AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Learn Occam

skill-li-evan-bloom-learn-occam · by Li-Evan

当用户纠结要不要学某个东西、学到什么程度,或在做时间/精力/项目取舍时使用。用「简易策略」先逼问要解决的既定问题,检验现有知识能否搞定,评估知识贬值速度与 ROI,用「探索 vs 应用」判断该学新的还是用现有的,给出「学 / 不学 / 只学最小够用」的结论,避免囤积会贬值的知识。触发场景:要不要学 X、值不值得深入、学到什么程度够、时间不够该学啥、该深挖还是够用就行。

No reviews yet
0 installs
0 views
view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-li-evan-bloom-learn-occam

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-li-evan-bloom-learn-occam)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
1mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Learn Occam? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

简易策略(learn-occam)

> 核心信条:这世界最有价值的不是知识,是你的时间。 能用现有知识解决的就别学新的;以后要用的,以后再学。

何时用

用户在纠结"要不要学 X / 学到什么程度 / 精力往哪放"。这是"广度优先、兴趣队列过长"倾向的刹车

流程

第一步:先找"既定问题"

逼问一句:你要解决的具体问题是什么? 没有具体问题、纯"感觉该学 / 别人都在学"→ 直接进"以后再学"队列,不占当下精力。理解知识的作用,重于知识本身。

第二步:现有知识能不能搞定

问清用户已经会什么——能解决就别学新的。拿不准"是不是其实已经会了"就配合 learn-crossover

第三步:贬值速度 + ROI

这知识多久会贬值?(技术栈 / 工具往往 6–12 个月就明显更新)相对有限的时间值不值?贬值快 + 可外包给 AI / 随时查 → 只需"知道它存在、管什么",不必真学。

第四步:探索 vs 应用(N 臂老虎机)

现在该"探索"(学新)还是"应用"(用现有)?探索成本越高 → 越该偏应用。只有目标够难、现有知识确实够不着时,简易策略才督促你学。

第五步:给结论

明确三选一:① 学(值得且现有搞不定)/ ② 不学(入"以后再学"队列)/ ③ 只学最小够用的那一块(点明是哪一小块)。要深挖就转 learn-graph 建路径。

注意

> ⚠️ 铁律·只用确证的已会知识:判断用户「已经会什么」只能用他确证学过的知识(亲口确认或可靠背景);严禁把「正在讲的材料 / 文章作者背景 / 对话里别人的知识」当成用户会的。拿不准 → 直接问「⚠️ 你学过 ___ 吗?」,绝不替他假设。

  • 简易策略不是"少学",是"让问题决定你学什么"。
  • 它的缺点是易陷局部最优——拿不准"是不是缺前置知识"时转 learn-graph
  • 同族 skill:learn-crossover(已会什么) learn-graph(系统建图) learn-prototype(动手迭代) learn-feynman(自查)。

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.