AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified Apache-2.0 Self-run

Ring:executing Plans

skill-lerianstudio-ring-executing-plans · by LerianStudio

|

No reviews yet
0 installs
38 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-lerianstudio-ring-executing-plans

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-lerianstudio-ring-executing-plans)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Ring:executing Plans? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Executing Plans

Overview

Load plan, review critically, choose execution mode, execute tasks with code review.

Core principle: User chooses between autonomous execution or batch execution with human review checkpoints.

Two execution modes:

  • One-go (autonomous): Execute all batches continuously with code review, report only at completion
  • Batch (with review): Execute one batch, code review, pause for human feedback, repeat

Announce at start: "I'm using the ring:executing-plans skill to implement this plan."

The Process

Step 1: Load and Review Plan

  1. Read plan file
  2. Review critically - identify any questions or concerns about the plan
  3. If concerns: Raise them with your human partner before starting
  4. If no concerns: Create TodoWrite and proceed to Step 2

Step 2: Choose Execution Mode (MANDATORY)

⚠️ THIS STEP IS NON-NEGOTIABLE. You MUST use AskUserQuestion before executing ANY tasks.

Ask: "How would you like to execute this plan?" Options: (1) One-go (autonomous) - all batches with code review, no human review until completion (2) Batch (with review) - pause for human review after each batch

Based on response: One-go → Steps 3-4 loop until done | Batch → Steps 3-5 loop

Why AskUserQuestion is Mandatory (Not "Contextual Guidance")

This is a structural checkpoint, not optional UX polish.

User saying "don't wait", "don't ask questions", or "just execute" does NOT skip this step because:

  1. Execution mode affects architecture - One-go vs batch determines review checkpoints, error recovery paths, and rollback points
  2. Implicit intent ≠ explicit choice - "Don't wait" might mean "use one-go" OR "ask quickly and proceed"
  3. AskUserQuestion takes 3 seconds - It's not an interruption, it's a confirmation
  4. Emergency pressure is exactly when mistakes happen - Structural gates exist FOR high-pressure moments

Common Rationalizations That Mean You're About to Violate This Rule:

| Rationalization | Reality | |-----------------|---------| | "User intent is crystal clear" | Intent is not the same as explicit selection. Ask anyway. | | "This is contextual guidance, not absolute law" | Wrong. It says MANDATORY. That means mandatory. | | "Asking would violate their 'don't ask' instruction" | AskUserQuestion is a 3-second structural gate, not a conversation. | | "Skills are tools, not bureaucratic checklists" | This skill IS the checklist. Follow it. | | "Interpreting spirit over letter" | The spirit IS the letter. Use AskUserQuestion. | | "User already chose by saying 'just execute'" | Verbal shorthand ≠ structured mode selection. Ask. |

If you catch yourself thinking any of these → STOP → Use AskUserQuestion anyway.

Step 2.5: Context Switching for Multi-Module Plans

If plan has tasks with target: and working_directory: fields:

  1. Track current module:

`` current_module = None current_directory = "." ``

  1. Before each task, check for context switch:

``` IF task.target != currentmodule AND currentmodule != None: # Prompt user for confirmation AskUserQuestion: question: "Switching to {task.target} module at {task.working_directory}. Continue?" header: "Context" options:

  • label: "Continue"

description: "Switch to {task.target} and execute task"

  • label: "Skip task"

description: "Skip this task and continue with next"

  • label: "Stop"

description: "Stop execution for manual review"

IF answer == "Continue": currentmodule = task.target currentdirectory = task.working_directory ELIF answer == "Skip": Mark task as skipped → proceed to next ELSE: Stop execution → report progress ```

  1. Load module-specific PROJECT_RULES.md:

`` IF {task.working_directory}/PROJECT_RULES.md exists: Instruct agent to read module-specific rules Module rules override root rules ``

  1. Pass working directory to agent:

``` Task( subagenttype=task.agent, prompt="Working directory: {task.workingdirectory}

Before executing, cd to the working directory: cd {task.working_directory}

If PROJECT_RULES.md exists in this directory, read and follow it.

