Install
$ agentstack add skill-lllllllama-rigorpilot-skills-minimal-run-and-audit ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
minimal-run-and-audit
Use this as the Rigor Run skill. The installed slug remains minimal-run-and-audit for compatibility.
Use the shared operating principles in ../ai-research-reproduction/references/agent-operating-principles.md; this skill should make run evidence auditable without turning every command into a rigid protocol.
When to apply
- After a reproduction target and setup plan exist.
- When the main skill needs execution evidence and normalized outputs.
- When a smoke test, documented inference run, documented evaluation run, or other short non-training verification is appropriate.
- When the user already knows what command should be attempted and wants execution plus reporting only.
When not to apply
- During initial repo scanning.
- When environment or assets are still undefined enough to make execution meaningless.
- When the task is a literature lookup rather than repository execution.
- When the user is still deciding which reproduction target should count as the main run.
Clear boundaries
- This skill owns normalized reporting for an attempted command.
- It may receive execution evidence from the main skill or a thin helper.
- It does not choose the overall target on its own.
- It does not perform broad paper analysis.
- It does not own training startup, resume, or long-running training state.
- It should not normalize risky code edits into acceptable practice.
- It must not hide changes that alter evaluation, preprocessing, checkpoints,
metrics, or other scientific meaning.
Input expectations
- selected reproduction goal
- runnable commands or smoke commands
- environment and asset assumptions
- optional patch metadata
Output expectations
- execution result summary
- standardized
repro_outputs/files SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.mdfor changed scientific meaning and evidence statusCOMPARABILITY_REPORT.mdfor README/paper/baseline comparability- clear distinction between verified, partial, and blocked states
PATCHES.mdwhen repo files changed
Notes
Use references/reporting-policy.md, ../ai-research-reproduction/references/research-rigor-principles.md, scripts/run_command.py, and scripts/write_outputs.py.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: lllllllama
- Source: lllllllama/RigorPilot-Skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.