AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Ddd Protocol

skill-lockp111-agent-ddd-engineering-ddd-protocol · by lockp111

Shared DDD workflow protocols referenced by all skills. Contains the Ambiguity Handling Protocol (STOP/ASSUME), Persistence Defense Reference (3-layer model + hooks enforcement), Domain Architecture Reference (red lines), Spec Change Detection Reference, Per-Phase Subagent Dispatch Protocol, Platform Detection Reference (unified platform detection + constraint/hook paths), and Cross-Skill Traceab…

No reviews yet
0 installs
38 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-lockp111-agent-ddd-engineering-ddd-protocol

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-lockp111-agent-ddd-engineering-ddd-protocol)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
5mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Ddd Protocol? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

DDD Protocol References

Overview

Shared protocol definitions used by all DDD skills. Contains 7 reference files that define mandatory constraints for ambiguity handling, persistence defense, domain architecture, spec change detection, subagent dispatch, platform detection, and cross-skill traceability. Not invoked directly as a workflow — other skills load individual reference files on demand via ../ddd-protocol/filename.md.

When to Use

Do NOT invoke this skill directly. Individual reference files are loaded by other skills when entering a phase or checkpoint that requires the protocol. If you need to understand a specific protocol, read the individual reference file — not this SKILL.md.

Quick Reference

| Rule | Requirement | |:-----|:------------| | Ambiguity Protocol | STOP for high return-work radius; ASSUME & RECORD for low radius | | Persistence Defense | Layer 1 (hooks) + Layer 2 (self-check) + Layer 3 (scripts) — all layers mandatory | | Architecture Red Lines | 7 hexagonal + 4 domain modeling constraints — checked in GREEN step | | Spec Change Detection | git diff on Phase 5/6 source files — triggers RECONCILE if changed | | Subagent Dispatch | Context Brief Rule + STOP return + fresh context per phase |

Contents

| File | Purpose | Load Trigger | Used By | |:---|:---|:---|:---| | ambiguity-handling-reference.md | STOP/ASSUME protocol for handling ambiguities by return-work radius | When skill encounters unclear requirement or ambiguous domain term | All 10 workflow skills (extracting-domain-events through mapping-legacy-landscape, excluding language-conventions) + all 5 orchestrators | | persistence-defense-reference.md | 3-layer defense model (hooks + self-check + scripts) + Hooks Enforcement Protocol | When skill produces artifacts that must be written to disk | All 5 orchestrators (full-ddd, iterating-ddd, piloting-ddd, restructuring-ddd, importing-technical-solution) + all skills with Self-Check Protocol | | domain-architecture-reference.md | 7+4 architecture red lines for domain layer purity | When verifying layer boundaries or dependency direction | coding-isolated-domains, test-driven-development, spec-driven-development (via package-placement-reference.md), language-conventions (via go-conventions.md) | | spec-change-detection-reference.md | Git-based change detection convention for spec files | When checking for schema or spec changes between sessions | Convention document — describes the git diff pattern used inline by defining-schemas (Merge mode), spec-driven-development (Merge mode DETECT), and test-driven-development (Entry Check / RECONCILE) | | subagent-dispatch-reference.md | Per-phase subagent dispatch format, STOP return, context brief | When orchestrator dispatches sub-skill as subagent | All 5 orchestrators (full-ddd, iterating-ddd, piloting-ddd, restructuring-ddd, importing-technical-solution) | | platform-detection-reference.md | Unified platform detection, constraint file paths, hook config paths | When detecting agent platform for constraint files (mapping-bounded-contexts Step 6a, spec-driven-development PERSIST) or hook setup (orchestrator Step 0) | mapping-bounded-contexts, spec-driven-development, persistence-defense-reference, all 5 orchestrators | | cross-skill-traceability-reference.md | Artifact dependency chain, template ownership, impact analysis for skill evolution | Before modifying a skill's output structure, template format, or cross-referenced sections | Any skill maintainer; used during skill evolution to identify downstream breakage |

Usage

Reference these files from other skills using relative paths: ../ddd-protocol/filename.md. Files are loaded on demand — do not preload all references at skill start. When adding a new skill that uses a protocol, update the "Used By" column above.

