Install
$ agentstack add skill-lum1104-red-button-red-button ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Red Button
Some changes deserve a slower agent. Apply a focused gate only where consequence requires it.
Classify the operation
- Name the exact action, target environment, affected users or assets, and externally visible effect.
- Classify the operation as
ordinaryorhigh-risk. Mark it high-risk if failure could destroy or expose important state, cross a security or authorization boundary, move money, contact many people, break external consumers, disrupt production, or resist timely recovery. - Treat uncertainty about the target, blast radius, rollback, or authority as risk to resolve before execution.
- For an ordinary operation, proceed with the normal workflow. Do not load a reference or manufacture a risk review.
- For a high-risk operation, name the risk category and load only its reference. Load multiple references only when the operation genuinely crosses categories.
Load the focused reference
| Risk category | Reference | | --- | --- | | Production schema or data migration; deletion or bulk repair | [data-operations.md](references/data-operations.md) | | Force push, rebase of published work, or history rewrite | [repository-history.md](references/repository-history.md) | | Authentication, authorization, IAM, secrets, or credentials | [identity-and-secrets.md](references/identity-and-secrets.md) | | Charges, refunds, subscriptions, invoices, pricing, or payment flows | [billing-and-payments.md](references/billing-and-payments.md) | | Infrastructure, networking, capacity, or production configuration | [infrastructure.md](references/infrastructure.md) | | Public API contracts, events, schemas, or compatibility | [public-apis.md](references/public-apis.md) | | Email, notification, campaign, or other bulk outreach | [mass-communication.md](references/mass-communication.md) | | Production model, prompt, retrieval, guardrail, or tool-policy deployment | [model-and-prompt-deployments.md](references/model-and-prompt-deployments.md) |
Apply the gate
Before acting:
- Satisfy the loaded reference's preconditions with concrete evidence. Keep unknowns explicit.
- Separate analysis, rehearsal, and approval from the consequential execution step.
- Prefer the smallest reversible action, staged rollout, and bounded exposure that can achieve the goal.
- Define observable success, stop conditions, and a recovery owner before creating side effects.
- Request approval at the boundary named by the reference unless the user has already authorized that exact action, target, and scope. Never treat technical access as authorization.
During execution, verify the resolved target again, preserve the safety bounds, observe the chosen signals, and stop when a stop condition fires. Do not improvise past a failed guardrail.
After execution, verify the real effect and recovery posture. Report what changed, the scope reached, the evidence observed, any remaining risk, and whether rollback remains available.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: Lum1104
- Source: Lum1104/red-button
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.