AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Article Strategy

skill-marvinrichter-clarc-article-strategy · by marvinrichter

Turn a raw idea into a structured article brief — defines audience, angle, core argument, competitive gap, and voice. Use before writing an outline or draft. The output of this skill is a brief that feeds directly into article-writing.

No reviews yet
0 installs
13 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-marvinrichter-clarc-article-strategy

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Article Strategy? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Article Strategy

Turn a raw topic, note dump, or vague idea into a sharp brief before writing begins. Good briefs prevent rewrites.

When to Activate

  • user has a topic but hasn't defined the audience or angle yet
  • user wants to write a blog post, essay, or guide but isn't sure what the core argument is
  • user wants to avoid writing something that already exists (competitive gap check)
  • turning internal notes, a talk, or a conversation into a publishable article

First Questions (always ask — do not skip)

Collect these before producing the brief. If the user has already answered some in their message, do not re-ask:

  1. Audience — Who reads this? (role, experience level, what they care about)
  2. Platform — Where will it be published? (personal blog, company blog, dev.to, Substack, LinkedIn, HN)
  3. Voice — Should it match a specific voice? If yes, ask for 1–3 examples (published articles, posts, memos)
  4. Goal — What should the reader do or think differently after reading?
  5. Source material — Are there notes, transcripts, research, or prior drafts to draw from?

If the user says they have no voice preference, default to: direct, operator-style — concrete, practical, no hype.

Brief Structure

Produce the brief in this exact format:

## Article Brief

**Working title:** [Specific, not generic. Should signal the angle, not just the topic]
**Audience:** [Role + experience level + what they already know]
**Platform:** [Where it will be published — affects tone, length, formatting norms]
**Goal:** [One sentence: what the reader thinks or does differently after reading]
**Core argument:** [One declarative sentence. Not a question. Not "this article explores..."]
**Competitive gap:** [What existing articles on this topic get wrong, skip, or miss — why this one is worth reading]
**Voice:** [2–3 adjectives + one example sentence in that voice]
**Suggested length:** [Word count range based on platform and depth]
**Source material:** [File paths or "none"]

Angle Selection

If the user hasn't landed on a specific angle, offer 3 options with a recommendation:

| Option | Angle | Core argument | Best for | |---|---|---|---| | A | [e.g., Tutorial] | [One sentence] | [Audience segment] | | B | [e.g., Opinion] | [One sentence] | [Audience segment] | | C | [e.g., Case study] | [One sentence] | [Audience segment] |

Recommend one and explain why in one sentence.

Competitive Gap Analysis

Before finalizing the brief, identify what makes this article worth reading:

  • What's the most common framing of this topic? (so we can differentiate)
  • What do existing articles assume that isn't true for this audience?
  • What's the insight or evidence that others don't have?

If the user doesn't know, ask: "What do you know about this topic that most articles don't cover?"

Working Title Formula

Strong working titles follow one of these patterns:

  • The Reversal: "Why [common belief] is wrong — and what to do instead"
  • The Concrete Promise: "How we [specific outcome] in [timeframe]"
  • The Counterintuitive Fact: "[Surprising number or observation] about [topic]"
  • The Named Problem: "The [specific failure mode] trap — and how to avoid it"

Avoid: "A guide to...", "Everything you need to know about...", "Introduction to..."

Voice Capture (if examples provided)

Extract from the provided examples:

  • sentence length and rhythm (short/punchy vs. long/layered)
  • formal / conversational / sharp
  • favored devices: parentheses, fragments, lists, rhetorical questions, em-dashes
  • tolerance for humor, strong opinion, contrarian framing
  • formatting habits: headers, bullets, code blocks, pull quotes

Produce one example sentence in the captured voice to confirm with the user.

Output

After collecting answers to the First Questions, produce:

  1. The completed brief
  2. (If angle not fixed) Three angle options with a recommendation
  3. A confirmation question: "Does this brief match what you had in mind, or should we adjust the angle/audience?"

Do not proceed to outlining until the user confirms the brief.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.