Install
$ agentstack add skill-manhvann-codexkit-fix ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Fixing
Unified skill for fixing issues of any complexity with intelligent routing.
Arguments
--auto- Activate autonomous mode (default)--review- Activate human-in-the-loop review mode--quick- Activate quick mode--parallel- Activate parallel mode: route to parallelfullstack_developeragents per issue
Workflow
Step 1: Mode Selection
First action: If there is no "auto" keyword in the request, ask the user to determine workflow mode:
| Option | Recommend When | Behavior | |--------|----------------|----------| | Autonomous (default) | Simple/moderate issues | Auto-approve if score >= 9.5 & 0 critical | | Human-in-the-loop Review | Critical/production code | Pause for approval at each step | | Quick | Type errors, lint, trivial bugs | Fast debug → fix → review cycle |
See references/mode-selection.md for the mode-selection prompt format.
Step 2: Debug
- Activate
ck:debugskill. - Guess all possible root causes.
- Prefer multiple
Explore/scout agents in parallel to verify each hypothesis when the runtime exposes delegation; otherwise use parallel searches and report the limitation. - Create report with all findings for the next step.
Step 3: Complexity Assessment & Task Orchestration
Classify before routing. See references/complexity-assessment.md.
| Level | Indicators | Workflow | |-------|------------|----------| | Simple | Single file, clear error, type/lint | references/workflow-quick.md | | Moderate | Multi-file, root cause unclear | references/workflow-standard.md | | Complex | System-wide, architecture impact | references/workflow-deep.md | | Parallel | 2+ independent issues OR --parallel flag | Parallel fullstack_developer agents |
Task Orchestration (Moderate+ only): After classifying, use available task-tracking tools for all phases upfront with dependencies. See references/task-orchestration.md.
- Skip for Quick workflow (< 3 steps, overhead exceeds benefit)
- Create tracked tasks with dependency chains when task tools exist
- Update task/checklist state as each phase completes
- For Parallel: create separate task trees per independent issue
Step 4: Fix Implementation & Verification
- Implement fix per selected workflow, updating Tasks as phases complete.
- Prefer multiple scout agents to verify no regressions when available.
- Prevent future issues by adding comprehensive validation.
Step 5: Finalize (MANDATORY - never skip)
- Report summary: confidence score, changes, files
- Prefer
docs_managersubagent → update the configured docs path if changes warrant - Update task state/checklists and mark all tracked tasks completed
- Ask user if they want to commit via
git_managersubagent
IMPORTANT: Skill/Subagent Activation Matrix
See references/skill-activation-matrix.md for complete matrix.
Always activate: ck:debug (all workflows) Conditional: ck:problem-solving, ck:sequential-thinking, ck:brainstorm, ck:context-engineering Subagents: debugger, researcher, planner, code_reviewer, tester, Bash Parallel: Multiple Explore agents for scouting, Bash agents for verification
Output Format
Unified step markers:
✓ Step 0: [Mode] selected - [Complexity] detected
✓ Step 1: Root cause identified - [summary]
✓ Step 2: Fix implemented - [N] files changed
✓ Step 3: Tests [X/X passed]
✓ Step 4: Review [score]/10 - [status]
✓ Step 5: Complete - [action taken]
References
Load as needed:
references/mode-selection.md- Prompt format for modereferences/complexity-assessment.md- Classification criteriareferences/task-orchestration.md- Native Codex Task patterns for moderate+ workflowsreferences/workflow-quick.md- Quick: debug → fix → reviewreferences/workflow-standard.md- Standard: full pipeline with Tasksreferences/workflow-deep.md- Deep: research + brainstorm + plan with Tasksreferences/review-cycle.md- Review logic (autonomous vs HITL)references/skill-activation-matrix.md- When to activate each skillreferences/parallel-exploration.md- Parallel Explore/Bash/Task coordination patterns
Specialized Workflows:
references/workflow-ci.md- GitHub Actions/CI failuresreferences/workflow-logs.md- Application log analysisreferences/workflow-test.md- Test suite failuresreferences/workflow-types.md- TypeScript type errorsreferences/workflow-ui.md- Visual/UI issues (requires design skills)
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: manhvann
- Source: manhvann/codexkit
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.