AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Review Changes

skill-lucface-claude-skills-review-changes · by Lucface

Analyze uncommitted changes before committing. Quick pre-commit review of what you're about to ship.

— No reviews yet
0 installs
35 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-lucface-claude-skills-review-changes

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
  • ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
  • ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • ✓ Untrusted network calls
  • ✓ Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • ✓ Network access No
  • ✓ Filesystem access No
  • ✓ Shell / process execution No
  • ● Environment & secrets Used
  • ✓ Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-lucface-claude-skills-review-changes)

Reliability & compatibility

✓ Security review passed
0 installs to date
— no reviews yet
● 3mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Review Changes? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Review Changes (/review-changes)

Analyze all uncommitted changes in the working directory before committing.

When to Use

  • Before git commit — quick sanity check
  • Before /ship — preview what's going out
  • When you've been coding for a while and lost track of changes
  • Before creating a PR

Instructions

When the user invokes /review-changes:

Step 1: Gather Changes

# Staged changes
git diff --cached --stat
git diff --cached

# Unstaged changes
git diff --stat
git diff

# Untracked files
git status --short | grep "^??"

If no changes found: "Working directory is clean. Nothing to review."

Step 2: Summarize

Produce a structured summary:

## Changes Overview

**Staged (ready to commit):**
- `src/auth.ts` — +42 -12 (added token refresh logic)
- `test/auth.test.ts` — +28 -0 (new tests for refresh)

**Unstaged:**
- `src/utils.ts` — +3 -1 (minor fix, probably should stage)

**Untracked:**
- `src/new-feature.ts` — New file (should this be committed?)

**Total: N files changed, +X -Y lines**

Step 3: Quick Analysis

For each changed file, check:

  1. Accidental changes — Debug logs, console.log, commented code left in
  2. Missing files — New imports that reference untracked files
  3. Secrets check — Any .env values, API keys, tokens in the diff
  4. Convention compliance — Quick check against CLAUDE.md rules
  5. Test coverage — Did source files change without corresponding test changes?
  6. Proof of thoughtfulness — Were decisions intentional or just model defaults? Flag any architectural choice that looks like it was accepted without review (e.g., new abstractions, dependency additions, structural patterns that don't match existing conventions).
  7. Cut check — Flag any addition without a linked issue, user request, or explicit decision. If it can't be explained in one sentence to a beta user, it doesn't ship in V1.

Step 4: Report Issues

## Issues Found

### Must Fix
- `src/auth.ts:15` — `console.log("debug")` left in
- `src/config.ts:8` — Hardcoded API key (NEVER commit this)

### Should Fix
- `src/utils.ts` — Changed but no test updates
- `src/new-feature.ts` — Not staged, but imported by staged files

### Looks Good
- Token refresh logic is clean
- Tests cover the happy path and error cases

Step 5: Suggest Commit

If everything looks good (or after fixes):

## Suggested Commit

**Message:** `add token refresh with automatic retry`

**Stage these:**
```bash
git add src/auth.ts test/auth.test.ts src/utils.ts

Don't stage:

  • src/scratch.ts — Looks like scratch work

Proceed with commit? Or fix issues first?


## Arguments

| Arg | Effect |
|-----|--------|
| `--staged-only` | Only review staged changes |
| `--quick` | Skip analysis, just show summary |
| `--fix` | Auto-fix issues found (remove debug logs, etc.) |

## Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

- **Author:** [Lucface](https://github.com/Lucface)
- **Source:** [Lucface/claude-skills](https://github.com/Lucface/claude-skills)
- **License:** MIT

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.