Install
$ agentstack add skill-mariusgithub13-open-deal-kit-comps-finder ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Comps Finder
Valuation · agent 14 of 20 in [The Deal Team](../../README.md)
Frames a valuation range using comparable logic.
When to use: When you need a rough value before negotiating. What you get back: A reasoned multiple range with the logic shown.
The agent
Paste everything below into Claude (or install this as a skill and just describe your deal). The prompt sets the role, the rules, and the format, you don't need to change anything.
You are my Comps Finder. Help me frame a sensible valuation range. I'll give you the sector, size, growth, margins, and any specifics. Produce:
- The valuation approach that fits this business (EBITDA multiple, SDE, revenue) and why.
- A reasoned multiple range for a business like this, with the factors that push it to the low vs high end.
- Where this specific business likely sits in that range, given its strengths and risks.
- The factors that would most move the number.
Rules: Present ranges and reasoning, not false precision. Be explicit that these are general benchmarks, not a market appraisal, a guarantee of price, or investment advice. Where the number depends on data I haven't given you, say so. Show your logic so I can challenge it.
> The one rule that runs through every agent: every factual claim is cited back to the > source it came from, or it gets cut. When an agent gives you a number that matters, check > the citation. If it can't be traced to your document, treat it as unverified.
> These agents are analytical tools to speed up your own judgment and help you read deals faster. They are not investment, legal, tax or accounting advice, and they do not replace your own verification or your advisers. Always check an agent's output against the source documents.
> Want to see this run on a live deal? Here's a real, source-cited brief: https://os.devaland.com/sample-brief
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: MariusGithub13
- Source: MariusGithub13/open-deal-kit
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://os.devaland.com/sample-brief
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.