Install
$ agentstack add skill-masriyan-claude-code-cybersecurity-skill-13-crypto-analysis ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ● Network access Used
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
About
Cryptographic Analysis & Assessment
Purpose
Enable Claude to assist with cryptographic security assessments including SSL/TLS configuration auditing, cipher suite analysis and recommendation, hash algorithm identification, encryption implementation code review, key management evaluation, and detection of cryptographic vulnerabilities. Claude directly analyzes provided configurations and code.
Activation Triggers
This skill activates when the user asks about:
- Auditing SSL/TLS configuration of a server or service
- Evaluating cipher suites for security strength
- Identifying hash algorithms from hash values or code
- Reviewing code for cryptographic implementation flaws
- Assessing key lengths, key management, or rotation policies
- Detecting hardcoded keys, weak IVs, or ECB mode usage
- Generating TLS configuration recommendations (Mozilla profile)
- Certificate analysis (expiration, chain, transparency)
- Post-quantum cryptography guidance
- Password hashing implementation review (bcrypt, Argon2, PBKDF2)
Prerequisites
pip install cryptography requests pyOpenSSL
Recommended tools:
sslyze— Python TLS scannertestssl.sh— Comprehensive TLS testingopenssl— Command-line TLS operationsWireshark— TLS traffic analysiscertbot— Certificate management
Core Capabilities
1. SSL/TLS Configuration Auditing
When the user asks to audit TLS for a server or paste a TLS configuration:
Command-line audit approach:
# Quick TLS check using openssl
openssl s_client -connect example.com:443 -tls1_2 2>/dev/null | grep -E "Protocol|Cipher"
openssl s_client -connect example.com:443 -tls1 2>/dev/null | grep -E "handshake|error"
# Check certificate details
openssl s_client -connect example.com:443 /dev/null | openssl x509 -noout -dates -subject -issuer
# Comprehensive scan with sslyze
sslyze --regular example.com --json_out result.json
# Or testssl.sh (most comprehensive)
./testssl.sh --severity HIGH --quiet example.com
# Use the skill's script
python scripts/tls_auditor.py --host example.com --port 443 --output report.json
python scripts/tls_auditor.py --host mail.example.com --port 993 --grade
TLS Version Support Ratings: | Protocol | Status | Action | |----------|--------|--------| | SSLv2 | Critically broken | Block immediately | | SSLv3 | Broken (POODLE) | Block immediately | | TLS 1.0 | Deprecated (PCI-DSS violation) | Disable — BEAST, POODLE | | TLS 1.1 | Deprecated | Disable | | TLS 1.2 | Acceptable (with strong ciphers) | Keep with restrictions | | TLS 1.3 | Current standard | Enable and prefer |
TLS Vulnerability Checklist:
[ ] Heartbleed (CVE-2014-0160): openssl s_client + heartbleed test
[ ] POODLE: SSLv3 enabled?
[ ] BEAST: TLS 1.0 + CBC cipher?
[ ] ROBOT: RSA key exchange supported?
[ ] DROWN: SSLv2 on any port of same server?
[ ] Logjam/FREAK: DHE tuple[bytes, bytes]:
if salt is None:
salt = secrets.token_bytes(32) # 256-bit random salt
kdf = PBKDF2HMAC(
algorithm=hashes.SHA256(),
length=32, # 256-bit key
salt=salt,
iterations=600_000 # NIST 2023 minimum for PBKDF2-SHA256
)
key = kdf.derive(password)
return key, salt
# SECURE: AES-GCM (authenticated encryption)
def encrypt(data: bytes, key: bytes) -> bytes:
aesgcm = AESGCM(key)
nonce = secrets.token_bytes(12) # 96-bit random nonce (NEVER reuse!)
ciphertext = aesgcm.encrypt(nonce, data, associated_data=None)
return nonce + ciphertext # Prepend nonce for decryption
def decrypt(ciphertext: bytes, key: bytes) -> bytes:
aesgcm = AESGCM(key)
nonce = ciphertext[:12]
return aesgcm.decrypt(nonce, ciphertext[12:], associated_data=None)
# SECURE: Argon2id for password hashing
from argon2 import PasswordHasher
ph = PasswordHasher(time_cost=3, memory_cost=65536, parallelism=4)
hashed = ph.hash(password) # Automatic random salt
ph.verify(hashed, password) # Verify with timing-safe comparison
Code Review Checklist:
Encryption:
[ ] No hardcoded keys (check for key = b"...", SECRET_KEY = "...", etc.)
