Install
$ agentstack add skill-macroman5-autotrain-yolo-analyze-results ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Analyze Results
Single-pass analysis run after each experiment or on-demand via /analyze.
Data
Read:
- Latest experiment's report +
results.csvortune_results.csv - Current best metrics from
experiments/summary.mdjournal entries experiments/dataset_profile.yamltraining-plan.md(thresholds, goals, constraints)
Results.csv Lookup Order
experiments/exp_NNN_name/train/results.csvexperiments/exp_NNN_name/results.csv- Fall back to
metrics.yaml— note that training dynamics analysis is unavailable
For tune runs, also check:
experiments/exp_NNN_name/tune/tune_results.csv
Analysis
Comparison: Latest vs baseline AND current best (mAP50-95, per-class AP)
Per-class regression check: Flag any class exceeding training-plan.md threshold vs current best
Training dynamics (if results.csv available):
- Convergence speed: epochs to reach 90% of final mAP
- Overfitting onset: epoch where val loss diverges from train loss
- Loss plateau: epochs with <0.1% change in val loss
- LR effectiveness: correlation between LR schedule phase and metric improvement
Tune analysis (if tune_results.csv available):
- Tune convergence: are later iterations improving or stalled?
- Best params found vs defaults — which params moved the most?
- Top-N trial spread: how tight is the performance range?
Diminishing returns detection (when 3+ experiments show <0.5% change):
- Same-category stall (all augmentation, or all LR variations): that lever is exhausted, try a different category
- Cross-category stall (multiple lever types tried): model may be at ceiling for this dataset/architecture
- Recommendation differs per stall type — surface this explicitly
Recommendations: Ordered by expected impact. Each cites evidence from the analysis.
Output
Write experiments/analysis.md with findings and recommendations. Print top 3 findings + top 3 recommendations.
Findings also inform the journal entry's learning field and the next DIAGNOSE step in the reasoning loop.
Important
- The reasoning loop's DIAGNOSE step reads
analysis.mdfrom the previous experiment or last explicit/analyze. It does NOT read analysis of the experiment that just ran before it has been analyzed. - Keep analysis concise — focus on what changed and what to try next, not restating all historical metrics.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: MacroMan5
- Source: MacroMan5/autotrain-yolo
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.