAT
7. Keep warnings of consequences — Preserve comments about important side effects
8. Keep legal and informative comments — Preserve copyright, licenses, TODOs

Examples

Before:

// Check if user is eligible for discount
if (user.age >= 65 && user.membershipYears >= 5) {
  // Apply senior discount
  total = total * 0.9 // multiply by 0.9 to get 10% discount
} // end if block

After:

if (user.isEligibleForSeniorDiscount()) {
  total = total * SENIOR_DISCOUNT_RATE
}

Process

Phase 0: Git Scope Filtering (when git options used)

If git-scope is specified, determine files in scope:

| Scope | Git command | |-------|------------| | staged | git diff --cached --name-only --diff-filter=ACMR | | unstaged | git diff --name-only --diff-filter=ACMR | | all-changes | git diff HEAD --name-only --diff-filter=ACMR | | last-commit | git diff HEAD~1..HEAD --name-only --diff-filter=ACMR | | branch | git diff $(git merge-base HEAD main)..HEAD --name-only --diff-filter=ACMR | | commit-range= | git diff --name-only --diff-filter=ACMR |

If file-pattern is also specified, filter the git results to match. Show git statistics: scope name, file count, and first 10 filenames.

Phase 1: Architecture-Aware Analysis

1. Understand Codebase Context

• Identify key architectural patterns and conventions
• Map critical system components and their responsibilities
• Understand established documentation patterns
• Identify complex modules requiring careful comment preservation

Phase 2: Targeted Comment Analysis

1. Scan Files

• Find all files matching the pattern (or entire codebase if no pattern specified)
• Prioritize files with most comment issues (using codebase analysis)
• Identify different types of comments in context of project patterns
• Categorize by clean code rules while respecting architecture

Phase 3: Context-Aware Cleaning

1. Clean Bad Comments

• Remove redundant comments that repeat code
• Remove obvious noise comments
• Remove closing brace comments
• Remove commented-out code blocks
• Preserve architectural explanations identified in Phase 1

1. Preserve Good Comments

• Keep intent explanations and clarifications
• Keep consequence warnings
• Keep legal/copyright notices
• Keep TODO comments
• Keep system design documentation critical to understanding
• Keep pattern explanations that help maintain conventions

1. Suggest Code Improvements

• Identify where comments can be replaced with better naming
• Suggest function extractions for complex logic
• Recommend architectural improvements based on codebase analysis

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

• Author: LerianStudio
• Source: LerianStudio/ring
• License: Apache-2.0
• Homepage: https://lerian.studio

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.