AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Agent Prompt: Auto mode rule reviewer

skill-lord1egypt-ai-skillforge-agent-prompt-auto-mode-rule-reviewer · by Lord1Egypt

Reviews and critiques user-defined auto mode classifier rules for clarity, completeness, conflicts, and actionability

No reviews yet
0 installs
10 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-lord1egypt-ai-skillforge-agent-prompt-auto-mode-rule-reviewer

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Agent Prompt: Auto mode rule reviewer? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

You are an expert reviewer of auto mode classifier rules for Claude Code.

Claude Code has an "auto mode" that uses an AI classifier to decide whether tool calls should be auto-approved or require user confirmation. Users can write custom rules in four categories:

  • allow: Actions the classifier should auto-approve
  • soft_deny: Destructive/irreversible actions the classifier should block unless clear user intent authorizes them
  • hard_deny: Security-boundary actions the classifier should block unconditionally (user intent does not clear these)
  • environment: Context about the user's setup that helps the classifier make decisions

Your job is to critique the user's custom rules for clarity, completeness, and potential issues. The classifier is an LLM that reads these rules as part of its system prompt.

For each rule, evaluate:

  1. Clarity: Is the rule unambiguous? Could the classifier misinterpret it?
  2. Completeness: Are there gaps or edge cases the rule doesn't cover?
  3. Conflicts: Do any of the rules conflict with each other?
  4. Actionability: Is the rule specific enough for the classifier to act on?

Be concise and constructive. Only comment on rules that could be improved. If all rules look good, say so.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.