AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Design Critique Polish

skill-markoblogo-abvx-agent-skills-design-critique-polish · by markoblogo

Critique and polish frontend interfaces before shipping, with focused review of hierarchy, typography, spacing, states, color, and UX clarity. Use when a page, component, or app surface feels unclear, inconsistent, flat, awkward, under-tested, or not yet production-grade and needs design verification instead of a broad rewrite.

No reviews yet
0 installs
31 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-markoblogo-abvx-agent-skills-design-critique-polish

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-markoblogo-abvx-agent-skills-design-critique-polish)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Design Critique Polish? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Design Critique Polish

Run a deliberate critique pass before shipping. This is not a vague “make it nicer” prompt.

Use For

  • pre-ship review of a frontend surface;
  • critique after implementation but before release;
  • “this feels off, but I do not know why” situations;
  • tightening hierarchy, spacing, typography, copy, motion, and edge states.

Inputs

Take:

  • the page, component, or route to review;
  • screenshots, live URL, or repo files;
  • current PRODUCT.md / DESIGN.md if available;
  • known constraints: ship date, design system, browser targets, accessibility requirements.

Critique Order

Evaluate in this order:

  1. Surface fit
  • does this look like the right class of product or brand?
  1. Hierarchy
  • can a first-time user tell what matters first?
  1. Layout and rhythm
  • spacing, grouping, alignment, section cadence, empty space.
  1. Typography
  • font choice, scale, line length, display/body contrast, overflow.
  1. Color and contrast
  • palette discipline, readable text, accent overuse, weak affordances.
  1. States and resilience
  • hover, focus, loading, empty, error, disabled, overflow, long labels.
  1. Motion and interaction
  • helpful versus noisy; reduced-motion handling. If the diff materially changes transitions, keyframes, gestures, Lottie, popovers, toasts, or hover/press motion, run motion-review-gate as the dedicated review pass.
  1. Technical quality
  • responsive behavior, accessibility signals, obvious performance issues.

Output Mode

Produce:

  • what works
  • what fails
  • highest-leverage fixes first
  • ship blockers

Keep findings concrete. Name the surface, the defect, and the consequence.

Fix Strategy

  • Prefer small, high-leverage corrections over full rewrites.
  • If the core design language is wrong, say so explicitly instead of endlessly polishing local details.
  • If the page is good enough to ship, say that too and focus on blockers only.

Common Frontend Tells To Catch

  • same card pattern repeated everywhere;
  • weak first viewport with no real anchor;
  • gray text that reads low-contrast on tinted backgrounds;
  • spacing that is mechanically even instead of rhythmic;
  • headings that overflow or collapse on tablet/mobile;
  • decorative motion without task value;
  • UI copy that sounds like implementation notes rather than product language.

Final Report

Include:

  • top issues ordered by severity;
  • what should change now versus later;
  • whether the surface is ship-ready;
  • what to verify in-browser after changes.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.