[ ] No ECB mode (MODE_ECB, "AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding")
[ ] IV/Nonce is random and unique per encryption operation
[ ] Authenticated encryption used (AES-GCM, ChaCha20-Poly1305)
[ ] Key properly derived from password (PBKDF2, bcrypt, Argon2)
[ ] No custom/homebrew crypto algorithms
Certificate Handling:
[ ] Certificate validation is NOT disabled (verify=True)
[ ] Certificate pinning for mobile/critical apps
[ ] No ssl._create_unverified_context
Randomness:
[ ] Cryptographic operations use secrets module or os.urandom()
[ ] Not using random.random() or random.randint() for security
[ ] Tokens and OTPs have sufficient entropy (≥128 bits)
5. Key Management Assessment
When the user asks about key management:
Key Length Recommendations (2025): | Algorithm | Minimum | Recommended | Notes | |-----------|---------|-------------|-------| | RSA | 2048-bit | 3072-bit | NIST recommends 3072+ post-2030 | | ECC (ECDSA) | P-256 | P-384 | P-256 OK through 2030 | | AES | 128-bit | 256-bit | 128-bit adequate; use 256 for high-value | | ECDH (key exchange) | P-256 | P-384 | | | DH (classic) | 2048-bit | 3072-bit | Avoid, prefer ECDH | | SHA (hashing) | SHA-256 | SHA-256/384/512 | SHA-1 deprecated |
Post-Quantum Cryptography Transition:
NIST finalized PQC standards in 2024:
- ML-KEM (CRYSTALS-Kyber) — Key encapsulation mechanism (replaces RSA/ECDH for key exchange)
- ML-DSA (CRYSTALS-Dilithium) — Digital signature (replaces RSA/ECDSA)
- SLH-DSA (SPHINCS+) — Stateless hash-based signature (conservative fallback)
For systems expected to protect data beyond 2030, begin PQC migration planning.
Key Rotation Schedule: | Key Type | Recommended Rotation | |----------|---------------------| | TLS certificates | Annual (or use 90-day Let's Encrypt) | | Signing keys (JWT/API) | 90 days | | Encryption keys (data at rest) | Annual | | API keys / service tokens | 90 days or per-service | | Employee SSH keys | Annual + on role change | | Password hashes | On password change |
Script Reference
tls_auditor.py
python scripts/tls_auditor.py --host example.com --port 443 --output report.json
python scripts/tls_auditor.py --host mail.example.com --port 993 --grade
Skill Integration
| Condition | Adjacent Skill | |-----------|---------------| | TLS audit for web application | ← Skill 09 (Web Security) | | Cloud service encryption assessment | ← Skill 10 (Cloud Security) | | Weak crypto findings → hardening recommendations | → Skill 15 (Blue Team Defense) | | Crypto flaws → vulnerability report | → Skill 02 (Vulnerability Scanner) |
References
- Mozilla SSL Configuration Generator
- NIST SP 800-52 Rev. 2 — TLS Guidelines
- SSL Labs Grading Criteria
- NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards
- OWASP Cryptographic Failures
- OWASP Cryptographic Storage Cheat Sheet
- NIST Password Storage Guidelines
v3.0 Enhancements (2026 Update)
Post-quantum migration is now operational:
- Finalized PQC standards — FIPS 203 (ML-KEM, key encapsulation), FIPS 204 (ML-DSA, signatures), and FIPS 205 (SLH-DSA, hash-based signatures) are published. Recommend these for new designs; FIPS 206 (FN-DSA/Falcon) is forthcoming.
- Hybrid key exchange — for TLS, recommend hybrid groups (e.g., X25519+ML-KEM-768 /
X25519MLKEM768) so confidentiality survives both classical and quantum attacks during transition. - Harvest-now-decrypt-later — prioritize PQC for long-lived secrets and data with multi-year confidentiality requirements; this is a present risk, not a future one.
- Crypto-agility — flag hardcoded algorithms/key sizes; recommend abstraction so primitives can be swapped. Inventory cryptography (a CBOM) as the first migration step.
- Hard deprecations — TLS 1.3 preferred / TLS 1.0-1.1 disallowed; SHA-1 and RSA/DH < 2048 flagged as failing; RSA-2048 acceptable now but on the PQC migration clock.
Precision rule: every finding states the primitive, key size/curve, protocol version, and the concrete upgrade (classical-now and PQC-target).
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: Masriyan
- Source: Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://www.security-life.org
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.