{task.prompt}" ) ```

Optimization: To minimize context switches, batch tasks by module when possible:

  • Original: [backend, frontend, backend, frontend]
  • Optimized: [backend, backend, frontend, frontend]
  • Only reorder if no dependencies between modules

Step 3: Execute Batch

Default: First 3 tasks

Agent Selection: Backend Go → ring:backend-engineer-golang | Backend TS → ring:backend-engineer-typescript | Frontend → ring:frontend-bff-engineer-typescript | Infra → ring:devops-engineer | Testing → ring:qa-analyst | Reliability → ring:sre

For each task: Check context switch (Step 2.5) → Mark inprogress → Dispatch to agent with workingdirectory → Follow plan steps exactly → Run verifications → Mark completed

Step 4: Run Code Review

After each batch, REQUIRED: Use ring:requesting-code-review (all 7 reviewers in parallel)

Handle by severity:

  • Critical/High/Medium: Fix immediately (no TODO) → re-run all 7 reviewers → repeat until resolved
  • Low: Add TODO(review): [Issue] ([reviewer], [date], Low)
  • Cosmetic: Add FIXME(nitpick): [Issue] ([reviewer], [date], Cosmetic)

Proceed when: Zero Critical/High/Medium remain + all Low/Cosmetic have comments

Step 5: Report and Continue

One-go mode: Log internally → proceed to next batch → report only at completion Batch mode: Show implementation + verification + review results → "Ready for feedback." → wait → apply changes → Skill("ring:committing-changes") (after user approves the completed phase, before elaborating the next batch) → proceed

Step 6: Complete Development

Use finishing-a-development-branch to verify tests, present options, execute choice.

When to Stop

STOP immediately: Blocker mid-batch | Critical gaps | Unclear instruction | Verification fails repeatedly. Ask rather than guess.

Remember

  • MANDATORY: AskUserQuestion for execution mode - NO exceptions
  • Use * agents over general-purpose when available
  • Run code review after each batch (all 7 parallel)
  • Fix Critical/High/Medium immediately (no TODO)
  • Low → TODO, Cosmetic → FIXME
  • Stop when blocked, don't guess
  • If rationalizing why to skip AskUserQuestion → You're wrong → Ask anyway

Blocker Criteria

STOP and report if:

| Decision Type | Blocker Condition | Required Action | |---|---|---| | Execution mode | AskUserQuestion not used for mode selection | STOP and ask for execution mode - NO exceptions | | Plan loading | Plan file not found or unreadable | STOP and report missing plan | | Code review | Critical/High/Medium issues found in review | STOP and fix before proceeding | | Task blocker | Task blocked mid-batch | STOP and report blocker details | | Verification | Task verification fails repeatedly | STOP and escalate |

Cannot Be Overridden

The following requirements CANNOT be waived:

  • AskUserQuestion for execution mode is MANDATORY - user intent does NOT skip this step
  • Code review after each batch is REQUIRED - all 7 reviewers in parallel
  • Critical/High/Medium issues MUST be fixed immediately - TODO comments are FORBIDDEN for these severities
  • Context switch confirmation is REQUIRED when switching between modules
  • Full test suite MUST pass before completing development

Severity Calibration

| Severity | Condition | Required Action | |---|---|---| | CRITICAL | Skipped AskUserQuestion for execution mode | MUST stop and ask for mode selection | | CRITICAL | Proceeding with unfixed Critical/High review findings | MUST fix issues before continuing | | HIGH | Skipped code review after batch | MUST run all 7 reviewers | | HIGH | Used TODO for Critical/High/Medium issues | MUST fix immediately, remove TODO | | MEDIUM | Missing context switch confirmation for multi-module | Should add module switch prompt | | LOW | Low-severity issues without TODO comment | Fix by adding proper TODO format |

Pressure Resistance

| User Says | Your Response | |---|---| | "Just execute, don't ask about mode" | "MUST use AskUserQuestion for execution mode. This is a structural checkpoint, not optional. Takes 3 seconds." | | "Skip the code review, we're in a hurry" | "Code review is REQUIRED after each batch. CANNOT proceed without running all 7 reviewers." | | "Add a TODO for that critical issue, fix later" | "Critical/High/Medium issues MUST be fixed immediately. TODO comments FORBIDDEN for these severities." | | "User intent is clear, skip the question" | "Intent is not explicit selection. MUST use AskUserQuestion - it's a structural gate, not conversation." |

Anti-Rationalization Table

| Rationalization | Why It's WRONG | Required Action | |---|---|---| | "User said 'just execute' so mode is clear" | Verbal shorthand ≠ structured mode selection | MUST use AskUserQuestion anyway | | "This is contextual guidance, not absolute law" | It says MANDATORY - that means mandatory | MUST follow the mandatory step | | "Asking would violate their 'don't ask' instruction" | AskUserQuestion is a 3-second structural gate, not a conversation | MUST ask for execution mode | | "Skills are tools, not bureaucratic checklists" | This skill IS the checklist; that's its purpose | MUST follow the checklist | | "Review is overkill for small changes" | Small changes can have critical bugs; review catches them | MUST run code review after each batch |

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.