Loading Guidance

Individual reference files are loaded on demand by calling skills — do not preload all 7 files:

  • On ambiguity: Load ambiguity-handling-reference.md when a skill encounters an unclear requirement.
  • On artifact write: Load persistence-defense-reference.md when artifacts must be written to disk.
  • On domain code verification: Load domain-architecture-reference.md when checking layer boundaries.
  • On spec change check: Load spec-change-detection-reference.md when entering merge mode or session recovery.
  • On orchestrator dispatch: Load subagent-dispatch-reference.md when dispatching a sub-skill.
  • On platform detection: Load platform-detection-reference.md when detecting constraint/hook paths.
  • On skill evolution: Load cross-skill-traceability-reference.md before modifying a skill's output structure or templates.

Each file is self-contained. Never load a file "just in case" — load it when you reach the triggering condition above.

Adding a New Protocol

  • File naming: {topic}-reference.md — use kebab-case with the -reference.md suffix.
  • Required structure: Title, Purpose (1 sentence), Rules/Constraints (numbered list), Examples (optional).
  • After creating: Update the Contents table above — add a row with File, Purpose, Load Trigger, and Used By.
  • Scope: One concern per file, keep under 200 lines. If a protocol grows beyond that, split it.

Rationalization Table

If you catch yourself thinking any excuse in the left column — STOP and re-read the Reality column.

| Excuse | Reality | |:---|:---| | "I know the STOP/ASSUME rules from memory" | Protocol references evolve. The file is authoritative, not your cached understanding. Read the file. | | "The protocol is obvious — just STOP when unsure" | The STOP/ASSUME boundary is defined by return-work radius, not by uncertainty level. Low-radius ambiguities should ASSUME, not STOP — unnecessary STOPs block the workflow. | | "Persistence defense is overkill for this small project" | Small projects have the same artifact-loss risk. The 3-layer model costs seconds to set up and prevents hours of rework. | | "I'll check architecture red lines at the end" | Red lines are checked per GREEN step, not at the end. A violation in test #3 contaminates the baseline for tests #4-N. | | "Subagent dispatch overhead is unnecessary — I'll run inline" | Inline execution defeats fresh-context isolation and skips sub-skill loading. The dispatch cost (seconds) is negligible compared to a hallucinated phase output. | | "I'll load all protocol files upfront for efficiency" | Loading all files wastes context window. On-demand loading keeps only relevant constraints active. | | "The spec hasn't changed — skip change detection" | "Hasn't changed" is a claim. git diff is evidence. The check takes seconds. | | "I'll use my own STOP/ASSUME judgment rather than the return-work radius test" | The return-work radius test is the protocol. Your intuition about what's "important enough to STOP" produces inconsistent results. Apply the test. | | "The protocol files haven't changed since I last read them" | Protocol files evolve between sessions. Your cached understanding may be outdated. Re-read the specific file when entering a new phase. | | "I only need the relevant section of the protocol file" | Protocol files are read in full; partial reads produce partial compliance. A section you skip may contain the constraint that applies. | | "The calling skill already restates the protocol rules" | Calling skills reference protocols, not reproduce them; the file is the authority. Restated rules may be simplified or outdated. | | "I'll apply Context A's protocol to Context B — same rules" | Each protocol is context-sensitive; cross-application skips context-specific constraints. Read the protocol for the context you are in. | | "The protocol is just process overhead" | Every constraint exists because its absence caused a concrete failure. Process overhead that prevents rework is not overhead. |

Red Flags

If you catch yourself thinking "I remember the protocol rules", "the protocol is obvious — just STOP when unsure", "persistence defense is optional", "I'll check red lines later", "subagent dispatch overhead is unnecessary — I'll run inline", "skip change detection — nothing changed", "load everything upfront", "I'll use my own STOP/ASSUME judgment rather than the return-work radius test", or "the protocol files haven't changed since I last read them" — STOP. Read the specific protocol reference file. Follow its rules exactly. Protocol files are the source of truth, not memory.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.